Politics The General Election 2015

Who will you vote for?!

  • Green Party

    Votes: 7 11.1%
  • Monster Raving Loony Party

    Votes: 3 4.8%
  • Conservative Party

    Votes: 21 33.3%
  • Labour Party

    Votes: 6 9.5%
  • United Kingdom Independence Party

    Votes: 4 6.3%
  • British National Party

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Liberal Democrats Party

    Votes: 4 6.3%
  • Other

    Votes: 3 4.8%
  • None

    Votes: 10 15.9%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 5 7.9%

  • Total voters
    63

DaGaffer

Down With That Sorta Thing
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
18,498
in an aside, the Dutch provincial elections, and the water board (yes, ladies!) elections are upcoming. I read the party lists and there is nobody I can be arsed voting for. I kinda feel bad, because usually I kind of like participating in a democracy. Prolly also has to do with the fact that the party I am a member of is not represented in these elections. Oh well.

You're a member of a political party? Really? How...not apathetic of you. You're making me uncomfortable.
 

Mabs

J Peasemould Gruntfuttock
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
6,869
in an aside, the Dutch provincial elections, and the water board (yes, ladies!) elections are upcoming. I read the party lists and there is nobody I can be arsed voting for. I kinda feel bad, because usually I kind of like participating in a democracy. Prolly also has to do with the fact that the party I am a member of is not represented in these elections. Oh well.

cant you get yourself nominated as a candidate ?
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
19,914
Why should he?

I don't get it why politicians now have to promise certain things, and if they don't, they're cowards.

A SNP-Labour coalition makes more sense than a Tory-LibDems coalition.
 

TdC

Trem's hunky sex love muffin
Joined
Dec 20, 2003
Messages
30,925
You're a member of a political party? Really? How...not apathetic of you. You're making me uncomfortable.

I'm not an active member. Still, who knows what will happen after I get my paper :)
 

Mabs

J Peasemould Gruntfuttock
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
6,869
I'm not an active member. Still, who knows what will happen after I get my paper :)

Chamberlain_Munich.jpg


?
:(
 

TdC

Trem's hunky sex love muffin
Joined
Dec 20, 2003
Messages
30,925
yesssss. YESSSSSSS!!! *cackle*



actually...isn't that Chamberlain?
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
It would seem rather obvious that if you are on benefits you are pretty well guaranteed to vote Labour so as to keep the gravy train going....surely claiming benefits should exempt you from the political process due to obvious bias
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
19,914
It would seem rather obvious that if you are on benefits you are pretty well guaranteed to vote Labour so as to keep the gravy train going....surely claiming benefits should exempt you from the political process due to obvious bias

I can't express how many facepalms this deserves.

Does this mean we should ban people who have racist criminal records to stop voting UKIP.

Does this mean we should stop hippies voting Green Party?

Does this mean we should stop rich people voting Tory?

Does this mean we should stop nutters voting Monster Raving Looney Party?

'Fuk' sake man.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
No..but being on benefits is different to all the above..none of those ideologys are paying you to live..in any other scenario whatsoever the conflict would exempt you from voting, but doleys are allowed to vote for the one party that practically guarantees them an easy life.
If you banned doleites you can bet you bottom dollar labour would lose 80% of those votes.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
19,914
No..but being on benefits is different to all the above..none of those ideologys are paying you to live..in any other scenario whatsoever the conflict would exempt you from voting, but doleys are allowed to vote for the one party that practically guarantees them an easy life.
If you banned doleites you can bet you bottom dollar labour would lose 80% of those votes.

No, that is fucking ridiculous.

You're only saying that because you see them as a scrounger, but the rich are equally going to vote for the Tories.

We live in a democracy, we allowed the workers to have the vote a 100 years ago, fuck going back to that system.

I think if someone is caught dodging and avoiding tax, they should be banned from voting.
 

