Outcast classes

Q

Qte Eth

Guest
i would never spec ench light coz its just 4 times worse then mana in any case
ench ench and ment ment are same specs as void elds and light enchs
coz
1)no man in clear mind will spec them
2)they are Much worse then available spec for class
3)when u spec in this way u want to prove smth to others not to get best of ur class
only difference - ment ments and ench enchs will agree with fact they are gimped (in most cases) void elds and light enchs will try to disagree

respec has shown its true even tho before respec more void elds told they arent gimps and tryed to tell how uber their spec is (like 1xxx damage once in their life-was main argument so far afair)

sorry if that hurts ur personality but its plain fact with those specs
 
I

inuyasha

Guest
Qte...

What are you trying to say?
For instance....with stun first, i can pwn j00 =)

at level 50, mana is NOT "better" then light against:

Mobs: killing any single target faster
Anything your alone against in rvr with range OR multiple targets...
anything which resist your heat debuffe even once that you have to fight at range...

The mana itself blast is close to USELESS in rvr unless keep defence or zergs and the damage shield is utterly worthless in rvr....Using the pbaoe means you have to be close enough to something to be generally dead in a zerg, meaning you in most cases still have to use the blast off which I PWN J00! Even with the heat resist light > mana at single targets due to much higher light spec and since there already is 3/1 mana enchanter there is no problem finding targets that is already heat resist meaning i give at least 3/2 your damage that is pretty much ownage =).

The damage shield you have is "nice" for hunting, but still i at kill target mobs ALOT faster with light then mana, and for rvr your shield IS worthless.....
In other words, the shield is even more gimped then the area attack speed decrease =)))

Now tell me what you have left :p

We are equally gimped in so matter mate :p

I found my void eldrich rather boring tbh, but not clueless at all. A 50 void eldrich can one hit kill you, now tell me whats gimped with that :p OR insterupt a full raid from inside a fort doing quite some damage.
 
I

inuyasha

Guest
You sorta seem to miss...

Ment ments and ench enches is gimped case they cant do ANYTHING!

Light and void have a good deal to do in rvr and both own at soloing both mobs and man more then mana.

I have soloed my enchanter 1-44, belive me, light OWNZ for solo, and solo is what i want to do! Dont tell me im a "wannabe different gimp"! And at least if you dear do it again, of which i challenge you, PLEZ try to explain WHY!

All chars have a purpose, beeing very good at one thing and medium to another dont mean your better then the ones that are specialiced in the other and medicore at what you have, seriously :p
 
S

squeakyfrog

Guest
Originally posted by Qte Eth
i would never spec ench light coz its just 4 times worse then mana in any case
ench ench and ment ment are same specs as void elds and light enchs
coz
1)no man in clear mind will spec them
2)they are Much worse then available spec for class
3)when u spec in this way u want to prove smth to others not to get best of ur class

There are different lines for different classes to spec, thats the whole fun part to try different things, otherwise they might just decide your character for u, chanter and eld only doing aoe, ranger only can use a bow, druid heals only and bard plays songs, fighter only can use shield and sword etc, surely that would bring out the best of each classes.

This game gives players options to choose how they want to play their characters, imo its ppl who make all these stereotypes how the classes should be even who is uber and who is gimped. I don't need to prove anything to anybody and don't need to brag but just enjoy the character I've chosen.
 
L

Lessurl

Guest
Originally posted by Qte Eth
i would never spec ench light coz its just 4 times worse then mana in any case
ench ench and ment ment are same specs as void elds and light enchs
coz
1)no man in clear mind will spec them
2)they are Much worse then available spec for class
3)when u spec in this way u want to prove smth to others not to get best of ur class
only difference - ment ments and ench enchs will agree with fact they are gimped (in most cases) void elds and light enchs will try to disagree

respec has shown its true even tho before respec more void elds told they arent gimps and tryed to tell how uber their spec is (like 1xxx damage once in their life-was main argument so far afair)

sorry if that hurts ur personality but its plain fact with those specs



Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah..................<gasps for breath>.............................................hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
Ok, you've just proved to me you've never tried a void eld so i'm not gonna listen to any of your arguments on this subject again. Void is an alternative, there are times when void is best, and times when mana is best or times when light is best. Each spec for an eld has their place.

Btw, have you ever even played an eld? Let alone a void one? I don't go around sayin mana chanters are crap cos i've never played one to lvl higher than 1X, same for any other spec i've never tried properly i wont try to make a judgement about it. But maybe you can know how every class in the game works even when you haven't tried them?
 
D

Danya

Guest
Originally posted by Aeiedil
let me rephrase, few spec nurture to 50 for mana regen 5, however ments get mana regen 5 at 40-45ish i think, not sure where, but at any rate they get it before bards do :) because even if bards get it itll only be at level 50 :) that better?
44 mana spec Aeie. Which mana ments get anyway as top ae dot is 46 and top spec dot is 48. :p
Menta mentalist = how to get aggro healing and get one shotted. :p
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom