Originally posted by Damon_D
You didnt get my point did you.. WHAT DEFENCE DOES NS's AND SB's HAVE AGANINST BUFFED INFILS NADA NIX NUMBSDA.. We dont have diddly , but you think its you right to have a defence against buffed SB's and NS's ..geee that sounds fair...![]()
Originally posted by uma_thurman
I don't get you...I get flamed despite suggesting SB love. I guess there's no pleasing some people![]()
Originally posted by Puppetmistress
Giving infils 2.2x specpoints and removing DF will put Infils down to the bottom and make NS king of the hill.
You forgot to mention Nightshades have by far the best RA's (Avoid Pain, Wild Arcana, no matter what you tell me, WA is one of the best passive RA's for a Nightshade)
Originally posted by Lanfaer
same hp as my sb unbuffed, so what's your point?![]()
Originally posted by VodkaFairy
WA isn't the best passive RA for a nightshade, 15% to crit debuff.. weeee!!! Against a 80% chance a inf will get DF in. And that's still a rr1l0 infiltrator, a NS has to be rr2l0 (purge) rr4l9 (ap3) and voila, rr6l3 (wa3).
Originally posted by Lanfaer
For instance: at a milegate in emain I backstabbed an inf ~300+ then landed another blow for ~150+, the inf purged the poisons and started swinging, second swing was a DF which stunned me for those lovely 9secs, I was fully buffed at the moment and when stun wore off I had like 10-15% of hp left ... yeah it's really fair that infs should have an evadestyle with a long duration stun on it ... FOAD muppets
PS. flame wasn't intended specifically at Uma, but at infs in general who defend DF being evade>stun and long duration.
Originally posted by Crashtje
tha 200hps that a sb supposedly gets, aint always true because im sure Wittor / Elajt gets over 2k and i usually get 1975 _capped_ :/
Originally posted by witte-
2012hp but I have con 3 and though 3 and moa4 ;d
Originally posted by Aoln
Anyone noticed there was never any whine about this back when SBs had uber LA?![]()
Originally posted by Tafaya Anathas
Ok, but then let highlanders to be infils, add +200 hp, 2 hander weaps, kkthxbye
Originally posted by the_smurflord
Also you're forgetting that our two main stealth attack openers both have small stun components in them. So if you actually use your main opening attacks you invoke the 30 second stun immunity timer and render dragonfang useless. A pretty major drawback if you ask me.
Originally posted by case-rigantis
MY only defence against buffgimps like you is dragonfang
now FOAD with the rest of your buffgimp pals
Originally posted by -RG-Jaond
You can take out an buffed sb/ns cause of dragonfang and still dont think its overpowerd?
:scared:
Originally posted by bigchief
I would take a 6-7sec stun guaranteed over a 9sec 'if i get an evade in' stun anyday.
Originally posted by -RG-Jaond
aye its overpowerd
if a unbuffed class killing a fullybuffed class isnt overpowerd i dont know what is.
And pa dont do much cause the str/con debuff take out that
Originally posted by uma_thurman
Nobody has a god-given right to win every time just because they are buffed.
Originally posted by Tafaya Anathas
If some1 thinks DF is overpowered meet with Dracorn (50 slash 50 DW afaik) and then think about itBtw maybe in 1.66 Mythic totally redesign styles, so it has a great chance for changing DF.
Originally posted by taobitzz
Speaking of which anyone got level 20 inf gear spare on alb/excal?![]()