Guns are good enough, since they exist at all.
If guns we're outlawed, only outlaws would have guns.
so what?
It would mean the only people with guns are the ones specially trained to use them
I was talking about police, if every police officer has a gun then the chance of something like this is exponentially increased.It was towards no guns at all. Since this was a police shooting.
Not a discussion towards outlawing guns from civilians
I was talking about police, if every police officer has a gun then the chance of something like this is exponentially increased.
In the uk we have specially trained armed responce units which turn up, your average street bobby has no firearms at all
Your argument is also flawed, if police also have guns the criminals have bigger ones so the chance of someone dying is higher
you can't mistake a gun for a tazer
Noone here other than you said guns should be out altogether, in the context of this discussion we are talking about street police not specialist divisionsWell, flawed and "flawed" since that wasn't my argument as i was saying; if guns were out altogether, only criminals would have guns.
No.... again to repeat myself as the first time didnt sink inAnd guns don't bring bigger guns to criminals, as they would use them in case of these armed responce units too.
and in responce to YOUI think police officers should have guns though, in response to YOU, since criminals often do.
If i was a cop with a gun and some one i though had a gun reached for his picket i would shoot them. Not really 1100% clear on that situation yet.
As for Police with guns we have it right only highly trained officers held to a very high standard, that being said i do think more beat coppers should get stun guns as the chance of coming up agaist a knife is much higher now.
Guns are good enough, since they exist at all.
If guns we're outlawed, only outlaws would have guns.
Noone here other than you said guns should be out altogether, in the context of this discussion we are talking about street police not specialist divisions
/as if speaking to a retard voiceTitle + "This is what happens when you mix volatile situations with guns and humans."
In the UK street police dont have guns, neither do civilians (excluding criminals) a point i have repeated a few times nowIf the cops don't have guns, you think civilians would? That's a "banned altogether".
corrected for youTry again.
The title + original post indicate the desire to remove guns for good from street police and civilians.
You should keep your retard voice as it suites the content of what you type, see above in the context of the discussion (again street cops), they wouldnt have to have guns there would be a specially trained branch of the police to do that (a bit like, i dont know, real life?)And no, still no, (retard voice)since the first time didn't sink iiiiin(/retard voice)if police didn't carry guns, the criminals STILL would carry guns, just that the police could do sh*t all about it. <--fact.
Outlawed means illegal, illicit, unlawful not "taken out"Outlawed means completely taken out, cops n all.
It's a saying, f*cking Chronic just can't take it as such.
Proove it, as i said before there is no (read again, no as in the lack of) evidence to support that street police having guns has any negative effect on gun crime levelsStreet cops having guns or not, wouldn't effect anything but their security and YOUR security if criminals with guns DO appear.
You have yet to show in any credible way that it could be misconstrude beyond that. You even replied to DocWolf who stated that law enforcement could be done without the street police having guns (as he refers to british police who, as i have said already have a special division and as a generalisation it can be assumed "no police shouldnt have guns" refers to street police shouldnt have guns)Repeating that it's about street cops alone doesn't make it true, it's your opinion, not a FACT, no matter how much you call me a retard.
I don't buy that the cop pulled out his tazer by accident. Every cop know where his gun is. They practice drawing and shooting all the time. The tazer is usually strapped to a separate part of the body precisely to prevent such confusion. If a perp was running towards him with a gun he wouldn't pull his tazer out in error. The gun was pulled out deliberately IMO
NOT ACCEPTABLE!!!
It's not even like you could argue that "well it could of happened to you" in this case either, since most normal law abiding citizens wouldn't need to be flapping about on the floor trying to fight the policemen, but would be at least providing some form of co-operation.
Some handguns do not come with a safety switch he may have had one of them not defending him just saying its a maybe.