- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 37,490
Nope.What ever they call them they add calories and nutrients to your body so its food.
Read the article.
Nope.What ever they call them they add calories and nutrients to your body so its food.
Ok i read the article. Nothing else to do waiting for food to be provided.Nope.
Read the article.
Poor health? Not just fatness? Pray tell why?Professor [blah]...who led the research team, told..of his deep concern about the links between ultra-processed food with obesity and poor health.
Oh. So these industrial "food" products don't have the "nutriants, vitamins and minerals" that @Moriath claims Prof?People are missing out not only on vitamins and minerals but also bioactive compounds found in natural foods such as phytoestrogens and fibre
Not just low, but very low eh? Much lower in the things that @Moriath claimed?[Dr Blah] Professor of nutrition .. said they had found that ultra-processed foods “have very low nutritional quality ... and they tend to be much lower in proteins, minerals and vitamins"
research shows that [the idea] that “there is no such thing as bad food, just too much food” – is wrong.
Oh. BTW - just thought I'd add this.But how it is in the real world.
Yup the real world is the one everyone lives in. The one in the uk. Or portugal all part of the same real world.Oh. BTW - just thought I'd add this.
It's not how it is in the "real world". It's how it is in fat fat UK. But NOT how it is in other countries (for example Portugal) - where they don't suffer the same obesity and poor health that fat fat UK does.
Must be because they eat, you know, actual food...
But they have nutrients not none. I am not saying its good. Just that itis food.You looked it it, but you didn't read it - I guess fatties will whine, but this is what the experts, who are carrying out actual research (not just writing opinion pieces) said @Moriath:
Poor health? Not just fatness? Pray tell why?
Oh. So these industrial "food" products don't have the "nutriants, vitamins and minerals" that @Moriath claims Prof?
Not just low, but very low eh? Much lower in the things that @Moriath claimed?
It's not how I'd like it defined Moriath. Nice of you to shoot the messenger - but it's how science and the scientists who do food research defines it:
Oooh. Looks like you're flat-out wrong eh? Demonstrably so. Backed by science.
But carry on. Just thought I'd mention it![]()
Actually - I was just pointing out (as did the article) that the UK was very different from the other countries - by having by far the highest industrially ultra-processed intake - something which goes hand in hand with poor health and obesity and is, guess what!, borne out in the figures.Yup the real world is the one everyone lives in. The one in the uk. Or portugal all part of the same real world.
There you go with your own definitions of things again hehe.
Beetroot salad thingy looks very nice, but the chicken thing looks pretty awful tbh. If you're gonna have a "roast", you gotta have some veg? And them potatoes look deep fried?
Aye no veg with the chicken and they were wedgey chip things. But i had a salad with it to get green stuffsBeetroot salad thingy looks very nice, but the chicken thing looks pretty awful tbh. If you're gonna have a "roast", you gotta have some veg? And them potatoes look deep fried?
Purely out of interest, how much capital would you need to invest in the markets in order for you to have sufficient impact if you took all your money out ?
Asking for a comrade.
Billingsgate.Which market?
Which market?
Well, global markets I suppose, if you flood one of them.