cHodAX
I am a FH squatter
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2004
- Messages
- 19,742
It's porn, wanking images are porn images. No way around it.
And for gods sake, atleast NSFW spoiler tag it
Give it a rest, the image is censored.
It's porn, wanking images are porn images. No way around it.
And for gods sake, atleast NSFW spoiler tag it
I think the reason no one has yelled that they do it too is not because we don't understand the act. Pictures really wont help.
It's educational so it's not porn. You don't look in a biology book and look at an anatomical diagram of a penis or a vagina and go 'Well, that's porn, someone should have NSFW tagged that'.
Give it a rest, the image is censored.
you wont ever need NSFW anyway toht
No you are just being cantankerous now, the thread has offended no one and is well tagged so all you are doing is trolling for a reaction. The mods have read the thread and seen fit to let it exist. So again, give it a rest.
what if you use the pinkey? is it then a pinkey bum wank?
Read from right to left.
Using a pinkey is known as a starfish tickler, that is what Doc told me anyway.
Appropriately covered up, and if you think you need NSFW tag on a thread named 'pokey bum wank' to avoid people inadvertently looking at it and being shocked then your head needs looking at.
You really can't say you're suprised finding something NSFW in a thread called Pokey Bum Wank, TotoIt's porn, wanking images are porn images. No way around it.
And for gods sake, atleast NSFW spoiler tag it
You really can't say you're suprised finding something NSFW in a thread called Pokey Bum Wank, Toto
i didnt notice he was wanking till you pointed it out, thanks!How can you be sure he's wanking under the pink boxes though?