Fana
Fledgling Freddie
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2003
- Messages
- 2,181
Meh, rant over. I'm sure there's a point in there somewhere....
Im sure there isnt
Meh, rant over. I'm sure there's a point in there somewhere....
Surely waking up drenched in piss is a sign of having a good night....
Meh, rant over. I'm sure there's a point in there somewhere....
Im sure there isnt

Im sure there isnt
Go to work, get home, go to bed, get up, go to work, get paid, have half you're money taken off you in taxes, go to bed.. And people wonder why everyone gets pissed all the time..
where-by we'll soon have to seek permission before each fart.
"Ill fucking get wasted 5 days a week if i fucking want to and anyone else that does so is in their full right to do so! Society can fuck off, im the centre of the fucking world and ill do whatever the fuck i want" etc.
You know the values of humanity have gone down the drain when people think its *wrong* for a government to care about the health and well-being of its citizens. Its simple - serving alcohol to people that are already drunk damages them and has a high risk of causing damage to people in their surroundings, therefore it is *wrong*. Logic follows that it is a good thing for a government to want to limit this.
fucking nancy thread...........
toady liberals.......
last time i looked it wasn't illegal to get drunk, the whole country is an alky, i blame the government![]()
No, no, no. You are so wrong I don't know where to begin. It is not the job of government to tell people how to live their lives. Putting aside the fact that the government doesn't really give a fuck about "the health and well-being of its citizens" anyway, the government is supposed to be the servant of the people, not the other way around.
As all those "self-centred" people have already pointed out on here, so-called binge drinking is nothing new, most people grow out of it, but we have a massively paternalistic government that just can't stop interfering in people's lives, because they genuinely believe that we shouldn't be allowed to think for ourselves. If people damage themselves, that's their problem, and if they damage their surroundings, there are a shitload of existing laws to deal with that.
Labour have created over three thousand new laws since they came to power, and yet people probably feel less safe than ever, and yet here you are, advocating yet more.
the government is supposed to be the servant of the people, not the other way around.
Exactly, and serving the people means doing what is best for the people. It means implementing and enforcing rules that may not be to the individuals taste but that benefit society as a whole and creates less suffering in the long run.
Alot of people need protecting from themselves though, and as an extension people need to be protected from those that have little selfcontrol. As i said earlier in the thread, letting those with no selfcontrol fuck themselves up usually means Bad Things happen to people in their enviroment.
And that's where I will never agree with you. Most people don't need protecting from themselves, and making laws for the minority that do is counter-productive, because it encourages less self-reliance overall. As far bad things happening in their environment, I've said it time and again, there are plenty of existing laws to deal with that.
And yet alcohol abuse is one of the primary causes for suffering in the world.
Is it bollocks. Ask an AIDS-patient in Uganda, or an Afghan who's just had their house blown up, or a starving refugee in Darfur about our petty obsessions with the fallout from a Saturday-night pissup before you make such banal statements.
One. of.
and the word "primary". And its just not true. Look at the WHO list of top killers (they divide it by rich, middle and poor countries) and booze doesn't appear at all. The obsession with the evils of drink is primarily a northern European (and its former colonies) one, and its an obsession blown out of all proportion. In fact for every individual who drinks themselves to death or becomes an alcoholic wife-beater, there are probably thousands more who's lives are extended my moderate drinking.
I'm not saying sustained excessive boozing is something to be encouraged, but neither are "we know what's good for you" governments.
Alot of people need protecting from themselves though, and as an extension people need to be protected from those that have little selfcontrol. As i said earlier in the thread, letting those with no selfcontrol fuck themselves up usually means Bad Things happen to people in their enviroment.
This is where we get back to dawinism , let the stupid ***** that cant read a label kill themselves, its not a great loss to the world if some parasite decides to drink himself to death, sounds harsh but thats nature i am afraid. Why should i have to pay an inflated price for something just because other people are morons?
Anyway, i guess this is why democracy pretty much fails;
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote! - Benjamin Franklin