J
jox
Guest
Delete
C
Carlos Bananos
Guest
- Thread starter
- #2
will be the same as the best one before 1.62 
S
salamurhaaja
Guest
- Thread starter
- #3
Thoughts about CB spec.
axe50
la14
stealth32
cs44
venom29
Last debuff + decent la [14+18].
SB win-button=purge. If it's down, I will loose other assassins. If it's up, I have good chance of winnig.
Inf win-button=enervating+df [followed by cs-chain]+purge
NS win-button= stun-attack+RA's+purge
So SB should be in line whit whit other assassins?
No.
Enervatings hurt too much.
Damage when enervated.
Damage when not enervated.
Screens shows that my average damage is reduced by 34% after enervating.
Infils claim that after 1.62 we are in same line. Maybe that's true when we fight against non-asassins.
But CB SB vs CB Inf infils have huge advantage.
1) stun attack
2) enervating
Only way to win infil is to outdamage him [Sb CB has no stun] and that's hard, 34% dama reduce from enervating and dragonfang = impossible whitout purge.
GG, 30 minutes waiting from each fight
axe50
la14
stealth32
cs44
venom29
Last debuff + decent la [14+18].
SB win-button=purge. If it's down, I will loose other assassins. If it's up, I have good chance of winnig.
Inf win-button=enervating+df [followed by cs-chain]+purge
NS win-button= stun-attack+RA's+purge
So SB should be in line whit whit other assassins?
No.
Enervatings hurt too much.
Damage when enervated.
Damage when not enervated.
Screens shows that my average damage is reduced by 34% after enervating.
Infils claim that after 1.62 we are in same line. Maybe that's true when we fight against non-asassins.
But CB SB vs CB Inf infils have huge advantage.
1) stun attack
2) enervating
Only way to win infil is to outdamage him [Sb CB has no stun] and that's hard, 34% dama reduce from enervating and dragonfang = impossible whitout purge.
GG, 30 minutes waiting from each fight
C
Carlos Bananos
Guest
- Thread starter
- #4
Originally posted by salamurhaaja
Thoughts about CB spec.
axe50
la14
stealth32
cs44
venom29
Last debuff + decent la [14+18].
SB win-button=purge. If it's down, I will loose other assassins. If it's up, I have good chance of winnig.
Inf win-button=enervating+df [followed by cs-chain]+purge
NS win-button= stun-attack+RA's+purge
So SB should be in line whit whit other assassins?
No.
Enervatings hurt too much.
Damage when enervated.
Damage when not enervated.
Screens shows that my average damage is reduced by 34% after enervating.
Infils claim that after 1.62 we are in same line. Maybe that's true when we fight against non-asassins.
But CB SB vs CB Inf infils have huge advantage.
1) stun attack
2) enervating
Only way to win infil is to outdamage him [Sb CB has no stun] and that's hard, 34% dama reduce from enervating and dragonfang = impossible whitout purge.
GG, 30 minutes waiting from each fight
Cool, how long you been playing 1.62?
The SBs on US are doing fine, as long as they're equally/better equipped, buffed and RR etc.
S
salamurhaaja
Guest
- Thread starter
- #5
I will respec to CB as soon as I get respec stone
= 1.62.hopefully tonight Haven't played 1.62 yet.
Yes it all comes to buffs, relics, realm ranks. But when they are equal, infils got upper hand at 1.62.
R
Runolaz
Guest
- Thread starter
- #6
Have you played it??
...and BS, according to all data provided they are gutted vs equall opponents. The SB that still are doing ok are camping DF where there are few INF arround. Both INF and NS outdmg a CB using CS that either use 2H or 1H/OH, cuz of Env hitts the SB 2x. I've even seen INF's complaining cuz he easiliy killed RR5+ SB's...lol
...other than that I'm all with Salamurhaaja.
F
froler-mid
Guest
- Thread starter
- #7
well....the new fotm in alb seems too be slash infils, soo your enverting will hurt as much on 'those' infils as they do on sb's.
(runolas and salurmurrjaj whine too much imo)
(runolas and salurmurrjaj whine too much imo
)
R
Runolaz
Guest
- Thread starter
- #8
Originally posted by froler-mid
(runolas and salurmurrjaj whine too much imo
nooooo we wote for Remi...king of SB :wub:
H
Haldar
Guest
- Thread starter
- #9
u are wrong.
numbers of slash infi's are decreasing. bcoz the only good targets for slash infi's are SB's (close to extinct on US), zerkers and savages and hib scale users. slash infi was an answer to SZ template - sacrifice all for better damage vs SBs. And now thrust infis can mow SB's down too - so slash becomes less desirable. Dfang4tehwin etc...
N
nightsorrow
Guest
- Thread starter
- #10
F
froler-mid
Guest
- Thread starter
- #11
check the alb boards, more question about slash spec etc, i advice most infils too goo slash ingame too
and lul at gimped sbs in US.
M
minime_
Guest
- Thread starter
- #12
Someone might have heard me say this before;
50slash50dw4tehwin
And ill be a gimpy CB btw :>
50slash50dw4tehwin
And ill be a gimpy CB btw :>
C
-chancer-
Guest
- Thread starter
- #13
i am sooo not respeccing to critblade
41sword
44leftaxe
36 stealth
37 envenom
10 crit
atm an hopeing to stay that way
41sword
44leftaxe
36 stealth
37 envenom
10 crit
atm an hopeing to stay that way
O
old.anubis
Guest
- Thread starter
- #14
should i explain _why_ you are being nerfed?
