3DMark2001SE & PCMark2002 Scores

B

bids

Guest
P4 2 Ghz, 256 DDR RAM, Geforce4 Ti4200, WinXP Pro

8657

This sound about right ?
 
K

kryt

Guest
8745

amd 1800xp gf4 ti4200 64mb, 512mb DDR ram , win2k pro sp2
 
H

Happy Go Lucky

Guest
Originally posted by FatBusinessman


Wow, that makes me feel so much better :D
Click to expand...

:(

me steps up search for a faster cpu
 
F

FatBusinessman

Guest
I think a better graphics card would probably give you a better performance increase for your money. Then again, I don't really know how much of a gap there is between Athlons and Durexes.
 
T

throdgrain

Guest
9350,
XP2.0 GF4 4400 128mb ,512 ddr Win XP.

(Not very interesting, but Im satisfied atm :) )
 
H

Happy Go Lucky

Guest
Originally posted by FatBusinessman
I think a better graphics card would probably give you a better performance increase for your money. Then again, I don't really know how much of a gap there is between Athlons and Durexes.
Click to expand...

Both would be nice ;)

*sighs at red ink on bank balance*

I can prolly just about play the new games on low detail, considering the tests are done in higher res to what I normally play in, I should have some breathing space. :(

Tho that may change come christmas when the new Shit comes out.
 
F

FatBusinessman

Guest
I need a new video card.
I need more money for a new video card.

I need a job.... :(
 
F

FatBusinessman

Guest
Ok, how's this for weird:

I get 2489, then realise I'm on 2x AGP.

So I enable 4x AGP.

I re-run the benchmark.

I get 2393.

I get confused...
 
B

bodhi

Guest
4500 ish on a P4 1.7, 512MB RDRAM, ATi Radeon 64Mb DDR and Windows XP.


Should get some really nice scores if I decide to slot in a Radeon 9700 tho :)
 
F

FatBusinessman

Guest
3029

Got given a Radeon 7500 yesterday - seems to have made a small improvement...
 
B

bids

Guest
I have just taken delivery of a new 19" TFT screen and my 3DMark SE has gone up from 8500 'ish to 9500 'ish (P4 2Ghz, Ti4200, 512 Mb DDR.

I know the response time of the screen is better (15ms as opposed to 20 odd), but I'm (pleasently) suprised by the size of the increase :)
 
F

FatBusinessman

Guest
3292 :)

Disabled all the useless crap that Windows runs automatically :)
 
H

Happy Go Lucky

Guest
1906 -> 2496 :)

With no overclocking,

there was me thinking the later drivers were just for the geforce4's :eek:
put the memory setting up aswell :/
 
T

Tenko

Guest
Originally posted by granny
6400

Seems a tad low for an athlon 1800+/GF3?
Click to expand...

About the same as I got with same set-up.

6469

Must be nearly time for a GF4 I think :)
 
H

Happy Go Lucky

Guest
My new & best benchmark 2627

I am now 3rd in the mad onion project database for duron 850 , gf2mx/mx400, windows 2000. With 3 pages of projects. It's amazing to see the variation of computers with the same as me, they go low as 1001 and I thought my orginal 1906 was shitty.

No.2 is 2648

No.1 is 2656

So not much in it. :-\

Any way I have taken my current setup as far as it'll go, :D

Now to start to think seriously of upgrading :cool:
 
F

FatBusinessman

Guest
3615 :D

Found out I could clock my memory higher than my FSB, so I did.
 
D

djpringle

Guest
10276

Strange, normally it's in the high 9000's but today it seems to excelled itself :confused:
 
S

(Shovel)

Guest
New nVidia drivers and Latest 4-in-1s gives me:

2365.

Puts me above average for my GFX card so that'll do me fine :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Top Bottom