G
gargultroll
Guest
- Thread starter
- #31
Bye bye sala....sad to see u leave..
Originally posted by glorien_
LoL - its only since u SBs got fixed that you say its overpowered cos before it didnt mean shit to u and u could simply kill the infil after the stun ran out. TBH you should go a year with DF before they even talk about a nerf like infils did with LA...
Originally posted by saltymcpepper
i think the real question is, whos ass is envenom/aada going to sniff now
Originally posted by stunned
Yours if it didnt smell vaseline every day.
Originally posted by [PDC]Alexie
cu sala .
aada is a good shadowblade aswell, who ironically specced SZ when it got nerfed why flame him cos he > u . Dragonfang has proved how overpowered it is since the LA nerf :/
Originally posted by Shaurr
So another alb who justifies the situation by trusting in Mythic and saying its not a nerf, its a fix and now SBs are what they should have been, like perfect? Sorry to be cynical but SB's are meant to be able to deal with infs and NS just like infs and ns can deal with each other and sbs. At this time SBs cant do that. Please don't claim they can and don't say Midgard don't need to be able to kill enemy stealthers just like the other realms do, no, SBs shouldn't kill casters only since inf and ns kill what they want. So please stfu with the fixed thing allready and stop trusting in Mythic, after all, it might be you next. You surely know SBs took a swing for population control issues and Mythics hurry-up attitude to just bypass SB and their needs after LA reduction. After awhile "SBs as meant to be" will show that Mythic will give them something and what then? WIll that mean Sbs are not what they are meant to be and fixed now? I bet every alb happy with sbs now are around 15 years old, empotionally retarded, pay no mind to what is intelligent and the kinds of persons who laugh at handicapped people at streets. Sbs are handicapped now.
Yes, lets have some smartguy with one or two liner to comment on this, in way like: "deal with it, whine etc." not to forget that smiley. Allso it would be nice if some person tells us Sb players what we doing wrong, Im sure some nonSB player has figured out how Mythic meant us to be played. You guys, its ok, seriously, no need to think about this any deeper, just make yourself heard, have a beer and and drool away as you try to think of a suitable flame. Its what kiddos do after all. Most SB flamers are propably the kinds of kids who allways got upset if their parents didn't let them win some boardgame.
Originally posted by Kalhid_
bye sala ( u are the best
heard of CD? ;dddOriginally posted by Loveless
Always sad to see a fellow mid leave. HF in what ever you do.
And SBs are not inline cos they dont have a viable DW line ;(
Originally posted by azshara
heard of CD? ;ddd
Originally posted by salamurhaaja
I NEVER made my SB to be FoTM sz.
I made him long before SBs started shining.
Pin, Sst, Brommix, Gawain, Remi + other old timers...
You know the truth that made SBs so powerful: Relics.
Only one word: Relics.
Albs had str-relics when I started my SB career (think it was 1.56 or something).
And there was zero, ZERO, zero, ZERO posts about SBs doing too much damage.
Why???
Can you answer me Pin why SB damage wasn't worth whine back when you played? It was same damage back then than SBs made in 1.60.
You guys remember one week when albs had str-relics in 1.60?
Was inf > sb.
Relics.
Not LA-styles like you claim.
Originally posted by salamurhaaja
I NEVER made my SB to be FoTM sz.
I made him long before SBs started shining.
Pin, Sst, Brommix, Gawain, Remi + other old timers...
You know the truth that made SBs so powerful: Relics.
Only one word: Relics.
Albs had str-relics when I started my SB career (think it was 1.56 or something).
And there was zero, ZERO, zero, ZERO posts about SBs doing too much damage.
Why???
Can you answer me Pin why SB damage wasn't worth whine back when you played? It was same damage back then than SBs made in 1.60.
You guys remember one week when albs had str-relics in 1.60?
Was inf > sb.
Relics.
Not LA-styles like you claim.
Originally posted by salamurhaaja
I NEVER made my SB to be FoTM sz.
I made him long before SBs started shining.
Pin, Sst, Brommix, Gawain, Remi + other old timers...
You know the truth that made SBs so powerful: Relics.
Only one word: Relics.
Albs had str-relics when I started my SB career (think it was 1.56 or something).
And there was zero, ZERO, zero, ZERO posts about SBs doing too much damage.
Why???
Can you answer me Pin why SB damage wasn't worth whine back when you played? It was same damage back then than SBs made in 1.60.
You guys remember one week when albs had str-relics in 1.60?
Was inf > sb.
Relics.
Not LA-styles like you claim.
infs > sbs
scouts > Hunters
pallys > thanes or skalds
friar > thanes or skalds
armsman < Warrior
Merc >> Zerk
Originally posted by Iswind
they wont rest untill every mid char is subpar
infs > sbs
scouts > Hunters
pallys > thanes or skalds
friar > thanes or skalds
armsman < Warrior
Merc >> Zerk
And finally Reaver < Savage but not as much as ppl wants mythic to belive i for one think h2h savages are balanced but 2h savages quad hitting are a bit much
Originally posted by Heist
ofc you are sad, one less sb for you to zerg