Looks like infs got the overpowerd ml alone!

[loxleyhood]

Re: Re: Re: Looks like infs got the overpowerd ml alone!

Originally posted by nightsorrow
\\

Sad lozer!

You got pwnd

Explain how?

 

[nightsorrow]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Looks like infs got the overpowerd ml alone!

Originally posted by loxleyhood
Explain how?

Cause you said if you can prove the last style is more overpowerd then the first you win a price!

Well the last style is the most overpowerd almost so pwnd noob

/cry more

 

[loxleyhood]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Looks like infs got the overpowerd ml alone!

Originally posted by nightsorrow
Cause you said if you can prove the last style is more overpowerd then the first you win a price!

Well the last style is the most overpowerd almost so pwnd noob

/cry more

God.

Read my post, you'll find I said I would offer a prize to the first person who could explain why the 9th Battlemaster ML would be better than the 1st Stormcaller/Spymaster/Banelord MLs.

The answer of course is 9 > 1, and it was a stupid comparison.

 

[censi]

calm down people jeeeeesus

 

[loxleyhood]

Notice also that these MLs follow the descriptive abilities of the realms. Midgard = offence. Albion = defence. Hibernia = Magic.

 

[talivarevil]

btw no1 has got ml2 yet and the list ppl keep refering to wasnt the correct 1 so pls all just wait ok?

 

[mandom]

omg NS gonna be the gimmmmmpssssssssss!!!

 

[Haldar]

You're a dumbass. You compare one of the highest Battlemaster abilities to the lowest Stormcaller and Spymaster ones. Great comparisons Sherlock, never would have imagined that the high Battlemaster ability would be better than the low Stormcaller/Spymaster ones.

Lox, what r u talking about? Sapping Strike, the style which is talked about is #1 ability in Battlemaster path. Where did u dig up #9?

And you realise that actually landing 2 of them on a target is not a given, right? Try that on a target with 50% defense rate and you're likely to be left with 0 end while your target has 50%.

But we all have end regen/pots/bp crystals, etc, etc. So errr. big deal?

Assasin is a target with 25% defence rate - when he faces another assasin.

As for pots....they are all on timer. And it turns out that they are becoming as something which is necessary, not as something optional.

yesterday i was killed by NS. Why? bcoz i was just after a fight, and had 30% end and full hp, and i couldnt drink a end heal/regen pots bcoz i used AF charge 2 mins before - and after it no pots/charges are consumable for 3 mins.

Again Albion gets somethig for free - while other realms must struggle to reach....

 

[belth]

Banelord ML1 is good, a direct nerf to all those chanters who only know the PBAoE, QC and MoC buttons: http://vnboards.ign.com/message.asp?topic=58874819&replies=3

 

[Haldar]

Originally posted by belth
Banelord ML1 is good, a direct nerf to all those chanters who only know the PBAoE, QC and MoC buttons: http://vnboards.ign.com/message.asp?topic=58874819&replies=3

it wont help SBs.

 

[loxleyhood]

Originally posted by Haldar
Lox, what r u talking about? Sapping Strike, the style which is talked about is #1 ability in Battlemaster path. Where did u dig up #9?

Im talking about where he gets to the end of his post and gets to his point which is 'nerf bodyguard, nerf infis.'

Originally posted by Ximadir
GO FOTM 2 button noobs and yes bodyguard is in that line 2 hahaha

 

[belth]

Originally posted by Haldar
it wont help SBs.

True, but it's a good ML anyway... IMO infs shouldn't get Battlemaster either, doesn't fit the class. Unless you die when someone "hits" your Bodyguardee hard enough.

 

[Ximadir]

Latest Patch:

- We fixed a bug that allowed Shadowblades who reached Master Level One to pick the Banelord ability track. This has been fixed, and is now correctly set to be a choice of either Spymaster or Battlemaster. Anyone who chose Banelord as their track is now set to Battlemaster. Anyone who would rather be a Spymaster can enter an emergency /Appeal in-game, and CS will change this for you. This is a one time opportunity for change, and is only available to Shadowblades who originally chose Banelord as their ability track.

lol

 

[envenom]

Originally posted by Sharp Thing
learn to spell names tbh

i meant to spell it like that you idiot ;/ the real name has already been taken funnily enough

 

[belth]

Originally posted by Ximadir
Latest Patch:

- We fixed a bug that allowed Shadowblades who reached Master Level One to pick the Banelord ability track. This has been fixed, and is now correctly set to be a choice of either Spymaster or Battlemaster. Anyone who chose Banelord as their track is now set to Battlemaster. Anyone who would rather be a Spymaster can enter an emergency /Appeal in-game, and CS will change this for you. This is a one time opportunity for change, and is only available to Shadowblades who originally chose Banelord as their ability track.

lol

Ah well, now you can't whine about it.

