Heh, look who's talking
Me?
Unless someone else is on my account...?
=/
Heh, look who's talking
Hmh. Well, evidently saying "apologies for being harsh" gets nothing in return.
How about....calm down, read the thread entirely and see if maybe YOU overreacted this time.
If you had read my posts, and even if they were a bit harsh(which i apologised like a grownup does when knows he's wrong) i never attacked you. I brought a point forward by using an example as touchy as mine was.
EDIT: Oh and if this gets modded because Eq had a fit, it's probably 'cause girls arn't normal forum people *grin*
Toh toh, you did, but have apologised.
Ez hasn't brought in any personal attacks directed at anyone on these forums, it is others who have done so.
Toh toh, you did, but have apologised.
NikonL, watch your step very closely.:touch:
I love you tho, Evers!drama queen
I love you tho, Evers!
aren't you quite tubby ez? surely you could be classified as lazy if anyone can?
What I said was no worse than what gets said on these forums every day. I understand that Ezteq gets more sympathy A) Because she is a nice person B) Because she is a girl, but today she made a mistake. Even the nicest possible people occasionally come out with a line that is flat out wrong, and today was Ez's day. I'd ask that if you demand something from me, or feel the need to punish me, then you also ask the same from Ezteq, for the offence she may have caused people regardless of whether she knew them or not.
NikonL - your posting was directed at an individual and hence constitutes an attack against said individual, simple as that. Ezteq's comments were not directed at an individual, they were just a general point of view. Back off now.
look up, mikahgirl did an attack calling nikon a moron, warn him.
But i repped him so it doesn't count ^^
you should get a room
NikonL - your posting was directed at an individual and hence constitutes an attack against said individual, simple as that. Ezteq's comments were not directed at an individual, they were just a general point of view. Back off now.
NikonL - your posting was directed at an individual and hence constitutes an attack against said individual, simple as that. Ezteq's comments were not directed at an individual, they were just a general point of view. Back off now.
if you're sure ez will apologize - how come you mentioned toh in your first post?Seel made the first attack, Ez countered, Seel apologised, I'm sure Ez will also.
NikonL attacked.
*shrug*
Should NikonL be allowed to attack anyone on the forum if they happen to have flamed another member? Surely it is the job of the mods to read reported threads and keep an eye on behaviour?
Is NikonL suddenley the secret vigilante protector of Teh Seel?
Should I be making NikonL a mod, or telling him off for personal attacks?
Seel made the first attack, Ez countered, Seel apologised, I'm sure Ez will also.
NikonL attacked.
*shrug*
Should NikonL be allowed to attack anyone on the forum if they happen to have flamed another member? Surely it is the job of the mods to read reported threads and keep an eye on behaviour?
Is NikonL suddenley the secret vigilante protector of Teh Seel?
Should I be making NikonL a mod, or telling him off for personal attacks?
Seel made the first attack, Ez countered, Seel apologised, I'm sure Ez will also.
NikonL attacked.
*shrug*
Should NikonL be allowed to attack anyone on the forum if they happen to have flamed another member? Surely it is the job of the mods to read reported threads and keep an eye on behaviour?
Is NikonL suddenley the secret vigilante protector of Teh Seel?
Should I be making NikonL a mod, or telling him off for personal attacks?
Rest assured I would be acting the same way even if it was Bugz that Ez was attacking (Bugz is probably my least favourite forum member at this moment in time). Seel is old enough that he can take care of himself, I was not "standing up" for him i was merely pointing out that it is unfair if Ez is allowed to launch a personal attack (even in retalliation) and I am not.
Rest assured I would be acting the same way even if it was Bugz that Ez was attacking (Bugz is probably my least favourite forum member at this moment in time). Seel is old enough that he can take care of himself, I was not "standing up" for him i was merely pointing out that it is unfair if Ez is allowed to launch a personal attack (even in retalliation) and I am not.
Actually i don't even think this involves anyone else(no offence) then me and Eq.
It went down as such:
I was harsh, but wasn't trying to attack, which it was seen as.
I retaliated to the attack on me(unaware of being seen as the attack'ee)
Eq defended(as she should)
Some more argument and words thronw.
I noticed later that i HAD unintentionally attacked Eq, apologised as should.
It's all there is really, no need to attack Eq, she did whatever anyone would and Jup did his job. With a nice touch of not using the ban/lock stick i might add.
certain people find the word twit to be highly offensive Oo
aren't you quite tubby ez? surely you could be classified as lazy if anyone can?