Totally agree.not everything is black and white.
And by not having kids, youre doing that to your family treeTotally agree.
I'd put it this way: it's the responsibility of mankind to stop destroying ecosystems. We should be crimimally responsible for that.
In the pragmatic case that animals need rehoming temporarily before rehabilitation/reintroduction into the wild then, on the conservation basis alone, that is not ideal but acceptable. << only case for zoos
(As an aside, lots of zoos, however, say that's what they're for, but don't actually contribute that way in anything other than lip service).
And to @Wij's point - if it's the *only* way these animals can survive - i.e. there are zero homes left in the wild to reintroduce/free them then we've failed and we should put the last remaining few down rather than keep them in captivity as slaves for our entertainment.
Then we should put ourselves down for utterly failing to be responsible guardians of the natural world.
People can upload/post whatever size/type of picture they want, I set the server limits.
When did you become such a butthurt reactionary emo?No because the detail is lost.... when did you become such an arrogant asshat?
Half a gig? It is 99meg or so.When did you become such a butthurt reactionary emo?
What's "arrogant" about questioning a desire post a photo that's best part of half a gig and to keep a forum useable.
I haven't mentioned that it'd be nice if you posted your work in-line so they display properly like all the other pictures.
At the moment you seem to have a scouse-stick in your arse and you read my posts and automatically react like I'm being nasty to you. Chill the eff out Yoni...
Absolutely.People can upload/post whatever size/type of picture they want, I set the server limits.
Yes and I am working with @Yoni to figure out what went wrong when she initially tried to embed it. I tried it in my test area and it worked for me but I maybe overriding group permissions as I am an admin. Needs more testing my end.Absolutely.
But the thread would run better if we could actually see the pictures in-line, no?
I like to look at Yoni's pictures (and everyone's posts) - and in my opinion, it'd be nice to be able to see them in-line.
I get you're being protective - but her first post was a link to adobe creative cloud saying "too big to upload".Half a gig? It is 99meg or so.
Fuck me, I am trying to figure out why @Yoni had to use an external service instead of being able to embed the image. There are more worrying things happening around you/us than an image in a thread about images.I get you're being protective - but her first post was a link to adobe creative cloud saying "too big to upload".
Yeah, the thread is a bit fucked with argument but the spirit of it is: you log on, you look at the thread, you can see the pictures people have posted, no?
Thanks @Yoni for helping me diagnose the issue. Glad we got it sorted as it was bugging me.
Well you do act like an arse a lot of the time Yoni posts anything so it's no wonder you get that reactionOK. Maybe I wasn't clear enough.
I like @Yoni's pictures. I'd like to see them in-line like all the other photo's in the thread - so we can just open the thread and see the pics. But if it's big, then it won't work - so if you're editing pics anyway, save a small version for in-line viewing and link a big 20TB version if you like?
Best of both worlds is all I'm after - and if you go through the thread you can see that. If @Yoni hadn't auto-reacted to that by calling me an "arrogant asshat" then the rest of this wouldn't have ensued...
Anyway, last reply from me on that as this page is a wall of text.