Stop Bush Rallies

[Ceap]

So anyone going? Or got funkeh plans to disrupt Public Enemy #1's visit?

 

[Kagato.]

Don't see why everyone hates him so much to be honest, he's no worse then any of the other presidents they've had so far.

 

[--Random--]

lol i'll go as long as i can take a fucking machine gun to slaughter all the lefty wankers with. i wanna go shake his hand and tell him how much of a good job he's doing.. g w bush is god.

 

[Ceap]

bush is a bad, bad man...

naughteh OT'ers

 

[Conchabar]

Originally posted by Kagato.
Don't see why everyone hates him so much to be honest, he's no worse then any of the other presidents they've had so far.

lol lmao that was funny

 

[--Random--]

the majority of people only hate him coz thats the 'cool' thing to do, fuck the system and all that. whereas in actual fact, he's doing a good job. he's had to make some feckin nasty decisions. lets look at it this way, after 9/11, if he'd just sat there and done absolutely nothing what would the public of america have done? they'd have been proper pissed off with him, there'd have been riots and everything. its better he looked asthough he was doing something rather than just sitting there waiting for another 9/11. plus, he's in iraq for good reasons. i dont think people quite understand what saddam was like.. and what its like under his regime, also the other fact is that he probably DID have weapons of mass destruction, the only reason they werent found is simply because iraq is such a vast country, it'd be so so easy to hide/destroy them without the americans knowing. i mean, he could have some underground bunker in the middle of the desert with all his weapons in, and there'd be no way for us to find it.

 

[Conchabar]

Originally posted by --Random--
the majority of people only hate him coz thats the 'cool' thing to do, fuck the system and all that. whereas in actual fact, he's doing a good job. he's had to make some feckin nasty decisions. lets look at it this way, after 9/11, if he'd just sat there and done absolutely nothing what would the public of america have done? they'd have been proper pissed off with him, there'd have been riots and everything. its better he looked asthough he was doing something rather than just sitting there waiting for another 9/11. plus, he's in iraq for good reasons. i dont think people quite understand what saddam was like.. and what its like under his regime, also the other fact is that he probably DID have weapons of mass destruction, the only reason they werent found is simply because iraq is such a vast country, it'd be so so easy to hide/destroy them without the americans knowing. i mean, he could have some underground bunker in the middle of the desert with all his weapons in, and there'd be no way for us to find it.

no he suxs and hes an idiot

mm y did he attack iraq well he wanted there oil
was it iraq that attacked america in 9/11 no

u know nothing stfu imho

 

[--Random--]

Originally posted by Conchabar
no he suxs and hes an idiot

good come back, ok you've convinced me.. im wrong.

 

[--Random--]

Originally posted by Conchabar
no he suxs and hes an idiot

mm y did he attack iraq well he wanted there oil
was it iraq that attacked america in 9/11 no

u know nothing stfu imho

christ, so this is what we have in britain 'against' george bush.. no wonder he takes no notice.

for starters, of course he wants they're oil, who wouldnt, its worth a fucking fortune and we dont want them wasting it. secondly, it was al-quieda that attacked america, al-quieda is made of crazy anti western muslims, from any country. some probably were from iraq. thirdly, he didnt attack them because THEY did it, he attacked them to prevent further attacks against the US and its allies, he couldnt risk saddam supplying terrorists like al-quieda with weapons of mass destruction. if they can cause that much devestation with 2 planes, what could they do with 2 nuclear weapons?

 

[Ceap]

i think people don't like him because he has a) a bloody dodgy past, involving insider trading and all sorts of nasty dealings... b) he openily attempted to mislead us regarding Iraq's dangers (Uranium from Niger; Iraq funding Al Qaeda) c) people still remember the elections, and Jeb Bush's attempt / success in preventing black voters registering / voting (they predominaly vote democrat) d) the bribery that took place over resolution 1441 d) his withdrawal from the Nuclear Non-Froliferation treaty and the Kyoto Agreeement and e) Guantanamo bay...

 

[Cyfr]

Lets nuke the whole world just to make sure they never attack !!

Good idea Random.

