fettoken
I am a FH squatter
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2004
- Messages
- 9,640
Squash?
More like, *splosh*
Squash?
It's not the same at all. Published science papers are already peer-reviewed by other scientists who know a lot more about the validity of the methodology that you do. If they fail peer-review they don't get through.
I review other people's designs and criticise the shit out of them all the time but then I'm the only person doing the review and I know more about what it should look like than other fuckers. That's not at all like scientific peer-review.
I've already tried that with @leggy but he doesn't accept it...But the point still holds that someone more qualified than you already has.
Thy wasn't disputedBut the point still holds that someone more qualified than you already has.
He has his own PSC offering personal IT services in Birmingham. No bumming currently,Bet you don't know where Summo is. Or who he's bumming.
Fish sucks. Beef rules. And No!!Aaaaaand close! We're here every night folks! Tip your waitress, and remember to try the fish!
And jamie oliver is exstatic about it. Wonder when they start taxing oxygen cause too much can be halmful.
I only evr drink diet drinks. Ie no sugar. But it shouuld be personal choice . Im sure there are many highly educated people who drink full fat coke not just mouth breathers as you so pleasently put it. Some people drink them and dont have fat issues so why should they get taxed.Stupid law but if it's the only way to stop fuckwits from living off sugary drinks then so be it.
I would prefer to not have to pay extra for the odd sugary drink because mouth breathers cannot function properly but hey ho.
Stupid law but if it's the only way to stop fuckwits from living off sugary drinks then so be it.
I would prefer to not have to pay extra for the odd sugary drink because mouth breathers cannot function properly but hey ho.
I only evr drink diet drinks. Ie no sugar. But it shouuld be personal choice . Im sure there are many highly educated people who drink full fat coke not just mouth breathers as you so pleasently put it. Some people drink them and dont have fat issues so why should they get taxed.
Its a case of making those who can afford it to pay for those kids who might be fat. Cause thtose who cant afford the increase will just spoon sugar into their tea and coffee.
Doesnt affect starbucks with their huge sugary drinks either.
Great.
But the chavs still drink it like water and no amount of attempted education will stop them.
So fuck it, might as well rinse the stupid fuckers.
Mass generalisation. Like saying all spiks are greasey. I know a few people on the breadline that dont guzzle high sugar pop. So you know little apart fro. What you consume on channel 5Great.
But the chavs still drink it like water and no amount of attempted education will stop them.
So fuck it, might as well rinse the stupid fuckers.
They weren't chavs then. Just tourists.a friend of mine once got mugged at knife by a pair of chavs point in a very posh part of Surrey, he was jogging and had 50p on him, he saw one of the guys the next day who gave him back his 50p because "they were just having a laugh"
bored rich kids can also be chavs
A chav is not a poor person, a chav is a chav...