Ban all personal vehicles in the city centre, allow lorries, taxis, public transportation and police, ambulances and fire engines.
Make cycling paths
Yep. This 100%. But with the case of cars vs bikes on the road I understand most deaths are simply caused by cars hitting bikes from behind - so there's fuck all you can do about that.Always assume other road users are retarded. Regardless of your mode of transport.
I do believe some peoole bring it on themselves by not being aware of the danger.
Those women in short skirts, they bring rape on themselves. It's their fault.
Where are they going with this?
Gay rights activists welcome NHS quizzing of patients over sexuality
Jesus christ...are you serious with that reply.
Not sure why you don't want doctors to ask about sexuality @Job - you don't have to answer if you don't want to.
If it means the NHS can more effectively treat diseases or take proactive preventative action then why not?
Seriously - can you detail your objection please? Why do you dislike / don't want this to happen?
Not sure why you don't want doctors to ask about sexuality @Job - you don't have to answer if you don't want to.
If it means the NHS can more effectively treat diseases or take proactive preventative action then why not?
Seriously - can you detail your objection please? Why do you dislike / don't want this to happen?
Yup just increase the chances of the pedestrians of getting injured because of your choice of travel.Yep. This 100%. But with the case of cars vs bikes on the road I understand most deaths are simply caused by cars hitting bikes from behind - so there's fuck all you can do about that.
So with the death stats the way they are @Moriath - no. I won't 'take my chances' on the road. Ever.![]()
One death a year. One. Versus hundreds. It's a no brainer. Get over yourself.Yup just increase the chances of the pedestrians of getting injured because of your choice of travel.
Yep. That's my objection too. But it's voluntary, not mandatory, so meh.I'd be loath to share information with the NHS unless absolutely necessary. They're going to be selling it to insurance companies in the next few years when the Tories sell the whole thing to the Americans.
Jesus H, thats the exact kind of thinking that is the concern around the release of such info.I think he has an issue with different sexual identities in general.
They're doing it for exactly the same reason any organisation makes a record of social characteristics. You can't fix a problem you're not aware of.
As for any fears the NHS will sell this information for profit, I think that's laughable. They may divulge anonymized data, but there's absolutely no chance they'll be legally able to sell anything can be linked to an individual.
They're doing it for exactly the same reason any organisation makes a record of social characteristics. You can't fix a problem you're not aware of.
As for any fears the NHS will sell this information for profit, I think that's laughable. They may divulge anonymized data, but there's absolutely no chance they'll be legally able to sell anything can be linked to an individual.
It's laughable that you think that they a) won't sell it, b) don't already sell it and c) that their methods of anonymization are anything other than either i) shite or ii) non-existent.As for any fears the NHS will sell this information for profit, I think that's laughable. They may divulge anonymized data, but there's absolutely no chance they'll be legally able to sell anything can be linked to an individual.
Says the man who lives in a country about to lose its main source of data privacy protection.
"The government publishes very clear rules on how we can use the data, and we adhere to the highest standards of information governance when handling confidential information.""