I will be glad if he leaves as without him last year i think we could have won the leagueand i do not see the yanks turning down any offer over 100mil
No thanks.
For starters the 3 players would not improve the team.
Ronaldo will go when SAF retires in 3 or 4 years time.
What??
Ramos is perhaps the most sought after defender in europe. If he was available tomorrow, every club in europe would be extremely interested and would be a perfect replacement for Ferdinand. Diarra has undoubted talent and is a much better player than both Carrick and Hargreaves although he has struggled at times at madrid, but no more so than Hargreaves struggled at times at Bayern Munich. As for Robinho, well, read my summary on the other thread.
Fair enough, you would rather keep Ronaldo but to say those 3 players would not improve uniteds team shows an ignorance for the spanish game.
Its all paper talk anyway, because there is no way Real Madrid would let those 3 players leave in order to sign Ronaldo, who isnt even the best player in the world. £150m?? If they offered Barca £100m for the best player in the world, Messi, Barca would snap their hands off.
lol how can you say Rio is better than Ramos
Using England as an example of how good someone is, is not really smart all things considered?
England are crap, so what's your point?
You ask all the top pundits out there, Rio has been one of the best defenders in Europe this season.
They dont even play in the same position. Sergio Ramos is a right-back.
he was saying one is better than the other
Imo he is wrong
Chelsea would have won the league if players didn't go to AN imo.
Nothing to do with the yanks tbh, if SAF wants to sell they will sell.
People seem to think they know the inside out of the finances at Utd.
Not saying i know the In's and Outs but if the guy who owns your club decides to take that £100mil and stick it in his pocket fans and Furguson will have fuck all say.
United got close to £100m in Champions league TV money and Prize money. Would they have won it without Ronaldo? WHo knows, but the double Glazers arent daft and will not sell him for £100m in case it seriously dents their champions league defense next season.
Ok.
Tevez is better than Terry.
he's not going to replace Rio, so I dont get what the discussion is about.
So you would turn down £100 mil for him when he could have a shit season or could break his leg? Potential £100mil vs £100mil cash? I just think £100mil is too much to turn your nose up at.
I'm glad Arsenal didnt get him now actually with all this Spannish talk of him leaving.
!!!!![]()
yeah, because Cesc has never talked about playing in spain![]()
lol how can you say Rio is better than Ramos
Using England as an example of how good someone is, is not really smart all things considered?
yeah, because Cesc has never talked about playing in spain![]()
Yeah because having 3 out of 4 teams in the semi finals of the champions league just shows how rubbish the prem is!
Sorry they may well be decent in Europe but that doesnt always mean they would do well in the prem. Leave the mass buying of "Carlos Kickabouts" to chelsea.
UTD have the best defence in Europe. Why on earth would they want to fiddle with that and then have to find a replacement for Ronaldo?
Its not as if they need the moeny anyway.
Actually United are some £700 million in debt.