agramon monday query

Status
Not open for further replies.

Slayn

Loyal Freddie
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
111
I'm closing this thread - its simply turning into whine and isn't on the original topic.

If you want to discuss the policy of my guild in more detail, feel free to PM me to chat about it.

Cheers

Thread this refers to is here: https://forums.freddyshouse.com/showthread.php?t=193994

I'm a little bewildered as to how a thread titled agramon-monday, which contains purely discussions of events in agramon on monday, could be considered off-topic?

Unless there is certain stuff that someone who happens to be a member of a certain guild (and who also happens to be a mod) would prefer to have swept under the carpet?

/shrug
 

Manisch Depressiv

Part of the furniture
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
7,727
How about one person from each guild gets FH mod rights so the rights can be gayed to close unwanted whine about guilds?

...
 

Succi

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 24, 2004
Messages
1,266
Synergy got proved to be liars, owned ... so a synergy mod closed the thread it looks like =]
 

Raven

Fuck the Tories!
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
45,234
flim uses radar, and he is a mod! nobody can die that often without perma finding stuff to smite!
 

Zaffa

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
296
Radar accusations!!! rable rable rable ban raven rable rable rable. Get the torches mejjts, we gonna lynch him now!
lol
 

eggy

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
5,283
The Agromon bit was great :) good reading.

It turned into an add flame, which happened to be against Synergy.

It was not closed because of the targetted guild, but because it was beginning to turn from a discussion into a targetted flame. I was unsure if it should be closed, so checked with Flim who said it was fair to do so.

I've passed the message onto Flim, who will reopen it if deemed necessary.
 

Slayn

Loyal Freddie
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
111
eggy said:
The Agromon bit was great :) good reading.

It turned into an add flame, which happened to be against Synergy.

It was not closed because of the targetted guild, but because it was beginning to turn from a discussion into a targetted flame. I was unsure if it should be closed, so checked with Flim who said it was fair to do so.

I've passed the message onto Flim, who will reopen it if deemed necessary.

If that's your take on the thread I don't doubt you. Whether a thread merits closing is a subjective thing.

My personal reading on the thread though, was that it if you read the posts from yourself, sharkith, shike, spook, and other people, they are all very constructive and they continue right until the last page.

If it had been anything other than a Synergy mod who had closed the thread it would simply be a decision i disagreed with. However, in these circumstances it's both a decision I disagree with and one which gives me huge doubts about the way mods behave on this forum and their level of bias. I just can't picture you doing the same were it another guild, because there is absolutely no personal abuse, cheating accusations, trolling etc. that would normally merit thread closure.

In my eyes, a) the behaviour is anomalous and b) there exists clear motive/reason for bias on the part of the mod.

Bit smelly imo but /shrug
 

eggy

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
5,283
I understand your perception. If the other mods think my actions were too harsh, they will reinstate the thread as requested I am sure, as I fully understand why there could be seen to be bias in this case.

I'll leave it in Flim's more than capable hands as a neutral party. The matter is closed until reviewed.

Regards
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom