Offensive Avatars

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ala

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
1,385
The jiggling, popping out of clothes, being rubbed in circles, static..etc breast avatars. I'm fucking sick of seeing these offensive images. Why is it ok to show that and not penis's, testicles, vaginas or animated intercourse? If a woman goes topless down the street she is gonna get arrested or hassled or similar bad repercussion. Women have two body areas that are virtually the same in terms of nakedness. Men have one.

I was asked to change one of my avatars, it was from a movie and showed an actress with an axe in her head. Those special effects were deemed offensive and I changed it.

Ted and Deebs, maybe it's time to move forward in terms of presenting a responsible image on Freddys' House? You don't accept racism or discrimination in other ways and yet this sexist objectification is prolific on FH. Women browse these forums too. If it's not a problem to anyone else then I don't see why I can't have a pair of bobbing testicles for my avatar and I'd find some just to make my point.
 

Catsby

One of Freddy's beloved
Joined
Apr 21, 2004
Messages
249
I'd also like to have some testicles as an avatar. Anyone volutneering to send a photo?

googoo.gif
 

Ala

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
1,385
I expect to see alot of ignorant replies to this thread as Catsby has just demonstrated. Pre congratulations to those who follow suit. All you do is expose yourself as ridiculous neanderthals. Intelligent discussion is welcome ofc but I have little faith it won't be out weighed by the 'funny guys'.
 

Gengi

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 1, 2004
Messages
537
Ala,
probably not my place to answer this, especially as I am going to disagree ;) Breasts, while being an intimate sexual organ, are almost totally demystified in British society. Several of the daily newspapers have a 'page 3' one has 30 odd. We go on holiday to the Mediterranean so we can look at breasts, sunshine also comes into it, and the excuse to get completely bladdered for a fortnight and become famous for shagging someone on the street in Famagusta for the latest 'reality holiday show', but mostly its breasts. Several of our 'tv personalities', have none, but they do have nice tits. We are innately drawn to naked breasts, in all their forms from the cartoon to the latest edition of Readers Wives, yes even 'ugly bint of Rotheram, likes: to get 'em out. Dislikes: keeping 'em in' we will look at hers, we will say disparaging things about them, but still we will look, and deep down, right at the root, we will think 10 pints, from behind, maybe just maybe.
Your point that it is derogatory to women, demeaning and base, casting all women as sex objects is absolutely valid. Unfortunaltely we do not live in an enlightened society, and breasts are nice to look at. Please do have a nice day.

Later
 

ECA

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
9,439
its a human body, something we all have, not pics of an axe murder taking place, maybe Deebs and Ted dont buy the religious crap about the naked body being evil like all christians do. /sigh
 

nath

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
8,009
Given that (I believe) most people don't find boobs offensive, and after all it is Deebs and TTD's site, they can have the rules however they want, the only solution is to turn off avatars if you find some of them too offensive.

Edit - also, in my opinion the down belows are more offensive/risqué/naughty whatever you wanna call it than a pair of tits. I think you're way off saying all womens bits have equal rudeness.
 

Mazling

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Jan 11, 2004
Messages
1,419
I made a thread about avatars showing up even when turned off. Seems now arcade-related icons also show up when you turn avatars off. I feel like a mariah carey album.
 

JBP|

Part of the furniture
Joined
Dec 19, 2003
Messages
1,360
ala i assume you have read the code of conduct for these froums?

if you havnt here's a quick reminder...

Nudity in images.

To be blunt, Tits and Arse (Male and Female) are ok, Pussy and Dick are not as we dont want to get into the "is it a split beaver shot" or "has he got wood" nonsense. We're too old to be having these debates. Dont forget, you also should be respecting peoples copyright with respect to photographs. And no porn! No pictures of people shagging, even soft porn. Just DONT! Oh, and if anyone thinks this means they can post that picture of the bloke with his hands up his own arse, think again. This means YOU too Wij!


therefore if you want an avatar of some bloke showing his "bitch tits" then feel free to do so



btw do you think this smilie is offensive at all? :sex:
 

Wij

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
18,221
Yay - It means me :D

If you find me a picture of hairy man-breasts I'll happily sport that for a while if it makes ppl happier.
 

]SK[

One of Freddy's beloved
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
302
I kinda agree. Think if your son/daughter was looking at these forums. Its not an offence but its not something younger children should be looking at.
 

throdgrain

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
7,197
God Im really sorry, on a personal note I have no problem with, well, anything to be honest, however on a wider scale i think I agree with SK.
Sorry again :(
 

Lazarus

Part of the furniture
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
2,874
if it offends, turn off the option of viewing avatars.
 

Trem

Not as old as he claims to be!
Moderator
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,293
Ahhhh feels like the good old days of BW :(
 

Frizz

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
1,681
Tremor offends me. :(

edit:// Now i'm actually wondering, why exactly are tits offensive? I see it like this: If a child grows up with them, then they're going to feel more comfortable about them later in life.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
36,074
I was sorta going to agree with Ala because the cartoon norks would still get many people into trouble at work - and I used to do an awful lot of forum browsing from t'office.

Unfortunately - Ala's post was so stroppy I'm totally with the showing of as many norks as possible here - so post away chaps :cool:


Also - life has taught me that when women find pictures of women's breasts offensive it's usually down to the fact that they're under-confident about themselves and see them as a threat of some sort. Fuck em - mingers! ;)
 

Will

/bin/su
Joined
Dec 17, 2003
Messages
5,259
I've turned off avatars. Not that I mind looking at them (though try explaining to your other half that this isn't a forum for men only...), just that my work minds me looking at them. If it was up to me, I'd not allow them as avatars. Then again, it isn't up to me.
 