Mabs

J Peasemould Gruntfuttock
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
6,869
was wondering why you were typing gibberish Gwad, then realised it cos i have the sad troll cunt ignored :(
 

Jupitus

Old and short, no wonder I'm grumpy!
Staff member
Moderator
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 14, 2003
Messages
3,362
No..but being on benefits is different to all the above..none of those ideologys are paying you to live..in any other scenario whatsoever the conflict would exempt you from voting, but doleys are allowed to vote for the one party that practically guarantees them an easy life.
If you banned doleites you can bet you bottom dollar labour would lose 80% of those votes.

I've depended on benefits for the last few months, but I sure as hell won't vote labour.

Job, that's such a twattish assumption.....
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Well you would be in the 20%..it would take a liberal with double barrel hippy balls to deny that most doleys...if they bother...would vote for more dole.
 

Ormorof

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,887
The percentage of people who are "doleys" would have an entirely negligible effect on the vote, if they bothered to vote at all
 

Raven

Fuck the Tories!
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
44,800
I saw some Labour cow get torn apart on Andrew Mar this morning, asking her why Labour insist people are still in shit when all signs suggest we are pretty much back to pre-crash.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
36,689
I saw some Labour cow get torn apart on Andrew Mar this morning, asking her why Labour insist people are still in shit when all signs suggest we are pretty much back to pre-crash.
could be that zero.hours contracts and the like and the massive explosion of wealth for the already wealthy show that the recovery hasn't been for the working classes.

If you're on a zero hours contract you clearly ARE in the shit - and since labour is supposed to be the party of labour then I'd say they were doing their job and pointing out the obvious?
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
19,914
I saw some Labour cow get torn apart on Andrew Mar this morning, asking her why Labour insist people are still in shit when all signs suggest we are pretty much back to pre-crash.

Yeah, pretty much as @Scouse said, it's alright financially, but is that finance coming to help out people in their ever day lives?

No, there's still huge cuts and people are suffering compared to the pre-crash.

Which could put arguments which would rightly say well, we were spending money we didn't have.

But equally, you could now say they're cutting too much, and look at the impact its having on people.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
36,689
well, we were spending money we didn't have
Printed it for the banks tho eh?

When the rich stood to lose, the poor took on shitloads of debt and suffered unprecedented cuts to their essential services...
 

Ormorof

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,887
Yes its amazing how much the free market evangelicals suddenly become pro government interference when its their share prices that might suffer

as has been stated, privatize profits, socialize losses
 

Gumbo

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
2,361
It's not much of a story until the study becomes policy. You're being suckered into lefty propaganda. I would be more surprised if someone in the Labour party hadn't commissioned the exact same research, so they would have the figures to hand should the tories come up with any of these proposals. WHICH THEY HAVEN'T!
 

Raven

Fuck the Tories!
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
44,800
I think I am pretty much settled on voting Tory now, I like that my standard of living has gone up under a Tory government, I like the fact I am paying less tax and I like the fact my job and the company I work for a secure an an industry that was basically dead thanks to Labour.

It would be a disaster if Labour got in, an absolute nightmare situation.

That being said...

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/p...liband-the-battle-for-number-10-10138526.html
 

Mabs

J Peasemould Gruntfuttock
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
6,869
i as going to vote green, but i might be tempted to labour with the NHS profit cap thing they mentioned previously
selfservatives can die in a puddle of their own piss tbh, and so can the Liberal "i want my 5 minutes of fame, watch me ruin the legacy of the party cos im a cunt of a leader" Democrats
 

Mabs

J Peasemould Gruntfuttock
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
6,869
cos selling off nationaly owned things is such a good idea , that is if youre a greddy cunt, or "conservative" as they like to call themselves, in it for a quick few (million) quid

post office? east coast train line ? any of this ring a bell ?

you take 10 things, 5 profit, 5 loss. it balances.

you sell the 5 profit things, OMG THE REST IS FAILING CLOSE IT DOWN.

these things COULD work if people stopped fucking stealing them and selling them off for personal profit, so yea, a "Profit cap" on nhs is a good thing, people dont want to buy it, let it run as it fucking well should.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom