infil vs Savage

killrake · Oct 6, 2003

To all u that say that Savage is a one push button char to play.

After seen wittor_2 movie I must say that Infils are FAR more a onpush button char to play.

If they nerf Savage, then nerf that damn DragonFang to then.

Maybe its skill, maybe not to use DF but it sure looked to easy with DF.

bloodclot · Oct 6, 2003

are savages attacks ( side positionals + followup, backstyle + followups, after evade + followups and after parry +followups) all combined in one button?

nalistah · Oct 6, 2003

It is easy with DragonFang. Havent u noticed all the whine about it? Havent u noticed that it pops new fotm-infils in emain everyday? :m00:

Aussie- · Oct 6, 2003

Only Regent can loose from an infil..

Pin · Oct 6, 2003

Originally posted by killrake
To all u that say that Savage is a one push button char to play.

After seen wittor_2 movie I must say that Infils are FAR more a onpush button char to play.

If they nerf Savage, then nerf that damn DragonFang to then.

Maybe its skill, maybe not to use DF but it sure looked to easy with DF.

Errrr... No-one (well, idiots maybe) says that a Savage is a 1-button class. But what does that have to do with being overpowered?

Anyway, both are piss-easy to play.

killrake · Oct 6, 2003

BTW

Why is it not more Reavers in RvR, I mean I have seen Reavers rock the ass out of the most they meet, Whyp u rule man.

Antedeluvian · Oct 6, 2003

Because we have not cheap tanks RAs having selfbuffs (like savages have) and we havent self end regen (like savages have) and we can't quad whit unstyled hits (like savages can) and we havent the chance of chose tank WS using a 2H (like savages have), and our magic line is crap at high lvls (NOT like savages' one), and our best style is toned dwon whit resistances (NOT like savages' styles), and i can write a ton of disaventages against the overpowered FOTM scum (aka savages)

Xandax · Oct 6, 2003

Originally posted by killrake
BTW

Why is it not more Reavers in RvR, I mean I have seen Reavers rock the ass out of the most they meet, Whyp u rule man.

Why roll that when they can roll fotms infils with DF instead

old.anubis · Oct 6, 2003

Originally posted by Antedeluvian
Because we have not cheap tanks RAs having selfbuffs (like savages have) and we havent self end regen (like savages have) and we can't quad whit unstyled hits (like savages can) and we havent the chance of chose tank WS using a 2H (like savages have), and our magic line is crap at high lvls (NOT like savages' one), and our best style is toned dwon whit resistances (NOT like savages' styles), and i can write a ton of disaventages against the overpowered FOTM scum (aka savages)

QQ more

old.Nol · Oct 6, 2003

Originally posted by killrake
BTW

Why is it not more Reavers in RvR, I mean I have seen Reavers rock the ass out of the most they meet, Whyp u rule man.

Reavers < full duration mezz
Savages > full duration mezz

easy as that...

Rollie · Oct 6, 2003

Originally posted by Xandax
Why roll that when they can roll fotms infils with DF instead

BidAccount · Oct 6, 2003

Originally posted by nalistah
It is easy with DragonFang. Havent u noticed all the whine about it? Havent u noticed that it pops new fotm-infils in emain everyday?

And haven't you noticed that nalistah spends more and more time talking out of his ass each day?

For goodness sakes! Yes everyone has the right to be an asshole, but please take a little time off every now and then!

[DK]hakke · Oct 6, 2003

so much df whine post .62

behatch · Oct 6, 2003

Originally posted by killrake
To all u that say that Savage is a one push button char to play.

After seen wittor_2 movie I must say that Infils are FAR more a onpush button char to play.

If they nerf Savage, then nerf that damn DragonFang to then.

Maybe its skill, maybe not to use DF but it sure looked to easy with DF.

wittors got skill,and the overpowered factor on his side.

nalistah · Oct 6, 2003

Originally posted by donttouchpoopy
And haven't you noticed that nalistah spends more and more time talking out of his ass each day?

For goodness sakes! Yes everyone has the right to be an asshole, but please take a little time off every now and then!

Just read my quote on you in my sig, and we can clearly see who is talking out of his ass.

Jergiot · Oct 6, 2003

infils dont have same impact on rvr as savages u mong.
but yes they need nerf to.

tildson · Oct 6, 2003

savages has no impact regarding the stealth-wars, why compare 2 diffirent things?

[NP]Regent · Oct 6, 2003

Originally posted by Aussie-
Only Regent can loose from an infil..

It was not me playing for the 55345345th time!!

