SPAM This thread is for random spam!!

Gwadien

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
19,925
10431239_10152906655540865_285929827132094542_o.jpg
 
Moriath

Moriath

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
16,209
Got a yummy veggie stew to wake up to tomorrow . Onions, leeks, carrots, potatoes, suede, beetroot, baby sweet corn, mange tout, bulger wheat,

All in a slow cooker to come on and be ready for the evening.

Liquid has garlic, tomato purée, pepper, salt, stock cubes, Worcester sauce.

Gonna be yummy and drive me nuts all day.
 
Bodhi

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,346
old.Tohtori said:
Well that's an oxymoron :p
Click to expand...

Stew as well, you missed stew. Yummie, veggie and stew in the same sentence. Does not compute.

And why have you gone to all that effort and not put any meat in there? Makes it a bit of a pointless dish?
 
Job

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Sooooo, now the Pope sounds like Nigel Farage.
Expect to get punched from an insult to religion and Catholics shoudn't breed like rabbits.

They are going to have to reign him in real quick,
 
Poag

Poag

m00?
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,411
He didn't actually say tho that they should use contraception.

So hes said the same thing every other Pope has, just in a slightly different way. Same old same old.
 
Raven

Raven

Fuck the Tories!
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
44,857
Why? He is actually trying to bring the Catholic cult into the 21st century a bit.

He isn't quite ready to say rubbering up is OK but he will do soon.

At least he isn't completely nuts like the last one.
 
Moriath

Moriath

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
16,209
Bodhi said:
Stew as well, you missed stew. Yummie, veggie and stew in the same sentence. Does not compute.

And why have you gone to all that effort and not put any meat in there? Makes it a bit of a pointless dish?
Click to expand...
I will be having lamb steak on the side with it.
 
Job

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Raven said:
Why? He is actually trying to bring the Catholic cult into the 21st century a bit.

He isn't quite ready to say rubbering up is OK but he will do soon.

At least he isn't completely nuts like the last one.
Click to expand...
You don't bring the catholic faith into the 21st century, it's fundamental message is of absoloutes..words of God encased in stone that transcend all temporary fashion and morality.
To simply update the message to line up with the latest social trends makes a fukin mockery of something that's allready made up.
I can only stand in awe at the mass belief of this utter boloks.
 
old.Tohtori

old.Tohtori

FH is my second home
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
45,210
Job said:
it's fundamental message is of absoloutes..
Click to expand...

Kinda, sorta. "Absolutes" that centuries of translation errors and countless "i think it means..." have skewed and then been remolded by people with power to fit different motives.

The original religion starting texts could have easily said "And lo it was a sunday, and God said; thou shalt eat firecooked piglet slices and watch naked chicks".
 
Job

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Well if they really wanted to bring it into the 21st century a good idea would be to admit it's all made up and reinvent themselves as a secular charity.
 
DaGaffer

DaGaffer

Down With That Sorta Thing
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
18,516
Job said:
You don't bring the catholic faith into the 21st century, it's fundamental message is of absoloutes..words of God encased in stone that transcend all temporary fashion and morality.
To simply update the message to line up with the latest social trends makes a fukin mockery of something that's allready made up.
I can only stand in awe at the mass belief of this utter boloks.
Click to expand...

They've updated the Catholic Church loads of times. Look up "Vatican 2" for a major example.
 
Bodhi

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,346
So after a week of Je Suis Charlie, and various people wanting to protect free speech at all costs, the joyless lentil knitters have succeeded in getting rid of Page 3. Whilst it's hardly titivating these days, there does seem to be the usual double standards at work from the PC mob. So free speech is ok, as long as the lady in question has her clothes on?

Surely if they find it so offensive they could, I dunno, just not read The Sun? I mean I find quite a lot of Guardian comment objectionable (and badly spelt, and mostly wrong), however I have managed to sidestep any piss boiling moments by just not reading it?

I really do fear for the future of this country. Everything even remotely fun and interesting is on the PC mob's present of future ban list, so the rest of us can live just as tedious a life as they do.
 
Billargh

Billargh

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Oct 29, 2007
Messages
6,481
Luckily enough I've recently left my job that allowed me to 'read' The Sun on my break (it was either that or Metro) so now I just look at boobs online, much more variety.

Not that I'm saying getting rid of Page 3 is a good thing, it's totally ridiculous.
 
Moriath

Moriath

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
16,209
Bodhi said:
So after a week of Je Suis Charlie, and various people wanting to protect free speech at all costs, the joyless lentil knitters have succeeded in getting rid of Page 3. Whilst it's hardly titivating these days, there does seem to be the usual double standards at work from the PC mob. So free speech is ok, as long as the lady in question has her clothes on?

Surely if they find it so offensive they could, I dunno, just not read The Sun? I mean I find quite a lot of Guardian comment objectionable (and badly spelt, and mostly wrong), however I have managed to sidestep any piss boiling moments by just not reading it?

I really do fear for the future of this country. Everything even remotely fun and interesting is on the PC mob's present of future ban list, so the rest of us can live just as tedious a life as they do.
Click to expand...
But then with the pc's freedom of speech they have the right to protest against what they dislike as much as we have that we disagree with he,
 
Edmond

Edmond

Is now wearing thermals.....Brrrrr
Moderator
Joined
Apr 21, 2008
Messages
11,537
Gonna sound odd coming from me, but I always have thought it strange that they have got away with tits in a national newspaper for so long. Don't get me wrong, I'm not against it, live and let live as far as I'm concerned.

At the end of the day, if you don't want to see tits in your paper, but another one, there's loads to choose from, same as complaining about TV shows, turn over the channel. I don't buy a paper, never have so it doesn't bother me either way
 
Bodhi

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,346
I'm not even sure if I get the demeaning to women argument, as as far as I know, none of these women are forced at gunpoint to appear, in fact most of them seem to quite enjoy it. So effectively, the shrieking minority are now dictating what these women do with their bodies.

As mentioned, double standards. I have no issue at all with the centre folds in Cosmopolitan, and would be horrified if someone tried to ban them on my behalf.

edit - I bet the French and the Dutch are absolutely pissing their sides at this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)
Top Bottom