 

[--Random--]

Originally posted by Ceap
i think people don't like him because he has a) a bloody dodgy past, involving insider trading and all sorts of nasty dealings... b) he openily attempted to mislead us regarding Iraq's dangers (Uranium from Niger; Iraq funding Al Qaeda) c) people still remember the elections, and Jeb Bush's attempt / success in preventing black voters registering / voting (they predominaly vote democrat) d) the bribery that took place over resolution 1441 d) his withdrawal from the Nuclear Non-Froliferation treaty and the Kyoto Agreeement and e) Guantanamo bay...

god i hate it when people bring all these bollock facts into play. i dont give a shit about ANY of that, all i know is i agree with GW. my mate is due out in iraq in early january, he's been telling me stories of life out in iraq he's heard from fellow squadies arriving back... its not a nice place, it needs sorting out. if we withdrew now we'd be doing far worse than good. at the end of the day, we've toppled saddam which is a definate plus, now we need to sort the country out and help it back onto its feet.

 

[--Random--]

Originally posted by Cyfr
Lets nuke the whole world just to make sure they never attack !!

Good idea Random.

what would you have suggested america to do directly after the 9/11 attacks?

 

[Aoami]

Originally posted by --Random--
what would you have suggested america to do directly after the 9/11 attacks?

Hmm....communicate with them instead of invading?

 

[--Random--]

Originally posted by Aoami
Hmm....communicate with them instead of invading?

ROFLMAO, just like they communicated with us by flying 2 jets into 2 buildings full of innocent people and killing nearly 3000?

k

 

[legot]

Originally posted by --Random--


secondly, it was al-quieda that attacked america, al-quieda is made of crazy anti western muslims, from any country. some probably were from iraq.

Still the country were not al-quieda the IRA get memebers from Ireland does that give Britian the right to attack Ireland? (bad example..)
if bush did'nt do anything i doubt there would of been riots in america as the media would of spun it in such a way the majority agreed with what they were doing.
America took the oil so Iraq would'nt waste it and you think thats a good reason? if you were eating and ice-cream would i be justified to kick you in the crotch and take it on the grounds you don't like it as much as me so you'd be wasting it in comparison..

 

[Aoami]

Originally posted by --Random--
ROFLMAO, just like they communicated with us by flying 2 jets into 2 buildings full of innocent people and killing nearly 3000?

k

Who did? The Iraqi's? I don't think so.

 

[Ceap]

how can u agree with someone only by ignoring the bad points? 'All that shit' etc is, unfortunately, why we dont like him. not coz its 'cool', because he is a danger to the rest of the world.

 

[legot]

Originally posted by --Random--
god i hate it when people bring all these bollock facts into play.

Yeah the truth hurts...

 

[Conchabar]

Originally posted by legot
if you were eating and ice-cream would i be justified to kick you in the crotch and take it on the grounds you don't like it as much as me so you'd be wasting it in comparison..

thats a good idea

 

[Cyfr]

What they did right after 9/11 was correct IMO.

They made some fuckups but the general idea of freeing Afgan and trying to get rid of Al Qaeda well done.

Attacking Iraq.. now thats a different matter.

Iraq had NO chemical weapons. This was the main 'threat'.
What would have happened if Iraq started bombing America? America have hunderds of nuclear bombs (and seemingly a crazy ruler)..

It would have been chaos, but if America attacks someone 'in the name of freedom' its a-ok.

 

[Ceap]

Originally posted by Aoami
Hmm....communicate with them instead of invading?

Pakistan offered to broker a deal between the Taliban + Al Qaeda with the US... if, and only if, Osama was tried in the ICC in the Hague...

oops, forgot that from the US p-o-v ICC doesnt exist! silly me

 

[Aoami]

Originally posted by Ceap
how can u agree with someone only by ignoring the bad points? 'All that shit' etc is, unfortunately, why we dont like him. not coz its 'cool', because he is a danger to the rest of the world.

I don't think he is a danger to the rest of the world, well not him personally anyway. IMO he's simply a messenger and the desicions are made mostly by his cabinet becuase he's really stupid and they can manipulate him.

 

[Ceap]

but he's dangerous precisely because he is manipulatable

 

[Aoami]

I guess so.

 

[Ceap]

Back to topic... anyone going to marches etc????

 

[--Random--]

Originally posted by Ceap
Back to topic... anyone going to marches etc????

no, im not gay.

 

[Ceap]

hush we guessed that etc

 

[Cyfr]

Originally posted by --Random--
no, im not gay.

OMGz lolozl im gay because I dont want a retarded man to kill more inocent people !11`

*gos off to shag his b/f*

 

[shadybrack]

Originally posted by Ceap
So anyone going? Or got funkeh plans to disrupt Public Enemy #1's visit?

know wut ur like about these things ceap, so wut u gonna do wen u c him?

edit: (i did an edit not another post!! xD) ceap u not use msn anymore?!?!