D

oh.. hi there aussie!

old.Lethul · Oct 6, 2003

Originally posted by Antedeluvian
Because we have not cheap tanks RAs having selfbuffs (like savages have) and we havent self end regen (like savages have) and we can't quad whit unstyled hits (like savages can) and we havent the chance of chose tank WS using a 2H (like savages have), and our magic line is crap at high lvls (NOT like savages' one), and our best style is toned dwon whit resistances (NOT like savages' styles), and i can write a ton of disaventages against the overpowered FOTM scum (aka savages)

you know merc/bm/inf/ns/rangers can double hit without style!?

Silenzio · Oct 6, 2003

Originally posted by killrake
To all u that say that Savage is a one push button char to play.

After seen wittor_2 movie I must say that Infils are FAR more a onpush button char to play.

If they nerf Savage, then nerf that damn DragonFang to then.

Maybe its skill, maybe not to use DF but it sure looked to easy with DF.

on the left side ov the movie thers a Qbar

re-watch the wole movie and count how many button (styles abilityes items) have been used...

infil is way harder

Denisée · Oct 6, 2003

Originally posted by [DK]hakke
so much df whine post .62

Allways been df whine, but pre .62 everyone was consern about LA whine to notice most of it. Now savages have taken their place in the same scale, but the df whine did come into light when savages was not considered FoTM.

Think about it!

infernalwrath · Oct 6, 2003

Originally posted by nalistah
Just read my quote on you in my sig, and we can clearly see who is talking out of his ass.

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by nalistah
And slam from a scout - insta stun to imo :O.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

try slamming a sb with 900 ws debuffed so u get a clue

zlair · Oct 6, 2003

that cant be df spamming...

isnt wittor 50 dual/trust ?

my guess its Dualshadow (even tho im not sure - its just that my DF doesnt look like the ones he is using - but then again, he gets it of behinds target, or is that just lag ?)

old.anubis · Oct 7, 2003

Originally posted by [DK]hakke
so much df whine post .62

so much savage whine pre 1.65 ^^

[DK]hakke · Oct 7, 2003

Originally posted by zlair
that cant be df spamming...

isnt wittor 50 dual/trust ?

my guess its Dualshadow (even tho im not sure - its just that my DF doesnt look like the ones he is using - but then again, he gets it of behinds target, or is that just lag ?)

DF and DS does almost the same dmg, but df does it with 50% less end

Originally posted by Denisée
Allways been df whine, but pre .62 everyone was consern about LA whine to notice most of it. Now savages have taken their place in the same scale, but the df whine did come into light when savages was not considered FoTM.

Think about it!

Hm, pre .62 you didn't have to whine cuz you could win even tho you got a 9sec stun on you.

[DK]hakke · Oct 7, 2003

And btw, Infiltrator vs Savage...Even if you get DF in vs a savage they still end up with 80% hp (before selfbuffs drop) If both are buffed.

zlair · Oct 7, 2003

Originally posted by [DK]hakke
DF and DS does almost the same dmg, but df does it with 50% less end

is this true ? wierd...

[DK]hakke · Oct 7, 2003

Originally posted by zlair
is this true ? wierd...

Why is it wierd?

Ekydus · Oct 7, 2003

Infiltrators are meant to be fucking fast hitting, hard hitting mofos.
In other words, if something in chain can hit on par or even more damage than a leather wearer with the same speed, something is VERY wrong.

sigh · Oct 7, 2003

Originally posted by old.Lethul
you know merc/bm/inf/ns/rangers can double hit without style!?

thats a valid point because?
or even sarcastic...not clever

2+2 = 4?
zerks/sb's?

even if any of the above tank class's you mention had the abilties <cough spells> of the savage they would be considered overpowered?

+ only thing that set these apart is pf, and wepskill, but then savage can have wepskill if it wants, or it can get a rear stun through 2h2.

Sure this is a whyne about DF, if people use the arguement mid = tank, realm hib= caster realm, albion is obvisously the rogue realm.

mythic = fooking roleplayers

sort balance out plzkthnx.

infil vs Savage

killrake

Guest

bloodclot

Guest

nalistah

Guest

Aussie-

Guest

Pin

Guest

killrake

Guest

Antedeluvian

Guest

Xandax

Guest

old.anubis

Guest

old.Nol

Guest

Rollie

Guest

BidAccount

Guest

[DK]hakke

Guest

behatch

Guest

nalistah

Guest

Jergiot

Guest

tildson

Guest

[NP]Regent

Guest

old.Lethul

Guest

Silenzio

Guest

Denisée

Guest

infernalwrath

Guest

zlair

Guest

old.anubis

Guest

[DK]hakke

Guest

[DK]hakke

Guest

zlair

Guest

[DK]hakke

Guest

Ekydus

Guest

sigh

Guest

Users who are viewing this thread

Similar threads