 

[loxleyhood]

Originally posted by belth
Ah well, now you can't whine about it.

You watch the NS.

 

[belth]

Originally posted by loxleyhood
You watch the NS.

Well they whine anyway... They don't even want any improvements for their own class judging by the Celt/Shar hassle.

 

[Haldar]

good that they fixed it.

as for celt-shars....rection is predictable

1. it is a direct nerf to current NSs - as new ones would be more powerful while losing nothing.
2. as a follow-up it would lead to possible all-NS nerf - such as removal of AP.

 

[Aybabtu]

Originally posted by Haldar
good that they fixed it.

as for celt-shars....rection is predictable

1. it is a direct nerf to current NSs - as new ones would be more powerful while losing nothing.
2. as a follow-up it would lead to possible all-NS nerf - such as removal of AP.

As for the nerf you might be right but you sure Celt/Shars gets same dex/quick as Luwis and Elph's?

 

[Haldar]

not ofc.

but as a norse with 50 base qui and zero qui at startup i achieved hard cap 250 qui, and shars got same 50 qui and celts have 60

if NSs goes blades - higher str (60) of shar/celt would really help ofc.

as for dex - celt has +20 str and -20 dex compared to luri, pierce WS stays same. For shars it would drop a bit - +20 str and -30 dex, but it is compensated by +40 con.

 

[Aybabtu]

I cee

Didn't know the stats on Shars tbh

 

[belth]

Originally posted by Haldar
as for celt-shars....rection is predictable

1. it is a direct nerf to current NSs - as new ones would be more powerful while losing nothing.
2. as a follow-up it would lead to possible all-NS nerf - such as removal of AP.

1. Agree
2. Agree

Funniest thing is still the "intensity" of the whines.

Mythic really has to resolve the Quickness issue, my merc has 221 (I think that's the number) Qui fully buffed without any Aug Qui - add 2 of it for Dodger and it's very close to haste-modifier cap.

 

[Powahhh]

Re: Re: Looks like infs got the overpowerd ml alone!

Originally posted by Pin
And you realise that actually landing 2 of them on a target is not a given, right? Try that on a target with 50% defense rate and you're likely to be left with 0 end while your target has 50%.

But we all have end regen/pots/bp crystals, etc, etc. So errr. big deal?

as pin says
where in fuck is the deal of you getting endu drain ?
if you do not give away your precious (lol) bounty points to buy insta endu heals and give some money to buy some endu regen pots all these are just a pile of crap imo
i got myself 1 endu regen charbot and always carry maximum endu stones just in case i need endu fast and not regen.....
but anyway some1 else is here the 2 button noob

 

[knoll]

problem is that pots and totems are on a timer u see.

and a stupid focking timer as well i use AF charge's alot and after i used a AF charge i cant use anything else for 2 or 3 min.

yey

 

[Arkian]

think it was already established in the above patch note:
http://www.camelotherald.com/more/1159.shtml

That Infiltrators aren't the only stealther with access to the battlemaster ability.

Also further up in this thread, it was proposed that spymaster is for true stealthers, agree

 

[old.Emma]

Originally posted by Arkian
think it was already established in the above patch note:
http://www.camelotherald.com/more/1159.shtml

That Infiltrators aren't the only stealther with access to the battlemaster ability.

Also further up in this thread, it was proposed that spymaster is for true stealthers, agree

Both SB and Infil gets Battlemaster. The only major difference is the style will cost more end for SB`s to use. It has been tested that with for instance a Polearm of 5.x spd the style used ~50% of your end whilst draining 50% of your targets end. But when tested using a 2.2 Spd Dirk it only used ~15% of your end and still drained 50% of your targets. This is a bug and will be fixed soon. As it should drain a straight 33% of your end regardless of weapon used.

 

[Arkian]

Originally posted by old.Emma
Both SB and Infil gets Battlemaster. The only major difference is the style will cost more end for SB`s to use. It has been tested that with for instance a Polearm of 5.x spd the style used ~50% of your end whilst draining 50% of your targets end. But when tested using a 2.2 Spd Dirk it only used ~15% of your end and still drained 50% of your targets. This is a bug and will be fixed soon. As it should drain a straight 33% of your end regardless of weapon used.

By saying it will cost more end for an SB, then giving weapon speed examples, what are you trying to say?

is it:

a). It costs more end for an SB than an infil when both using same speed weapon?

b). SBs inherently use slower weapons and thus pay more end?