Which was kinda cool :(
O old.Wuzup101 Guest Feb 18, 2002 Thread starter #33 Hum..I just realized I'm only getting like 60fps in CS also...dammit...dammit...dammit....I want 99 back too....lol
Hum..I just realized I'm only getting like 60fps in CS also...dammit...dammit...dammit....I want 99 back too....lol
W Wilier Guest Feb 19, 2002 Thread starter #35 I did a 3dmark 2001 test today (first one ever) and got 2400 in 1152*864. Is this average for my set-up?? Athlon tbird 850@950 Abit kt7 raid 512 pc133 sdram GF2 mx400 BTW, the demo's they run in 3dmark are very pretty, arnt't they.?
I did a 3dmark 2001 test today (first one ever) and got 2400 in 1152*864. Is this average for my set-up?? Athlon tbird 850@950 Abit kt7 raid 512 pc133 sdram GF2 mx400 BTW, the demo's they run in 3dmark are very pretty, arnt't they.?
F FuZor Guest Feb 19, 2002 Thread starter #36 Dont know m8. But my rig gives a score of 6214. Which I was under the impression was fairly average
W Wilier Guest Feb 19, 2002 Thread starter #37 bugger, is that using the latest 3dmark, cos I know the scores differ. (i hope)
W Wilier Guest Feb 19, 2002 Thread starter #38 Ive just been and checked and guru of 3d have tested loads of gf2 mx400s, and my score appears to be on the average side. Quicksolv, unless your running a different card, I think you must have used a different version of 3dmark m8.
Ive just been and checked and guru of 3d have tested loads of gf2 mx400s, and my score appears to be on the average side. Quicksolv, unless your running a different card, I think you must have used a different version of 3dmark m8.
X Xavier Guest Feb 20, 2002 Thread starter #40 yeah, the gf2's will get such low scores due to their small frame buffers and lack of pixel/vertex shaders
yeah, the gf2's will get such low scores due to their small frame buffers and lack of pixel/vertex shaders
W Wilier Guest Feb 23, 2002 Thread starter #44 Fuck me, I only just got this one. Itll do for a year or so.