E
Erekrose
Guest
Considering my BM spec at the moment which was a boring,
44 Blades 44 CD & 44 Parry.
Im now thinking of
39 Blades 39 Pierce 39 CD & 35 Parry
Has anyone tried a spec like this before?
Would I need the pierce weapon in my main hand if I wanted to use a pierce style? Or could I use a pierce style as long as pierce weapon was in any hand? Would Pierce/Blunt or Blunt/Blades be better? Basically what i mean is if i wield pierce & blade in each hand will i have access to both sets of styles. I’m a Firby BM by the way.
Any thoughts, flames welcome.
44 Blades 44 CD & 44 Parry.
Im now thinking of
39 Blades 39 Pierce 39 CD & 35 Parry
Has anyone tried a spec like this before?
Would I need the pierce weapon in my main hand if I wanted to use a pierce style? Or could I use a pierce style as long as pierce weapon was in any hand? Would Pierce/Blunt or Blunt/Blades be better? Basically what i mean is if i wield pierce & blade in each hand will i have access to both sets of styles. I’m a Firby BM by the way.
Any thoughts, flames welcome.