SPAM This thread is for random spam!!

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,522
...it looks like its going to have to be nasty.
Have to be nasty in a sort of round them all up and stick them in an oven kind of way, you mean?

You are advocating putting these sorts of people in an oven, aren't you? Like your far-right mustachioed friend did with another minority group you're currently hating on, right?


Funny how you want the po-po to "apply the law" in this case, but you're vehemently against them "applying the law" when it comes to stopping idiot scousers from driving around uninsured.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,522
It's been a long time coming, but I never thought I'd see the day when a FH forum member would openly advocate for the wholesale burning of a minority population. :(
 

DaGaffer

Down With That Sorta Thing
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
18,635
No, being forced to move.

In reality, many travellers aren't actually travelling anymore - they usually have bases of a couple of static caravans/houses.

The point is that they need to have agreed places to go - which barely exist anymore even though local councils have a duty to provide somewhere suitable.

What isn't right is if someone considers them unsightly and rings the police even though they've done nothing wrong.

I'm happy you've had a go at gypsies anyway, I was getting worried for a minute until you started slagging off Jews in the other thread ;)

They can have agreed places to go, they're called houses like the fucking rest of us. If they want their own sites, buy some land. Sorry, but this is one "oppressed minority" that can fuck right off.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Im just reflecting the mood across the continent.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Have to be nasty in a sort of round them all up and stick them in an oven kind of way, you mean?

You are advocating putting these sorts of people in an oven, aren't you? Like your far-right mustachioed friend did with another minority group you're currently hating on, right?


Funny how you want the po-po to "apply the law" in this case, but you're vehemently against them "applying the law" when it comes to stopping idiot scousers from driving around uninsured.
Tbh..a lot of scousers basically are pikeys.
 

BloodOmen

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
18,409
When Pikachu's sick of your shit

38842022_140715040169570_7115099009315766272_n.jpg
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
So I log into Uthgard with a microshite account..a frickin advert for Uthgard appeared in my timeline last night.
Now everyone knows Im a nerd.
 

Jupitus

Old and short, no wonder I'm grumpy!
Staff member
Moderator
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 14, 2003
Messages
3,439
So I log into Uthgard with a microshite account..a frickin advert for Uthgard appeared in my timeline last night.
Now everyone knows Im a nerd.

Won't be long before they also know you are a cunt.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,522
Im just reflecting the mood across the continent.
You're not "reflecting" shit. You're doing your level best to create that mood, wherever you can.

Because of people like you...
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
You are starting to sound defeated.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,522
Didn't realise we were having a competition? Defeated at what?

You've already lost at life. Immigrants everywhere in ever increasing numbers, Brexit meaning that the skin colour of those immigrants is going to get darker as they won't be predominantly European but from the rest of the planet, travellers in your back garden, insurance being mandatory - you hate all that. :)
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,522
Poor Brad, stuck his dick in crazy.
I think there should be a cutoff for child support.

She fought for the kids and, predictably, got them. She's a multimillionaire, so can provide completely. So, she got a) what she wanted (divorce + kids) and b) all the cash she'll ever need - yet she's still after "maintenance"?

Maintenance was brought in to help kids not lose out financially from absent fathers who had no interest - so they wouldn't starve, so they could take part in school activities etc. etc.

As far as I'm concerned, if women are to get preferential treatment in getting hold of the children then if they're wealthy then maintenance shouldn't be a thing (works both ways, if the man wants and gets custody and goes to court to obtain that, and can afford it, then he should stump up the costs).

What could be a thing is financial provision for a child's future - maybe paying into an educational fund or suchlike - but I don't think you should be handing over cash to someone who could just spend it on themselves, because they've got enough anyway.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,135
If she presented in a way that he's neglecting the kids she'd get far more support but because she's after money, it makes it lol.
 

Lakih

Resident Freddy
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
1,637
I think there should be a cutoff for child support.

She fought for the kids and, predictably, got them. She's a multimillionaire, so can provide completely. So, she got a) what she wanted (divorce + kids) and b) all the cash she'll ever need - yet she's still after "maintenance"?

Maintenance was brought in to help kids not lose out financially from absent fathers who had no interest - so they wouldn't starve, so they could take part in school activities etc. etc.

As far as I'm concerned, if women are to get preferential treatment in getting hold of the children then if they're wealthy then maintenance shouldn't be a thing (works both ways, if the man wants and gets custody and goes to court to obtain that, and can afford it, then he should stump up the costs).

What could be a thing is financial provision for a child's future - maybe paying into an educational fund or suchlike - but I don't think you should be handing over cash to someone who could just spend it on themselves, because they've got enough anyway.
While I agree with you and, it's a no brainer when it comes to the super rich, it can become a problem at the opposite side of the spectrum. If you make just enough to reach the threshold of no support you might end up with two parents where neither wants the kids because they become a financial burden and would affect their lifestyle.

Disclaimer!: Yes parents of FH, I know you all love your kids, but there's plenty of shit parents out there who cares more about themselves then their offspring.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,522
Didn't need to be said @Lakih - I specified if they already had wealth, and explicitly mentioned what maintenance was for - poor people.

But yep.
 

DaGaffer

Down With That Sorta Thing
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
18,635
I think there should be a cutoff for child support.

She fought for the kids and, predictably, got them. She's a multimillionaire, so can provide completely. So, she got a) what she wanted (divorce + kids) and b) all the cash she'll ever need - yet she's still after "maintenance"?

Maintenance was brought in to help kids not lose out financially from absent fathers who had no interest - so they wouldn't starve, so they could take part in school activities etc. etc.

As far as I'm concerned, if women are to get preferential treatment in getting hold of the children then if they're wealthy then maintenance shouldn't be a thing (works both ways, if the man wants and gets custody and goes to court to obtain that, and can afford it, then he should stump up the costs).

What could be a thing is financial provision for a child's future - maybe paying into an educational fund or suchlike - but I don't think you should be handing over cash to someone who could just spend it on themselves, because they've got enough anyway.

I agree with all that but I’ve noticed rich people stay that way by not spending their own money, plus I have a feeling she’s “asset rich, cash poor” and doesn’t fancy selling any of her many many houses.
 

fettoken

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
9,640
I had one liter of freshly pressed juice again. I'll let you know if It'll all come out in an explosion in about an hour, again. Science!
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,522
I agree with all that but I’ve noticed rich people stay that way by not spending their own money, plus I have a feeling she’s “asset rich, cash poor” and doesn’t fancy selling any of her many many houses.
Fucks given can be counted on no hands.

Assets can be liquidised or borrowed against. That's what they're for...
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,135
Also, this is a church, in America.

lakewood.jpg


I don't remember churches looking like that.

I bet it's got a wicked sound setup.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom