It's seems having spent the latter years franticly hunting down anything remotly resembeling filesharing sites, be they legal or illegal. they've now come up with a new tactic, basicly instead of persecuting the perpetrator "site or server ect" they're now aiming at the Isp's to block traffic to the sites they "the antipiracy unions" view as illegal filesharing sites.
Here in Denmark the IFPI & FDV have won a case over the isp DMT2 and forced them to cut traffic to thepiratebay.org/. and Tele2 have since also desided to fall into line with the verdict until it's been tested in a new court.
I really dont know what to think of it, your thoughts ?
arent they basicly percecuting one part for another part's activities ? be it legal or illegal ?
yet we naturally, freely, accept, even demand this practice when it comes to things like child pornografy and the likes...But then again ofc in such a case it's a clear illegal activity, wich isnt always the case with file sharing, so is the mear possibility & likelihood enough to justify such legal action towards an ISP ?
to me it's a slippery slope indeed...
Here in Denmark the IFPI & FDV have won a case over the isp DMT2 and forced them to cut traffic to thepiratebay.org/. and Tele2 have since also desided to fall into line with the verdict until it's been tested in a new court.
I really dont know what to think of it, your thoughts ?
arent they basicly percecuting one part for another part's activities ? be it legal or illegal ?
yet we naturally, freely, accept, even demand this practice when it comes to things like child pornografy and the likes...But then again ofc in such a case it's a clear illegal activity, wich isnt always the case with file sharing, so is the mear possibility & likelihood enough to justify such legal action towards an ISP ?
to me it's a slippery slope indeed...