Xxcalibur
One of Freddy's beloved
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2004
- Messages
- 1,202
civy said:Doing /who and writing down the guild names isnt probably the best way to find good rvr groups
only GA and tdd are playing actually
civy said:Doing /who and writing down the guild names isnt probably the best way to find good rvr groups
Succi said:half of those weren't "good" and I think you missed out an important one
Xxcalibur said:only GA and tdd are playing actually
Sinnica said:pandora? :E
?SYNTAX ERROR
havent heard of them >< enlight me
Jupiter said:definition of good to me would be those who stuck at it even when certain patches didnt suit and still gave as good as they got.... been nearly 1 1/2 to 2 years since NP actively ran on hib/pry would b interesting to see how they would do now... i still wouldnt put them in my top 5 prydwen of all time...
/ponder /duck
civy said:So hib only has 2 good rvr guilds then? Do you think the rest of the hibs are shit?
That was almost funnyXxcalibur said:and about Aod .... i told FG of 8 members not 16

Hmm, not too much over 2 years ago at least, don't remember exact dates tho. I've been playing daoc for a little over 3 years and it took me a year to get merc to 50, uber as they used to be, so I've only been in rvr for ~2 years. I joined Avalanche when nearing rr5, and the rest of the guilds were active around that time aswell, so yes, they were active under 2 years ago.Xxcalibur said:I thinks thats more than 2 year, 2 years ago u were "soloing" at odins , i still remember when i played my bm saying the grp to stop a sec to duel you. ( i still have your private msg)
ps : nice warning on you account
They were active for a few days a number of weeks ago, I believe. Didn't do too badly, but it was basicly their mentality that sucked, or was at least different from most the active groups.Jupiter said:definition of good to me would be those who stuck at it even when certain patches didnt suit and still gave as good as they got.... been nearly 1 1/2 to 2 years since NP actively ran on hib/pry would b interesting to see how they would do now... i still wouldnt put them in my top 5 prydwen of all time...
/ponder /duck
Gahn said:Another history contest? :s
Anyway fact that Alb Pryd is unable/unwilling to field more than 2 fixed groups at a time from some time is pretty accurate imo.
Thadius said:Thats because the shit you call RVR is all in one area and it ends up with 3+ fgs running about, making all the fights bump into each other
Whats wrong with having a portal keep in each of the realms?
Say Blend,Beno,Crim for Albs, Crachon, Berks and Nott for hibs and Bledmeer, Eras and Bolg for Mids
Should split up the zergs quite nicely
(Remember seeing Rigante, Kair's, Evita's, Rising Force, PE and Alaron's groups all running at same time in hadrians wall)
how come sotl, t30 and outcast isnt on that list then?Gahn said:He's around at least from Si tbh
Gahn said:He said they playing (meaning in RvR guilds arena), quite accurate that too tbh, rest of us are just having fun ^^
Edit:altho i saw a certain bard who renewed so ..add Eclipse soon imo
Boggy said:Surely you can't deny the guilds that Xcalibur put forward are strong RvR guilds (don't like calling them good guilds necessailry since RvR is not the only measure of that)?
I think the problem, as Belxavier was saying, is his failure to recognise some outstanding Alb guilds. It's always easier to name the good guilds of your own realm, because you have friends in them and you play with them, but you shouldn't let it blind you to the quality of others.
Jupiter said:definition of good to me would be those who stuck at it even when certain patches didnt suit and still gave as good as they got.... been nearly 1 1/2 to 2 years since NP actively ran on hib/pry would b interesting to see how they would do now... i still wouldnt put them in my top 5 prydwen of all time...
/ponder /duck
Only seen them pve, as far as I can remember.Samaroon EatsCheese said:was ZOO an rvr guild in alb?
i played in ZOO! ;dStraef said:Only seen them pve, as far as I can remember.
Huntingtons said:how come sotl, t30 and outcast isnt on that list then?
/edit
+ alot of others also mentioned if one is to pick guilds from alb as you did in hib...
SkarIronfist said:redb ?
Zedenz said:...
Again Hib bias though as Belo said, as again the times I have played grp rvr with warrior the few hib grps we meet seem to drop with relative ease in comparison to the alb fgs.
...
hardly all the alb guilds. its coz he's stupid, i know dont try to defend himGahn said:He may have lost something in process \o/
pe and maelSucci said:I've played pryd almost continously since beta , and theres only ever been 2 hib guilds who truely "dominated" the 8v8 scene

He said "Hib guilds"?Huntingtons said:pe and mael![]()
yes it seems he did =( +1 for me thenBelomar said:He said "Hib guilds"?
Succi said:I've played pryd almost continously since beta , and theres only ever been 2 hib guilds who truely "dominated" the 8v8 scene