remi
Fledgling Freddie
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2004
- Messages
- 1,427
Ginius said:I fully agree.
"some mids" entered that zone too.
200+ mids, even excalibur server crashes at those points.
Ginius said:I fully agree.
"some mids" entered that zone too.
remi said:server crashed 2 times out of you 4 tries? "ok", not worth going back imo! :worthy:
Beeper said:Perhaps one of our new GOA GMs could answer that question.
Beeper said:Actually it crashed three out of three times, and it also crashed both times Albs went to play at fensalir....you can't expect people to want to keep going to any Mid zone knowing that as soon as more than 50 people show up the zone will crash and roll back.
And the point is still being missed. GOA has upgraded the otherr servers and promised to upgrade Pryd in "the coming weeks". It hasn't happened. Why not?
The reason for the upgrade was the instability of Mid zones which was making it impossible for Mids to play TOA properly after they had paid for it.
The instability still exists so where's the new hardware?
Perhaps one of our new GOA GMs could answer that question.
Daedalus said:I suppose that Alb should do at least two relics raids, if the server crashes again I suppose that it would only be fair to reset the relics and lock down the relic keeps until the situation is fixed. When it is, the relics should be given back again. (in this case, all 3 power relics to the hibs and all 3 strength relics to the mids).
Daedalus said:I suppose that Alb should do at least two relics raids, if the server crashes again I suppose that it would only be fair to reset the relics and lock down the relic keeps until the situation is fixed. When it is, the relics should be given back again. (in this case, all 3 power relics to the hibs and all 3 strength relics to the mids).
Brolundar said:my last 5 trials in Uppland
- 78 attackers ganked by 150 defenders, 0 fps until dead
- 80 attackers, crash after door 2 went down
- 75 attackers, crash after door 3 nearly down
- about 60 attackers ganked by >130 defenders, 0 fps until dead againagain
- about 65 attackers this time, connection terminated by server as i tried to enter uppland
sorry, no need for another trial
Nxs said:And all this happened since 1.68 - wow, never noticed any RR's planned since the patch day. The point made previously is that the zone needs testing again as the servers have been upgraded to a new version, this may (or may not) have resolved some of these problems - Im all for doing some more RR's, just give the word.
Daedalus said:So, I propose this.. we'll plan two relic raids, the dates are only known to Albion and GoA (though, undoubtly they'll leak out). We'll request from GoA that they'll monitor the servers at that time and if they crash on both raids, that the relics are to be reset until the problem has been fixed.
Requiel said:New hardware is lined up for Prydwen however I couldn't say what the timescale is. I simply don't know and any kind of estimate given by me would be a pure guess. Again info on this will be posted on the news site as soon as a date is confirmed.
Requiel said:Ok I'm not a server or a network tech so I don't know the specifics behind all of this, however I have spoken to the technical guys to find out what is going on. The lag in the Midgard ToA zones and the instability in the frontiers is not due to the hardware being sub par. Certainly the servers have been able to handle RR sized forces in the past and nothing has changed (from a hardware point of view) in the meantime.
carrot said:whats bs
their is a problem with the mid fronteer zones albs have had 2 good attempts stoped dead because the zone crashed I know I was running to defend on both occations.
perhaps you think there is a problem with the hib zones OK if so say so but its the first Ive herd about it .
and i may point out that on several occations the albs hit the RK without warning and if thay did that to the Hib keep there wouldent be qazillions of mushrooms their.