I-RvR good? bad?

Do you think I-RvR is a good thing?

  • Yes, i think its great for casual players who dont want to travle far and also get's lower RR's out

    Votes: 134 45.0%
  • NO, i can't stand it its a zergfest an takes away from the point of RvR of invading other realms.

    Votes: 113 37.9%
  • Care!

    Votes: 51 17.1%

  • Total voters
    298
Status
Not open for further replies.

Manisch Depressiv

Part of the furniture
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
7,727
Puppet said:
Anyhow asked for a duel earlier with your arms but u turned it down, afraid your heavy-tank would loose against an assassin?

I am not arranging duels. I'll duel you when the opportunity arises, but this is hard, as you only unstealth while someone is on me.

If you think you can beat a RR3L6 ML10 Warlord with solo RAs/artifacts (and I'd need to respec) with your NS then you need a reality check. Ranger in melee will do it, but that's it.
 

Manisch Depressiv

Part of the furniture
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
7,727
Conjurus said:
Since when have you been looking for a fg-fg fight?

Flame baiting Legacy assholes again. I think it's time to make a movie how you "pwn" some ML10 raid again.
 

Quinlan

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
590
Manisch Depressiv said:

I hope you never quit. Tis funny to read your drivelling on this forum.

That way prikspruitje can zerg all he want ;)
 

xxManiacxx

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Jan 25, 2004
Messages
3,042
Manisch Depressiv said:
I am not arranging duels. I'll duel you when the opportunity arises, but this is hard, as you only unstealth while someone is on me.

If you think you can beat a RR3L6 ML10 Warlord with solo RAs/artifacts (and I'd need to respec) with your NS then you need a reality check. Ranger in melee will do it, but that's it.


All that is needed is viper3 lifebane and dotmine. Hardly needs to hit you
 
Joined
Jun 21, 2004
Messages
3,185
GReaper said:
For the 40% who voted no, theres nobody forcing you to iRvR, just go to another frontier instead.

Nobody forces you to teleport to the 3 main keeps used for insta-RvR. If you really want to go and take a keep - do it!

shame it aint really that simple. :( i dont really wanna go try taking a keep solo (which i am 99% of the time) and you try and go anywhere else for rvr and its dead ;\
 

SkarIronfist

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
1,200
I like the idea of have a keep in hib/alb. Though I would like to go around midgard abit more, its all that green it does my nut in.
 

Sentimos

Banned
Joined
May 27, 2005
Messages
201
IRvR is nice for set groups or decent fgs that’s it. Its a fucking pile of shite for anyone else specially when I when you have berk or bolg and have to run up on a non speed class and get jumped by a fg or just a mini alb zerg then its /q. But If I got a chance to run in a FG it would be ideal so it works both ways.
 

Zebolt

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
3,247
Even when I solo I think IRvR is waaaaaay better. The time you lose on looking for enemies and traveling are just boring and I don't understand all those ppl here who think waiting are fun but it's up to them.

Action > all
 
Joined
Jun 21, 2004
Messages
3,185
Zebolt said:
Even when I solo I think IRvR is waaaaaay better. The time you lose on looking for enemies and traveling are just boring and I don't understand all those ppl here who think waiting are fun but it's up to them.

Action > all

you spoil rvr for me aswell! :mad:
 

Zebolt

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
3,247
Samaroon EatsCheese said:
you spoil rvr for me aswell! :mad:
It's better to be hated for who you are, than to be loved for who you are not. :>
 

Chamie

Loyal Freddie
Joined
May 4, 2004
Messages
276
Who wants to take a fucking boat anyway?
Well tbh if irvr is good or bad depends on zone, hib insta rvr sux azz u got lagging woods, keeps everywhere and like one little point of the map there u can fight :E.
Insta RvR in hw fucking rox though dunno why albs toke back the keeps.
 

Haggus

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Jun 18, 2004
Messages
1,075
Fuck any Irvr tbh, take all your keeps back and lets RvR like we used too.

Bring back OF
 

Xxcalibur

One of Freddy's beloved
Joined
Jan 26, 2004
Messages
1,202
i support zebolt

action > all


btw YES i like iRVR win atm 50 % , NO only 37 %
 

Sharkith

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Mar 11, 2005
Messages
2,798
Zebolt said:
It's better to be hated for who you are, than to be loved for who you are not. :>

"ahh so master... when I leave here...."
 

Zedenz

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Aug 25, 2004
Messages
1,134
I agree action is nice, but not the type of action where I get the entire population of Albion nuking/shooting me as soon as I pop making it impossible to have a fight.

I've said it once and I'll say it again, the area is just simply too small to support the type of rvr you guys are promoting for extended periods.
 

Straef

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Feb 21, 2004
Messages
5,890
Conjurus said:
Since when have you been looking for a fg-fg fight?
Nice one coming from the allmighty **** again xD
Keep up the 'You're not allowed to zerg, but we are' atitude.
 

