Embattle
FH is my second home
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 13,656

Former BHS owner jailed for six years for tax evasion
A court heard Dominic Chappell spent the money that was owed on two yachts and a luxury holiday.

It's nothing like that at all m8. It's just a replacement medium of exchange - instead of £ or $ it's bitcoin.
There are significant advantages to not having bank control of money and it cuts out all of the middlemen too - so no VISA charges etc etc. Instant movement of money, very cheaply, to anywhere in the world.
It's also significantly less dodgy than normal money - that $1bn worth of bitcoin the story was about - if that was in $ or £ and held in our banks we'd never have known what was happening with it. As it's held in bitcoin we know where it's gone from, where it's gone to and when - because we can look at the ledger.
The reason banks came out so strongly against it is that it makes them meaningless as a method of transfer - and this whole "it's dodgy" shite - it's because a lot of very rich, very dodgy people would have their financial transactions exposed for ALL to see.
If we have strong identification on currency conversion - (and banks have this already - it's called Know Your Customer) then criminals would literally have nowhere to hide and no way of disguising their payments. - criminals like rogue governments (the UK being prime amongst 'em), er, the royal family?
The point being we don't know - because we can't see what they're doing.
We absolutely will have e-money. That's nailed on. The only thing will be if central banks run the infrastructure themselves and not allow us to be part of the "distributed ledger". - and it's that "distributed ledger" which makes it powerful.
What'll happen is the central banks will run their own bitcoin, tell the public that the rest of the crypto currencies are dodgy and we'll all move onto the dodgy, secret, bank-owned bitcoins and the rich and criminals will stay hidden.
Because we're fucking mugs.
There are two problems with blockchain, one being your own observation that the ore trusted the 'id' of an event the less likely you are to be believed when it turns to shit.It's nothing like that at all m8. It's just a replacement medium of exchange - instead of £ or $ it's bitcoin.
There are significant advantages to not having bank control of money and it cuts out all of the middlemen too - so no VISA charges etc etc. Instant movement of money, very cheaply, to anywhere in the world.
It's also significantly less dodgy than normal money - that $1bn worth of bitcoin the story was about - if that was in $ or £ and held in our banks we'd never have known what was happening with it. As it's held in bitcoin we know where it's gone from, where it's gone to and when - because we can look at the ledger.
The reason banks came out so strongly against it is that it makes them meaningless as a method of transfer - and this whole "it's dodgy" shite - it's because a lot of very rich, very dodgy people would have their financial transactions exposed for ALL to see.
If we have strong identification on currency conversion - (and banks have this already - it's called Know Your Customer) then criminals would literally have nowhere to hide and no way of disguising their payments. - criminals like rogue governments (the UK being prime amongst 'em), er, the royal family?
The point being we don't know - because we can't see what they're doing.
We absolutely will have e-money. That's nailed on. The only thing will be if central banks run the infrastructure themselves and not allow us to be part of the "distributed ledger". - and it's that "distributed ledger" which makes it powerful.
What'll happen is the central banks will run their own bitcoin, tell the public that the rest of the crypto currencies are dodgy and we'll all move onto the dodgy, secret, bank-owned bitcoins and the rich and criminals will stay hidden.
Because we're fucking mugs.
He probably thinks that's "woo".The ledger is the account...
He is a certified ass hat though
Statement or insult?You're such a meme queen
You're such a meme queen
Statement or insult?
definitely not a compliment
I dunno, I'm picturing @BloodOmen waltzing around his lounge in a nice dress pleased to shit with himself![]()
Had the same issue moving from Dubai to the UK. Had to close out the account and start a new one.Anyhoo ran into just this problem with paypal, apparently i created an account back in ~2005 and as an early adopter i slapped 2 factor authentication for password recovery on so they need to call that number and confirm my identity... Its a landline number at an address i have not lived at for 15 years so now that account is locked forever![]()
Had the same issue moving from Dubai to the UK. Had to close out the account and start a new one.
Apparently i was gonna be claire 😱Just spoke to my Dad
He came out with a random comment over the phone
He said if you were born a girl we'd have called you Veronica
![]()
I might change it to Veronica anyway now.
![]()
Scotland becomes first part of UK to ban smacking
Scotland is the 58th country to ban smacking in the home, giving children the same rights as adults.www.bbc.co.uk
hmmm more ferral kids ? Or fewer?
![]()
Scotland becomes first part of UK to ban smacking
Scotland is the 58th country to ban smacking in the home, giving children the same rights as adults.www.bbc.co.uk
hmmm more ferral kids ? Or fewer?
They argue that physical chastisement also leads to a lower quality of parent-child relationship, poorer mental health in childhood and adulthood, as well as higher levels of aggression in the child and more anti-social behaviour.
Apparently i was gonna be claire 😱
I like the name Claire
You should definitely change your name