View attachment 47516
Glad to see our Harry is living that nice quiet private life he apparently craved so much
To be fair, his family were probably briefing the press about him, and his brother probably did knock him on his arse.What happens when you get pussy whipped by a talentless gold digger sadly. He'll just continue throwing his family under the bus to keep his money hungry wife happy.
To be fair, his family were probably briefing the press about him, and his brother probably did knock him on his arse.
Remind me why they don't really pay proper tax and are above many of our laws again?
So what if William knocked him on his arse? they aren't the first siblings to come to blows over a woman and they won't be the last. For someone that wants "a quiet life" he sure knows how to keep on going and going and going, it's all about the money at this point, whatever morales and integrity harry had are gone now. There's just the money hoover known as Meghan and her little lapdog Harry now.
Part of me hopes Charles comes out and confirms that James Hewitt is his dad and severs all ties with him, that'll never happen obviously. The Palace should do something though, I'd say stripping their titles would be a good start.
We don't actually know what happened but if he has been treated badly, which would surprise nobody, then why shouldn't he cash in on it?
It's all just the latest celeb bollocks and will go away when the right wing loons, Gbeebies et al, find something else to distract their idiot viewers with.
Because the royal family is meant to be above all this shite, just sack the lot of them off.
Yeah, but afaik, Harry asked to walk away from it all...and was denied. If I was in his place, then I would say bollocks to it all too.
Anyway, all this is insignificant when put against paying £12m of our money to protect a rapist.
Yeah, but afaik, Harry asked to walk away from it all...and was denied. If I was in his place, then I would say bollocks to it all too.
Anyway, all this is insignificant when put against paying £12m of our money to protect a rapist.
Balls. They're dirty fucks. Always have been.Because the royal family is meant to be above all this shite, just sack the lot of them off.
Balls. They're dirty fucks. Always have been.
Protect a what? What rapist?
Im not sure thats the case. He did walk away, asked for privacy, then released a netflix series and a book?
Prince Andrew won’t claim he didn’t rape Virginia Giuffre after settlement: report
Virginia Roberts Giuffre expected to give statement at Ghislaine Maxwell sentencingwww.independent.co.uk
Did they though? I've not paid much attention but there only ever seems to be any noise about them when they thrust themselves into the spotlight. The media always seems to be reacting to them rather than the other way around.He walked away and they fucking trashed him and his missus. Not through their mouths, but their mouthpieces - the press. Constant briefings, day after day, pick pick pick. It isn't about privacy, it's about controlling the narrative. I'd do the same - if people are going to trash me every day of my life, I'm going to start talking.
Anyway, who gives a shit. They're all just rich people who happened to slide out of the correct vagina back in the day.
That's an absolute crock of shit. They've never been "above" anything.Of course they're dirty fucks! but dirty fucks that shouldn't be airing their dirty laundry, as Aoami said, they're meant to be above all this.
I'd usually side with that 100% - but if it was Assange who was wanted on rape in the US we'd have deported him the same day.That doesn't mean what you think it does. I'm no apologist for Prince Andrew but being gagged by your own family for PR reasons isn't a guilty verdict, and shouldn't be treated as one. Conviction or GTFO.
Awww. I knew I'd get a facepalm from royal-loving tory-boy @Embattle for that, but I thought it'd be after I'd finished editing the post!
Being above the law - any law - isn't on under any circumstances.calling someone a rapist without a conviction isn't on under any circumstances.
Being above the law - any law - isn't on under any circumstances.
If someone is above the law in whatever capacity then calling them whatever you like is fair game IMO.
You're misunderstanding me.. There is no evidence to make a prosecution. Not "insufficient". None.
You're misunderstanding me.
I accept what you say above. Totally OK with it.
What I mean is - even if the authorities had video evidence of him pounding babies with the queen clapping him on the royal family submitting him for prosecution would be a voluntary decision.
I mean, they'd do it - not to do it would brimg them down - but it would be voluntary.
But constant low-level criminality is overlooked completely.
Hence, for me, call them what you like, when you like, evidence or not.
Yep. And that's what I care about because they're here and:If it was the British courts going after him that would be true
They can try him in absentia all they like. He ain't ever going to go to prison for any crime in America.but not the Americans, there are plenty of American DAs with a bit of Anglophobia in the family tree who'd be happy to make a name for themselves, if they thought they could make a case. Even in absentia trials aren't unheard of.