That's it for the year its a 3 episode season.
The fact he had Watson watch HIM jump and the fact that what we saw falling was HIM and not a random stiff is what needs explaining.
You don't show a gun in the first act, make reference to it and NOT use it by the third act.
tbh I don't think they should have shown him at the last. something much more subtle would have been nicer imo.
Moriath said:Only change i know that got away with it is seven samari and star wars but thats cause no one has seen seven samari before they saw starwars
You don't show a gun in the first act, make reference to it and NOT use it by the third act.
By gun, I of course mean the hanging dummy in their flat in baker street. Also, pay heed to the fact Holmes didn't want Watson to come too close to the hospital. Did we have confirmation that the building Moriarty and Holmes had their standoff was in fact the same building (or same side of same) that Watson looked up to the roof of...? The crowd around the body were in on it, the paramedics who switched out Holmes and the dummy were in on it, and the cyclist was a deliberate ploy.
Fuck Chekov. Fuck him.
oops knew it was based on something hehe bad me getting my films mixed up heheThe Magnificent Seven is based on the Seven Samurai.
Lots of people at work keep asking "How did Sherlock Holmes not die?"
I always reply "Elementary. He's a fictional character. You fucking boring, gay, Dr Who watching, speccy, retarded virgin".
(from sickipedia)
Since the episode's title refers to the Reichenbach Falls and the stories at least broadly follow the books, and kept referring to the "final problem" all the way through the story, its fairly obvious he's not dead, so why not show him? Its not exactly a spoiler...
I had this argument on The Reg a few days ago :/Speak for yourself. And how is Star Wars based on the Seven Samurai anyway? I think you mean The Hidden Fortress (and the cantina scene riffs on Yojimbo)
I had this argument on mumsnet a few days ago :/