- Joined
- Dec 27, 2003
- Messages
- 44,654
Ive posted Time magazines website.
I mean youve got bigger problems with your own reasoning if that bolloks to you.
No, I mean you're a delusional, paranoid idiot.
Bill Gates, new world order. lol
Ive posted Time magazines website.
I mean youve got bigger problems with your own reasoning if that bolloks to you.
Yes. It needs amending as it's broken. It's a proposal to change some ways of working. That's a normal way of doing things.Its a way to re imagine capitalism and the world order...thats its actually mission.
Or wank.Video games 'good for well-being', says University of Oxford study
Gamers who played titles for longer reported feeling happier than those who did not.www.bbc.co.uk
imagine how grumpy we would be if we didnt game lol
I spent more time on my bike (Zwift, it's cold, dark and wet) then I do playing video games.
I posted its a way to re imagine capitalism and you replied .It's not an agenda ffs. It's no grand scheme to undermine society.
They are trying to find ways to better society. It's just ideas on how we could improve society.
You're making it something it isn't
I posted its a way to re imagine capitalism and you replied .
'Its not an agenda to undermine society, 'and someone liked your comment.
Do you just make shit up when you see my name, based on what you inagine people who arent like you think.
Do you have a proper trainer? Do you take the rear wheel off your bike and stick that in it? I don't know whether I'd bother unless I could gamify my riding - but even then, all I really need to do is put my lights on my helmet and get out - I've got it all on my doorstep.
Still. Interesting.
Wool? Merino base layers?
I think we can take it as read that the endgame for this reset will require a new world order.You also said new world order.
Do you seriously believe that Bill Gates is behind some population balancing cullings?
I mean.
really?
Define New World Order please. Is it the sort of New World Order change that Regan and Thatcher brought in? If so, you just need to take more care with your words, because New World Order means something.I think we can take it as read that the endgame for this reset will require a new world order.
Thats not conspiracy, its something that has happened and will probably happen many more times.
Its hardly a cry for a status quo
Yes. It needs amending as it's broken. It's a proposal to change some ways of working. That's a normal way of doing things.
Thatcher and Regan made *massive* changes to the rules in the 1980's. This is just another proposal to change to fix another set of problems we now see.
Stakeholder capitalism. Seems sensible.
What's your specific objection?
I think we can take it as read that the endgame for this reset will require a new world order.
Thats not conspiracy, its something that has happened and will probably happen many more times.
Its hardly a cry for a status quo
It was great. We both watched all of it.Thanks @Scouse ... I really enjoyed that - I live very close to that canal and often walk parts of it, so seeing it as it used to be is mesmerising to me !
Im not sure if youre asking me to back up my claim that the world order has changed in history, so I'll presume you mean the outcome of the great reset plan.
Just ditching fossil fuels alone would result in a new world order.
Im not sure if youre asking me to back up my claim that the world order has changed in history, so I'll presume you mean the outcome of the great reset plan.
Just ditching fossil fuels alone would result in a new world order.
Im not sure if youre asking me to back up my claim that the world order has changed in history, so I'll presume you mean the outcome of the great reset plan.
Just ditching fossil fuels alone would result in a new world order.
So why were you getting your knickers in a twist if the things they are having ideas about are good for the planet and for the general population?
Because ditching fossil fuels is a good idea really unless you like polluting the world?
When it comes to imagining things I think and say, could you be a little more inventive, brain chips and wind turbine pedof...oh hang, thats pretty inventive.
I dont have a problem with new greener tech..except it rarely does what it says on the box, the problem is it attracts an agenda and a quick browse through the website confirms that its a virtue signalling hub, we can do the tech, but its not going to work if its no more than a cover for a political and ideological push to support the 'right' people having all the control.
Im not sure if youre asking me to back up my claim that the world order has changed in history, so I'll presume you mean the outcome of the great reset plan.
Just ditching fossil fuels alone would result in a new world order.
andDefine New World Order please. Is it the sort of New World Order change that Regan and Thatcher brought in? ...
If it's just "redefines capitalism" - then fine. No problems
What's your specific objection? Or are you actually happy that they are trying to fix some problems?