G
greenfingers
Guest
- Thread starter
- #15
nice1 anubis
C
Carlos Bananos
Guest
- Thread starter
- #16
they all seem to think 500 damage per round is perfectly acceptable when being hit back for 90 etc
Now everyone can roll propper classes an mid can do smth in rvr ;D
T
thrylos
Guest
- Thread starter
- #17
nooooooooooooo
Z
Zoldot
Guest
- Thread starter
- #18
Yes pls
N
nightsorrow
Guest
- Thread starter
- #19
Originally posted by salamurhaaja
I will respec to CB as soon as I get respec stone
Haven't played 1.62 yet.
Yes it all comes to buffs, relics, realm ranks. But when they are equal, infils got upper hand at 1.62.
atleast you didnt mention SKILL
thats best to have imo
U
ulke
Guest
- Thread starter
- #20
Originally posted by Carlos Bananos
they all seem to think 500 damage per round is perfectly acceptable when being hit back for 90 etc
Now everyone can roll propper classes an mid can do smth in rvr ;D
Hard to make a good rvr-grp without healers/skald (they are exping alts or somethin) thats why we see so many sb's......not couse they are uber etc...
Ask yourself, why did you start your sb ?
Its "the waiting at tk for a decent rvr-grp" that creates sb's/hunters...
hmm, this reply ended up as a whine at all the waiting at tk
F
froler-mid
Guest
- Thread starter
- #21
lol at that list, Anubis t.t
1. shammy bot
2. shadowblade
3. healur bot for 1.62
T_T_T_T_T_Tt
nerf is goood.
(id guess alb ones would look the same tho t.t)
1. shammy bot
2. shadowblade
3. healur bot for 1.62
T_T_T_T_T_Tt
nerf is goood.
(id guess alb ones would look the same tho t.t)
C
Carlos Bananos
Guest
- Thread starter
- #22
Originally posted by ulke
Hard to make a good rvr-grp without healers/skald (they are exping alts or somethin) thats why we see so many sb's......not couse they are uber etc...
Ask yourself, why did you start your sb ?
Its "the waiting at tk for a decent rvr-grp" that creates sb's/hunters...
hmm, this reply ended up as a whine at all the waiting at tk
I started my SB because it seemed a fun class to play, i had the intent of being a critblade, i started it long long ago, when i had no idea what an assasin was. So not rlly the uber factor.
But LA is overpowered, with only 39 spec (and 36weapon) i can hit 2-3 times harder on an anytime style, than other rogues can on positionals, and often PA..
i due to a combination of v.heavy styles and nice evade, i can kill main tanks pretty easly with little risk.
Ever been hit my an infil or NS for 600-700 dmg...?.....mid fight.
O
old.anubis
Guest
- Thread starter
- #23
sure it is ^^
so you're next
1 Cleric 12,301
2 Infiltrator 9,885
3 Paladin 8,884
4 Wizard 8,747
5 Scout 7,415
6 Necromancer 6,852 <= LOL
7 Armsman 6,449
8 Friar 6,009
9 Minstrel 5,520
10 Theurgist 4,389
11 Sorcerer 4,309
12 Cabalist 3,585
13 Reaver 3,012
14 Mercenary 2,881
added:
and hib one, just for comparison
1 Enchanter 8,379
2 Druid 8,200
3 Nightshade 7,991
4 Bard 7,658
5 Ranger 7,214
6 Hero 5,893
7 Eldritch 5,544
8 Mentalist 4,941
9 Warden 4,863
10 Champion 4,316
11 Blademaster 2,373
12 Valewalker 2,258
13 Animist 1,798
R
Rollie_David
Guest
- Thread starter
- #24
carlos bananos the last honest shadowblade, how are you my son
H
Haldar
Guest
- Thread starter
- #25
ohh....
why do shadowblades still lose to infiltrators then?
my mainhand damage on infi - 230 normal and 130-150 enervated. offhand - 30-40.
sure, most infi's main hits me for 90-120! but their offhand kicks for 70-90!
and there goes the usual info about our sucky ra's, armor, damage type, damage dealing attributes, lack of evade-based stun etc, etc...
and we got 3 str relics on our server.
E
Ebonn
Guest
- Thread starter
- #26
lol
S
stinkie
Guest
- Thread starter
- #27
not surprised at all coming from jox. he rolls the most over powered mid class. then gets a buff bot then refuses to leave mtk without 7 mates all buffed.
pretty clear you'd hate to play a class that was on an even playing field to the rest imo.
On the spec side, Id suggest CB template. I got PA'd by a CB last night when duoing with riasen and even with bot of us wacking him I came out with a slither of health(thought bleed was gonna kill me) so as for not having a chance v infs ur sorely wrong. ur just gonna have to try n land PA now instead of DF4TEHWIN
C
-chancer-
Guest
- Thread starter
- #28
no SB uses' DF its just tooo end heavy unless they (within 10mins) got End regen 5 even then with end regen 5 you still run out of end!!
H
horil
Guest
- Thread starter
- #29
Re: Re: The best shadowbladetemplate after 1.62
Sorry to interrupt your dreams, but I would add I know quite many sb's and none of them is spamming df, k thx.
Personaly I prefer snowblind and comeback as back-up
Regards,
Sorry to interrupt your dreams, but I would add I know quite many sb's and none of them is spamming df, k thx.
Personaly I prefer snowblind and comeback as back-up
Regards,
H
horil
Guest
- Thread starter
- #30
No, roll a hunter