FuzzyLogic

Kicking squealing Gucci little piggy
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
1,437
I've had strange looks at work with all the breastular avatars winging about (only bloke on a team of 6). But i've left them on and just don't look at fh as often while i'm there.


bah :|
 

Damini

Part of the furniture
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
2,234
Sir Frizz said:
edit:// Now i'm actually wondering, why exactly are tits offensive? I see it like this: If a child grows up with them, then they're going to feel more comfortable about them later in life.

If a child grows up with tits, it needs to go on a diet, or stop stealing mum's contraceptive pills. THEY AREN'T SWEETIES!!

Tehe...

:(

Sorry.

To be serious, I've never really been offended by a pair of breasts, but I can see the point of view of how I wouldn't want young kids or my boss seeing bobbing breasts on my screen, but Ala you stormed in here with your bra on fire, your knickers in a twist, and acted like it was an attempt to end suffrage rather than jiggling titties and that's bound to get people off side. The only avatar that wasn't sex related that was ever removed on Barrysworld as far as I remember was something that looked really snuff like and involved a woman being given a Chelsea grin, but I can't remember whose that was.
 

old.Tohtori

FH is my second home
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
45,210
Is my fluffy seal offensive? It's no beaver but...

I see Ala's point and in that sense, i agree too. But in a sense i understand the point of "tits ok, weewee not".

How could i explain it. Hmm. Well. I don't really know what this "obsession"(with a lack of better term), for boobies is. Maybe it's a childhood "give me boobiemilk" thing, maybe it's a wonder because men don't have them(as big atleast...except Fabio).

But, not here to discuss that. I agree with Ala because i find puppies as "sex oriented" as free willies or hairy mongroes. But i do realise that in other peoples minds / cultures it's not the case. I don't agree with Ala with the point that they should be removed because there are no happy johnsons or miss lucies around.

Nope that clears it.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
36,074
old.Tohtori said:
....i find puppies as "sex oriented" as free willies or hairy mongroes....


Even though they're blatantly not?

Lets face it - tits are so commonplace nowadays that they only just raise an eyebrow (if that). You can't tell me that norkage is even in the same league as picture of a blokes cock or a nice beaver-shot.
 

SAS

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
1,004
Having just completed a diversity course, you need to look away from "oh this is always around and not offensive?" The sun has page 3, and you do see a lot of breastage on tv but does it make it right? If someone finds something offensive then surely should not have to look at it (then turn avatars off in this case)

You could argue if FH want to expand the globe then breastage would turn away female gamers (although Damini and other female users happily use the site) and younger gamers, but FreddysHouse has it's own style of wit and humour so if people can't accept breasts in avatars then they will probably be offended by FH in some other way?

My girlfriend has recently been introduced to FH and the world of online gaming and she does not like seeing breasts, but it's not stopped her using the site and she is now addicted :).
 

old.Tohtori

FH is my second home
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
45,210
Scouse said:
Even though they're blatantly not?

Lets face it - tits are so commonplace nowadays that they only just raise an eyebrow (if that). You can't tell me that norkage is even in the same league as picture of a blokes cock or a nice beaver-shot.

That's why i said "But i do realise that in other peoples minds / cultures it's not the case. "

I'd LOVE to see a pair of joyballoons instead of a "private ryan", but that's just 'cause i'm a guy and not misspelled at that.
 

Wazzerphuk

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
12,054
Personally, I have nothing against it, nor am I in the least bit offended by it either.

I have personally complained about this issue before, in particular regards to Big G's animated revealing of tits. Now, I, like a lot of other people browse at work. I read the forums with a quick glance of avatar to establish who the user is posting. I have to scroll quickly past. Now, I think the main problem lies within the fact the image is moving, and constantly repeating.

What it largely comes down to is that currently users are being told to turn avatars off if they have a complaint about them. As far as I have seen, there is only one person with what could be deemed even slightly inappropriate avatar. This person is causing people to remove features of the boards they like and utilise because one person thinks it is a great idea to have a tacky cheap pair of tits on their screen. Like I said before, I have no personal problem with this: I just think it stinks of immaturity and lowers the tone of the place. Normally if there is a low tone, it is hinted at in the thread. If you happen to be talking about a serious matter, the LAST thing you want on your screen is a pair of wobbling tits.

If I wanted users with stupid wobbling titty avatars, I'd go to some lame anime boards. Or some boards with 11 year old members. This place is above stupid titties for avatars. Stupid titties in threads are fine, because you know they are there.

My idea? Stop titties etc in avatars, keep them allowed on the boards but have some kind of tag at the start/somewhere in the thread subject stating that there may be the inappropriate material. This way, if someone doesn't want to see bouncing titties, they can control it without cutting out everyone's normal, mature minded avatars.

My 2 pence, not that it matters.
 

Xtro

One of Freddy's beloved
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
894
There's enough tits on here besides the avatars.


(ba dum tish)
 

yaruar

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
2,617
JBP| said:
ala i assume you have read the code of conduct for these froums?

therefore if you want an avatar of some bloke showing his "bitch tits" then feel free to do so

Hmm, i think maybe it's time to get my man breasts icon I have for special occasions......
 

yaruar

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
2,617
yaruar said:
Hmm, i think maybe it's time to get my man breasts icon I have for special occasions......

wee, found it!

47555


And even bigger, just for the ladies

manboobies2.jpg
 

Bym

One of Freddy's beloved
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
144
I don't really find breasts offensive myself. I have a pair. Oh, and if they were akin to a vagina, penis, etc, no way would I breastfeed in public, which is becoming pretty socially acceptable nowadays.

When I was at uni, a student had her tits out for an entire day and wasn't arrested.

I think titties, real or fake, are much prettier and less offensive than a huge pair of hairy, saggy bollocks, and I'm female and straight. Just a personal opinion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom