Character Popularity

O

old.Tyraette

Guest
Character Popularity

1. Sharma

:scared: :scared: :scared:

i really need glasses, i was scared for a second!
 
K

kalgarn

Guest
Originally posted by old.Tyraette
Character Popularity

1. Sharma

:scared: :scared: :scared:

i really need glasses, i was scared for a second!
:ROFLMAO:
 
A

Aule Valar

Guest
Originally posted by old.mattshanes
Mercenary has NEVER been fotm until 1.62 came..... and i would say about 80-90% of mercs who are rvring at the moment made well before that.Been playing mine over a year now and all this bollocks about zerkers can't hit like mercs/bms now is absolute shit, maybe the zerkers whining should ask grobirthir how does he hit around 250-300 mainhand on me.(which is good damage)

Also one more thing you say zerks are now mercs with studded, maybe... but you guys ALWAYS dual swing which means always hit cap speed with no damage loss.

Anyway, i noticed casters aren't so highly populated, i wonder if mythic will ever look at class population properly.

theurgists are gonna be sooo fotm in 1.65, time to go back to excal :eek:
 
O

old.Morchaoron

Guest
Minstrel was only fotm solo...

minstrels in a group are about as fotm as healing classes: every group needs them...

but still some (look at my sig) have the feeling that people only play minstrel to solo sbs and sos out of trouble, which is funny cuz i for one never solo xD
 
A

Artemls

Guest
What's wrong with FotM? Like I would care what other people think about the class I play. Fotm rules imo! Almost as fun as being called "08" by lappar and skåningar :p
 
A

aveh

Guest
Re: Re: Re: Re: Character Popularity

Originally posted by faderullan
Mercenery: Noone had mercs in groups when i made it. Hardly fotm then.
Minstrel: Ok i admit this was a fotm char when i made it. But that was pre 1.50.(I got lvl 50 2 days after 1.50 so i never played in the good times) And its hardly fotm after 1.50.
Cleric: Stopped playing my smiter when it was to good. Now i play it sometimes as a rej cleric. Never used him as a buffbot.

So who you now are. Stop talk if you dont know anything.

Look, you missed my point here..

I know that you started your merc back before they were fotm. God knows you've pointed it out enough times on this boards. No clue about your other chars really, but was just illustrating how lame it is to make stereotyped judgements. Labelling healers as FOTM is incredibly stupid as they are the backbone of all mid groups.

I also like how you labelled skalds as an OK class. Clearly you are the one who should stop talking.
 
I

ilum

Guest
Fader / Sycho made mercs fotm. Thats what happen when you got a nice class and use it to the fullest.

But believe me - If Albion had savages, noone would think about rolling a Mercenary ever again.
 
K

kalgarn

Guest
Originally posted by ilum
But believe me - If Albion had savages, noone would think about rolling a Mercenary ever again.
such lies,albs would never play fotm classes.they win with skillz and tacticz not fotm's :m00:
 
D

dokujin

Guest
From duskwave.dom/daoc:

Class statistics for server Prydwen
Class Realm Points Characters Avg. Level
1 Healer 85,428,925 1,299 29.02
2 Infiltrator 81,197,308 1,304 26.81
3 Shadowblade 76,413,469 1,307 25.66
4 Paladin 69,139,445 1,455 28.89
5 Skald 68,434,618 1,153 26.70
6 Cleric 66,739,970 1,536 29.05
7 Runemaster 63,013,769 1,073 27.09
8 Minstrel 58,979,849 1,081 26.28
9 Armsman 57,721,626 994 26.94
10 Shaman 57,133,399 1,694 29.13
11 Enchanter 50,667,142 1,751 28.85
12 Hero 46,591,701 1,306 27.67
13 Druid 46,192,029 1,423 30.14
14 Mercenary 45,922,988 712 26.26
15 Bard 44,364,457 1,327 29.86
16 Thane 39,818,988 835 28.41
17 Warrior 39,571,324 1,033 26.88
18 Hunter 39,271,951 1,124 23.62
19 Warden 39,117,483 869 30.02
20 Champion 38,489,407 716 28.63
21 Spiritmaster 37,149,835 1,111 26.42
22 Berserker 36,848,731 681 28.26
23 Wizard 36,528,590 1,294 24.99
24 Scout 34,712,847 1,008 24.82
25 Theurgist 32,688,142 744 25.82
26 Sorcerer 31,308,926 872 24.62
27 Eldritch 30,777,425 1,058 28.11
28 Nightshade 29,474,803 1,207 27.34
29 Ranger 27,173,838 1,134 26.94
30 Savage 26,585,216 1,401 22.48
31 Friar 22,113,166 1,001 25.66
32 Bonedancer 20,372,918 1,565 23.19
33 Blademaster 19,731,298 810 25.91
34 Mentalist 11,658,690 919 27.51
35 Cabalist 10,081,264 679 23.73
36 Necromancer 5,553,251 1,292 26.40
37 Reaver 4,967,037 594 22.36
38 Animist 2,343,229 892 24.80
39 Valewalker 1,191,597 789 24.99
 
U

Urgat Rip-Eye

Guest
STFU

1. Shaman 19% - Buffbots (yup)

You wanna just be quiet?

I have played a Shaman as my main (and only post 25 level character) since US beta.

Cave spec.

NOT a F*****g buffbot

And enjoyed immensly.

We are NOT all buff bots. Some of us actually like to play.
 
O

old.linnet

Guest
Re: STFU

Originally posted by Urgat Rip-Eye


We are NOT all buff bots. Some of us actually like to play.


I'd have thought the actively playing shamans would be most pissed off about all the buffbots, though? Do you think active players are outnumbered by buffbots?

No idea in Mid but wrt clerics, I'd figure it was possible, at least.
 
F

faderullan

Guest
I didnt say anything as the class shaman to play.

I said theres that many shamans because many out of them are buffbots. Same in albion where we have many clerics who are buffbots too.
 
F

faderullan

Guest
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Character Popularity

Originally posted by aveh
I also like how you labelled skalds as an OK class. Clearly you are the one who should stop talking.

I still think skald is a ok class. They do quite good frontload damage in assist trains.
 
C

Cush

Guest
Since the nerf of shamans from mythic a group need a buffbot to be able to buffup half decent. And 2 buffbots to buffup to the max. And one in the group for the end. So thats 2/3 shamans per group.
 
U

Urgat Rip-Eye

Guest
Yes

Do you think active players are outnumbered by buffbots?

Yes.

The number of silent dwarfs, trolls outside the PK's in HW and Emain is silly.

The solution is soo simple...

Make ALL buffs ranged, 2k-4k units would be about right.

Buffbot problem solved, without nerfing the support class players who actually like to group.

P**S easy in my opinion.

(And i agree with cushy... End regen as a con buff is a little unfair to midgard. At least make it a chant like the other realms.)
 
C

Cush

Guest
Re: Yes

Originally posted by Urgat Rip-Eye
Make ALL buffs ranged, 2k-4k units would be about right.

Problem with this is that GOA/Mythic and who ever else host DAOC servers would lose ~40% of there income if they did that. So dubt that will ever happen.
 
N

)nick(

Guest
Originally posted by Artemls
What's wrong with FotM? Like I would care what other people think about the class I play. Fotm rules imo! Almost as fun as being called "08" by lappar and skåningar :p

Joo is fjortis
 
N

)nick(

Guest
Re: Yes

Originally posted by Urgat Rip-Eye
Yes.

The number of silent dwarfs, trolls outside the PK's in HW and Emain is silly.

The solution is soo simple...

Make ALL buffs ranged, 2k-4k units would be about right.

Buffbot problem solved, without nerfing the support class players who actually like to group.

P**S easy in my opinion.

(And i agree with cushy... End regen as a con buff is a little unfair to midgard. At least make it a chant like the other realms.)

That would be a nerf to midgard as shamans dont have enough conc to go around.
 
S

scarffs

Guest
Wel make end a chant and buffs ranged, problem solved.
This was stated above also.
 
O

old.Morchaoron

Guest
36 Necromancer 5,553,251 1,292 26.40
37 Reaver 4,967,037 594 22.36
38 Animist 2,343,229 892 24.80
39 Valewalker 1,191,597 789 24.99

at the bottom of the list... wow.......
 
M

mavericky

Guest
Originally posted by scarffs
Wel make end a chant and buffs ranged, problem solved.
This was stated above also.


The trouble with ranged buffs is that it forces any buffing class to max buffs or be rejected in groups for a /stick buffbot, no shammies would be able to spec cave any longer for fear of group rejection.
 
D

Dunmer

Guest
Originally posted by ilum
Fader / Sycho made mercs fotm. Thats what happen when you got a nice class and use it to the fullest.

But believe me - If Albion had savages, noone would think about rolling a Mercenary ever again.

I didn't make merc FOTM :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
 
J

jobil

Guest
Originally posted by kain_pravus

I hear the nerf bat being warmed up, supression life drain on a timmer, savages damaged molested like the zerkers and pac healers with the stopping power of a wet fart.


I cleared a bus with one of those farts once....
 
V

vermillon

Guest
Re: Yes

Originally posted by Urgat Rip-Eye
(And i agree with cushy... End regen as a con buff is a little unfair to midgard. At least make it a chant like the other realms.)

1. You will not say that when you will need to pl your new /lvl character. End regen 4 without the need of the shammen to be grouped is... uber solo xp. Buffs>chant
2. As for rvr still buff >> chant / song as is never stop if the shamman is stuned/mezzed, you don't get : xxxx attack you and your sond is interupted: msg either.
3.There sould be a way that you can stop the end regen from all groups. Paladin = mezz/stun, Bard = Interupt/kill , Shamman = kill/mezz.
 
J

Jenna.

Guest
Re: Re: Yes

Originally posted by vermillon
1. You will not say that when you will need to pl your new /lvl character. End regen 4 without the need of the shammen to be grouped is... uber solo xp. Buffs>chant
2. As for rvr still buff >> chant / song as is never stop if the shamman is stuned/mezzed, you don't get : xxxx attack you and your sond is interupted: msg either.
3.There sould be a way that you can stop the end regen from all groups. Paladin = mezz/stun, Bard = Interupt/kill , Shamman = kill/mezz.

Chants dont use concslots and force you to use buffbots to get decent buffs tho ~~
 
B

Biby

Guest
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Character Popularity

Originally posted by faderullan
I still think skald is a ok class. They do quite good frontload damage in assist trains.

Again and again i see that u not the smartest guy if we talking about Daoc :eek:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Similar threads

E
Replies
87
Views
5K
Bleam
B
A
Replies
7
Views
892
Jupitus
J
O
Replies
9
Views
924
vayasen
V
L
Replies
12
Views
927
problems_daoc
P
G
Replies
41
Views
3K
nobrot
N
Top Bottom