Are Midgard ppl ready for NF zergs?

[Kikerumbo]

Since three days we are being farmed in our realm.

The BGs for realm defense are so cunfusing, some ppl don´t listen and so many ppl prefer to go alone to leech more rps.

I can´t remember when I saw an Alb alone the last time. Neither, I can´t remeber Midgard going around eMain with more than 2FG and when there were 2FG they PM to each other to leave away to don´t leech.

Seems that Hibernia is the unpopulated realm, but... a FG of animists can defend a keep with they mushrooms, better than a lot of FGs.

What do you think about this new NF times?

Have fun and good luck.

 

[Icebreaker]

Same Problems Hibs had in their Frontier a few Days ago. You can't defend against 2 Realms. Albs have the highest Pop but the battle will come to them soon too. Then we see how they do.

 

[Xplo]

If a person like Tappi leads the zerg a bit, it can not be stopped.

 

[Sendraks]

Well I've seen Mids zerging plenty since NF came out, so I wouldn't operate under the illusion that you're any different to Alb or Hib.

Monday night, or was it Tuesday, Mids were out and about with an impressive show of force. Took us until 11:30pm GMT to take back the Alb keeps you mids had taken.

So is Midgard ready for the zerg? I'd say so.

 

[Dangart]

Both hibs and mids were attacking alb frontier the other day, mids had both berk and beno if i recall correctly, and hibs kept attacking surs towers, by the end of the day albs had them all back though

 

[Chronictank]

We dont have a choice its just hold what u can and keep the zerg at bay for as long as possible.

Im just waiting for glottis to turn up with his usual omg mid have same numbers as albs comments

 

[Aussie]

mid have same numbers as albs comments

Rank Albion Hibernia Midgard 
RR10 26      29       24  
RR9  23      34       27 
RR8  59      50       58  
RR7  119     77       113 
RR6  202     155      194  
RR5  354     254      352 
RR4  650     394      594 
RR3  1,082   777      1,039 
RR2  1,597   1,008    1,326

not counting thidranki r1 shit, alb& mid seems like very balanced .

 

[Chronictank]

            Albion      Hibernia    Midgard
Level 50's 4,377 (40%) 2,989 (27%) 3,701 (33%)

mm hmm

 

[Fana]

Problem is there are only two leaders in Mid that most people will listen to and take orders from; ardamel and ladonna. If neither of those are online then all large scale cooperation in midgard stops functioning. Ruathian and some others have done their best to lead but it doesnt help much when half the bg wont do what they say and the other half will try to lead as well. We are also not very good at organizing ourselves into fullgrps. Seems our bg's are usually 2-4 fullgrps and rest soloers or grps of 2-4 people or so. I guess its the midgard elite-fullgrp spirit that lives on, making people wait for that perfect opted grp rather than inviting whatever.

 

[Aussie]

            Albion      Hibernia    Midgard
Level 50's 4,377 (40%) 2,989 (27%) 3,701 (33%)

mm hmm

albs got more 2e accounts? albs got more bb's?... if you compare the RR list alb & mid is in complete balance.

 

[Alithiel]

            Albion      Hibernia    Midgard
Level 50's 4,377 (40%) 2,989 (27%) 3,701 (33%)

mm hmm

You only have to look at Killrake's sig to know that those statistics mean absolutely nothing...

 

[Larc]

You only have to look at Killrake's sig to know that those statistics mean absolutely nothing...

Real chart:

             Albion       Hibernia     Midgard      Killrake
Level 50's  4,377 (40%) 2,989 (27%) 3,701 (23%) 1500 (10%)

 

[Dorin]

Real chart:

             Albion       Hibernia     Midgard      Killrake
Level 50's  4,377 (40%) 2,989 (27%) 3,701 (23%) 1500 (10%)

lol :_O

 

[Divinia]

RR numbers are the only accurate ones, and albion got a huge advantage "tacticwise" since theyre more experience in organizing larger groups of people (Big RR's, most lowbies have gotten rvr trough zergs instead of mids who have made grp->die->disband>farm df and albs have more faith in their leaders i assume.)

 

[Castus]

Problem is there are only two leaders in Mid that most people will listen to and take orders from; ardamel and ladonna. If neither of those are online then all large scale cooperation in midgard stops functioning. Ruathian and some others have done their best to lead but it doesnt help much when half the bg wont do what they say and the other half will try to lead as well. We are also not very good at organizing ourselves into fullgrps. Seems our bg's are usually 2-4 fullgrps and rest soloers or grps of 2-4 people or so. I guess its the midgard elite-fullgrp spirit that lives on, making people wait for that perfect opted grp rather than inviting whatever.

SPOT on and just what i was saying in guildchat last night.

 

[Matmardigan]

We'll get u ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

 

[Calo]

dont forget that albs have alot more casters then midgard, more casters with higher rr, because midgard is a tankrealm and they even have more range...

which is a FACT that matters in NF.

 

[Urme the Legend]

albion got a huge advantage "tacticwise" since theyre more experience in organizing larger groups of people

Translation: Albion got a huge advantage "zergingwise" since they are more experienced in zerging.

 

[Divinia]

Translation: Albion got a huge advantage "zergingwise" since they are more experienced in zerging.

Excalibur
UrMe 50 Warrior [RR6L7] [WC:1121] [ML10]
Mortality 50 Huntress [RR4L9] [ML10]
Fai 50 Shaman [RR3L5] [ML10]
Mohaha 50 SM [RR3L3] [ML10]
Emru 50 Shaman [RR3L0] [ML0]
+ more lvl 50 crap alts.
<Fellowship of Midgard>
www.fom.nu

 

[Urme the Legend]

 

[AngelHeal]

Albion Hibernia Midgard
Level 50's 4,377 (40%) 2,989 (27%) 3,701 (33%)

mm hmm

what hmm hmmm??

u ever saw 11000 people on exca online?
maybe just because albs have more lvl 50's on 1 account?
and maybe thats why there are so many "warders" ??

 

[AngelHeal]

Real chart:

Albion Hibernia Midgard Killrake
Level 50's 4,377 (40%) 2,989 (27%) 3,701 (23%) 1500 (10%)

LAARRCIIEEE!!!!:wub: :wub: :wub:

 

[HerculesPluto]

Translation: Albion got a huge advantage "zergingwise" since they are more experienced in zerging.

lol

 

[Serathule]

The difference between mid and the alb population isnt so big tbh.. if its 2000 players online on excal and u do /who in albion it count 500-600.. dunno if it counts anon but i dont think albion have 500 anon tbh..so the numbers should say a little about the population.. altho what we are talking about now seems to be RvR.. and then we maybe should count the lvl 50s..

 

[Phule_Gubben]

maybe u have some 400 anon in alb then cause when I did a /who all with 2100+ online it showed we had 566 ppl online + i did a /who uppland and i counted to some 25+ shamans standing there, most not anon.

 

[Larc]

LAARRCIIEEE!!!!:wub:

asardoggieeeeeee :wub:

 

[Framfall]

If a person like Tappi leads the zerg a bit, it can not be stopped.

And you bow down to his shrine each morning in your cellar?

 

[Glottis]

            Albion      Hibernia    Midgard
Level 50's 4,377 (40%) 2,989 (27%) 3,701 (33%)

mm hmm

Like everbody with half a brain has told you numerous times, rr1's do not count... Aussie results are more representative than the numbers you look at.
But then again, it would not proof your point, so lets ignore it...
Regards, Glottis

 

[Claudius]

            Albion      Hibernia    Midgard
Level 50's 4,377 (40%) 2,989 (27%) 3,701 (33%)

mm hmm

Albs have around 10% more people in RvR than Mids. It might change now that we got a new relic situation, but up untill Mids lost str relic this was the situation.

 

[Namefake]

albs got more 2e accounts? albs got more bb's?... if you compare the RR list alb & mid is in complete balance.

ye, due to u ppl got more lvl 50 main chars that need bbs.