- Joined
- Dec 14, 2003
- Messages
- 3,410
Addlcove said:jupe your avatar... is it two lions?
or a monkey giving itself a blowjob?
Two lions having a shag
Addlcove said:jupe your avatar... is it two lions?
or a monkey giving itself a blowjob?
He knows the community very well.Revz said:I haven't seen any sensible reasons to support the conclusion that "Sharma is the best choice" but I've seen plenty about why he isn't. Please enlighten me.
Revz said:I haven't seen any sensible reasons to support the conclusion that "Sharma is the best choice" but I've seen plenty about why he isn't. Please enlighten me.
He knows the community very well.
He knows how the forums work, which sub-forums to be wary of <grins>
He is an experienced DAoC player.
I don't feel it would be appropriate to go into more detail on any individuals, but Sharma was a clear choice. I'll leave it at that.
Revz said:Tu quoque, appeal to pity, appeal to popularity. The only relevant reason is his moderation of the FFXI boards and I would hesitate to say whether that or his participation in the server downtime/password changes/hacking/exploiting are more relevant to the DAoC community.
Deadmanwalking said:I never got told to apply
I would have whipped this place into shape in no time.
Revz said:Well I can't challenge an argument on the basis of reasons I'm not aware of so I'll have to leave it at this. You could have just said "trust us" at the beginning instead of letting the other mods embarrass themselves by making up their own frail arguments.
Ayana said:Sharma didn't participate in any events that lead to any of those incidents. I mean ffs, get it into your thick skulls already.
All Sharma ever did was fly around in Emain and pop some epic mobs.
Iskander said:oh, so someone who clearly participated in hacking / abusing the server, resulting in servers that went off-line for several days, and causing alot of annoyance in the DAOC comunity is the best suited person as a moderator?
Jupitus said:In this instance, yes, in our view. Please read the thread before posting folks... it's getting a bit tiresome continually repeating myself.
Revz said:There is no information in this thread for people to digest however, it boils down to "our view" and nothing else so unless you give some reasons there is nothing for people to miss.
Iskander said:And you didn't see a problem with this? A moderator should be someone who we can respect, not a joker who caused problems for all of us.
We already had problems with a mod who tried to scam people (in game), and now you add another guy who got no problem breaking a few laws. What the hell are you guys smoking?
Iskander said:I think we live in a strange world. The bigger an ass you are, the more chance you have to make it in this world, proven yet again.
Its not going round in circles, these people are annoyed and you're not actually giving any reason as to why they shouldnt be annoyed.Jupitus said:This is going round and round in circles. Read my response to Revz to understand the selection process. Thanks.
BlitheringIdiot said:Why is sharma's name in the mods list in bold btw?
Tareregion said:I do think that the way applications are handled is wrong then, if I understand it right. You selected him because he was good at moderating. But u also should look at how the community thinks of him.
Jupitus said:We discussed the applications including possible concerns over Sharma's past, and still decided that we felt he'd do a good job. What more information can we give you to digest? We have made it clear that we have taken into account possible concerns in our discussions, and your earlier suggestion that we were 'suprised' that some people have their concerns is totally wrong.