Corran

Part of the furniture
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
6,180
Depends.... sometimes it shit and sometimes it good.. depends on what you want.

At the moment it not bad for me.. 50k rp in a few hours that were spread over a couple nights on a lvl 47 non sc'd toon aint bad way to spend time as it means I have some needed ra's when i start to run in groups for fg fights..

but then I only enjoy it as bored with merc, sorc is easy mode solo (bored running in melee groups with him), and tic is underappreciated group toon. And i cant complete my current toon till i get AT which probably wont be till the end of the week, and so i not leveling to 50 just to go back to poc once i get at :p
 

MKJ

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jun 5, 2004
Messages
1,196
IRVR? Wot the hell is that? 'Intense RVR' or summit? By the way anyone seen Aoln's mum?
 

Megarevs

Loyal Freddie
Joined
Apr 22, 2004
Messages
875
MKJ said:
IRVR? Wot the hell is that? 'Intense RVR' or summit? By the way anyone seen Aoln's mum?
Instant RvR m8, when all 3 realms can port to a single zone. Most of the time its a zerg fest.
 

TheBinarySurfer

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
2,041
shorti said:
rofl pip saying that he is getting zerged ;o that must be the best joke i've heard this year :D
Though i guess every decent duo is better than his stealth fg or his warkcock grps and he thinks that ppl zerg him ..
Hahah pip ill dig up the screenie of me waving to your 4 warlocks on /assist group around crim earlier - if you do that do you really expect people to feed them piecemeal into the grinder that is a warlock assist train? :)
 

fettoken

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
9,640
MKJ said:
IRVR? Wot the hell is that? 'Intense RVR' or summit? By the way anyone seen Aoln's mum?

Btw. Do you ever play "real rvr" in the frontier, or do you play your beloved thid 24/7 ?
 

Gahn

Resident Freddy
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
5,056
Is iRvR good for having fast action? Yes
Do iRvR incourage (sp?) zerg parties? Yes
Do iRvR puts balance even more in favour of fixed groups despite other players? Yes
Do iRvR leaves space for small groups/soloers? No

Now i can understand that for some lazy bastard getting a boat and having a ciggie between a run and another is too much, but tbh situations like yesterday night with 60+ Hibs in Emain, surely at least double Mids (moving mainly as a zerg, apart 2-3 fgs) and (i'd say) 30-50 Albs (hugging that fucking tower near bridge over and over), is stupid, imo. Been a good run till 21.30 uk, after that never been able to have a clean fight apart 1 underwater fight near Bolg Coastline :eek6:
 

Vermillon

One of Freddy's beloved
Joined
Feb 12, 2004
Messages
374
Irvr = No lamers expecting you underwater, and everything that was to do with water fights and the water LOS issue.
 

Gahn

Resident Freddy
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
5,056
Vermillon said:
Irvr = No lamers expecting you underwater, and everything that was to do with water fights and the water LOS issue.

That's a wrong absumption ^^
 

Kinag

Part of the furniture
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
3,217
Niroth said:
Creating this iRvR shit ( a zergers wet dream ) is like giving a pyromaniac matches.

And showering a house with gasoline for him.
 

Sharkith

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Mar 11, 2005
Messages
2,798
Gahn said:
Is iRvR good for having fast action? Yes
Do iRvR incourage (sp?) zerg parties? Yes
Do iRvR puts balance even more in favour of fixed groups despite other players? Yes
Do iRvR leaves space for small groups/soloers? No

Now i can understand that for some lazy bastard getting a boat and having a ciggie between a run and another is too much, but tbh situations like yesterday night with 60+ Hibs in Emain, surely at least double Mids (moving mainly as a zerg, apart 2-3 fgs) and (i'd say) 30-50 Albs (hugging that fucking tower near bridge over and over), is stupid, imo. Been a good run till 21.30 uk, after that never been able to have a clean fight apart 1 underwater fight near Bolg Coastline :eek6:

a fair assessment tbh. We had a PUG group last night thankfully with Method a bard from your guild and we did ok thanks to him. However we did get totally zerged by Mids on several occassions.

The area for playing in Emain seems to be really small compared to HW. So not so sure this is any better at the moment - would it not make more sense down south maybe between Blog, nGed and Behn?

I am not really against it in principle since I can see a good few like it but it is not that great for groups up north in Hibland. Better down south where the terrain favours roaming. Plus the only bridge is at nGed and that is far enough away from Blog and Behn to remove the choke points. Maybe you should try it folks?

Sharkith
 

TheBinarySurfer

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
2,041
Tbh Mid gives the best irvr with glen/bled/blend imo - spread area - plenty of alternate access routes to each keep, poc nearby for the soloers to go etc etc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom