- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 36,070
So. What IS anti-semitism?
We've had discussions around the nature of what constitutes a jew and the waters are very muddy. Accusations of racism fly - when Judaism is a religion, and jews are members of that religion, not a race all of their own. But there's a push for jews to be seen as a specific race - we've disagreed over this definition on FH before - and in my personal opinion it's because it strengthens the hand of the Israel lobby. People get jumped on for expressing opinions that aren't anti-semitic simply because they're not expressing this, in my opinion, untruthful view of what constitutes a jew.
So today's story about the vice-chair of Momentum being called on to resign for being anti-semitic - despite her and her partner being jewish - by a transport union, the TSSA - is what's got me a little peeved.
Listening to the audio (can be reached via a link in the link) - she makes reasonable points in my opinion.
If a Jewish woman can't find a definition of anti-semitism that she can work with and can't bring that opinion up without groups wanting to take her down then it seems plain to me that the objectives of many of these groups is to shut down reasonable dialogue. I get that there'll be a lot of un-reasonable things said if discussion is allowed to happen - but it doesn't justify shutting discussion down.
So, can the hotbed of high-intellectual debate that is Freddyshouse come up with a workable definition of antisemitism in the absence of one from any other source on the planet?
We've had discussions around the nature of what constitutes a jew and the waters are very muddy. Accusations of racism fly - when Judaism is a religion, and jews are members of that religion, not a race all of their own. But there's a push for jews to be seen as a specific race - we've disagreed over this definition on FH before - and in my personal opinion it's because it strengthens the hand of the Israel lobby. People get jumped on for expressing opinions that aren't anti-semitic simply because they're not expressing this, in my opinion, untruthful view of what constitutes a jew.
So today's story about the vice-chair of Momentum being called on to resign for being anti-semitic - despite her and her partner being jewish - by a transport union, the TSSA - is what's got me a little peeved.
Listening to the audio (can be reached via a link in the link) - she makes reasonable points in my opinion.
If a Jewish woman can't find a definition of anti-semitism that she can work with and can't bring that opinion up without groups wanting to take her down then it seems plain to me that the objectives of many of these groups is to shut down reasonable dialogue. I get that there'll be a lot of un-reasonable things said if discussion is allowed to happen - but it doesn't justify shutting discussion down.
So, can the hotbed of high-intellectual debate that is Freddyshouse come up with a workable definition of antisemitism in the absence of one from any other source on the planet?