S
syk.chak
Guest
- Thread starter
- #61
W
WPKenny
Guest
- Thread starter
- #63
WOOHOO!!! 12280 !!
Basically put the chip and mobo in, Windows XP blue screen on first boot, I repaired that and ran this straight after. So I reckon there's a lot of room for improvement once I've reformated.
Basically put the chip and mobo in, Windows XP blue screen on first boot, I repaired that and ran this straight after. So I reckon there's a lot of room for improvement once I've reformated.
E
Embattle
Guest
- Thread starter
- #64
W
Wilier
Guest
- Thread starter
- #65
erm,
6970.
XP2000
msi kt3 ultra
512 2700 ddr
inno 3d gf3 ti200
6970.
XP2000
msi kt3 ultra
512 2700 ddr
inno 3d gf3 ti200
W
Wilier
Guest
- Thread starter
- #66
But wait,
9680
as above but new card,
Albatron Ti4200p
On stock settings I reckon thats not too shabby. I should break 10grand with a tweak or two.
9680
as above but new card,
Albatron Ti4200p
On stock settings I reckon thats not too shabby. I should break 10grand with a tweak or two.
W
Wilier
Guest
- Thread starter
- #67
YAY, 10050.
Tweaked the card a bit, stable as a , erm, really stable thing.
Gah, triple posting whoooore.
Tweaked the card a bit, stable as a , erm, really stable thing.
Gah, triple posting whoooore.
M
Moön
Guest
- Thread starter
- #68
My latest result with all standard clocks 12137
Its suprising how much difference changing motherboards has been, first I got 10500 using an Asus A7S, then I got 11500 with an Asus A7V and now its 12000+ with an Abit AT7-MAX2. (all with standard clock speeds)
Next time I dont think I'l be as tight when buying a mobo
Its suprising how much difference changing motherboards has been, first I got 10500 using an Asus A7S, then I got 11500 with an Asus A7V and now its 12000+ with an Abit AT7-MAX2. (all with standard clock speeds)
Next time I dont think I'l be as tight when buying a mobo
H
Happy Go Lucky
Guest
- Thread starter
- #70
Never thought I'd ever have nvidia's fastest available card.
suddeningly I'm not ashamed of my computer any more
Nice to break the 10k barrier
suddeningly I'm not ashamed of my computer any more
Nice to break the 10k barrier
A
adams901
Guest
- Thread starter
- #71
There's something wrong with my PCMark scores look
System Configuration
Operating System Microsoft Windows XP
DirectX Version 8.1
Mobo Manufacturer ASUSTeK Computer INC.
Mobo Model A7V8X
AGP Rates (Current/Available) 4x / 1x 2x 4x
CPU Missing CPU 1760 MHz
FSB 133 MHz
Memory 1024 MB
Graphics Chipset NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4600
Driver Name ASUS V8460 ULTRA DELUXE v31.40F
Driver Version 6.13.10.3140
Video Memory 128 MB
Test Results
CPU Score 5218
Memory Score 3088
HDD Score 111
http://service.futuremark.com/servl...rojectdetails&projectType=7&projectId=1036301
D
danger
Guest
- Thread starter
- #72
Bah my 3Dmarks are a bit poor....
9154
Athlon XP 2000
GF4 ti4200 128mb
256mb PC2700
Abit KX7-333
No overclockage.... looking at Wills and everyone elses on the site I should be getting at least 1000 maybe even 2000 more
9154
Athlon XP 2000
GF4 ti4200 128mb
256mb PC2700
Abit KX7-333
No overclockage.... looking at Wills and everyone elses on the site I should be getting at least 1000 maybe even 2000 more
E
Embattle
Guest
- Thread starter
- #73
Re:
First two are alright but the last one, HDD Score, seems to be very wrong indeed mate.
Originally posted by adams901
There's something wrong with my PCMark scores look
System Configuration
Operating System Microsoft Windows XP
DirectX Version 8.1
Mobo Manufacturer ASUSTeK Computer INC.
Mobo Model A7V8X
AGP Rates (Current/Available) 4x / 1x 2x 4x
CPU Missing CPU 1760 MHz
FSB 133 MHz
Memory 1024 MB
Graphics Chipset NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4600
Driver Name ASUS V8460 ULTRA DELUXE v31.40F
Driver Version 6.13.10.3140
Video Memory 128 MB
Test Results
CPU Score 5218
Memory Score 3088
HDD Score 111
http://service.futuremark.com/servl...rojectdetails&projectType=7&projectId=1036301
First two are alright but the last one, HDD Score, seems to be very wrong indeed mate.
W
Wilier
Guest
- Thread starter
- #75
Originally posted by ^Danger
Bah my 3Dmarks are a bit poor....
9154
Athlon XP 2000
GF4 ti4200 128mb
256mb PC2700
Abit KX7-333
No overclockage.... looking at Wills and everyone elses on the site I should be getting at least 1000 maybe even 2000 more
Guess Im just better than you
S
Sawtooth
Guest
- Thread starter
- #76
12558
Athlon XP 2200
0.5GB 2700? DDR
ATI 9700 PRO DDR graphic
Thats the 3dmarks result
http://service.futuremark.com/servl...rojectdetails&projectType=7&projectId=1041439
Not sure what this all means really. Runs well enough for me games.
Athlon XP 2200
0.5GB 2700? DDR
ATI 9700 PRO DDR graphic
Thats the 3dmarks result
http://service.futuremark.com/servl...rojectdetails&projectType=7&projectId=1041439
Not sure what this all means really. Runs well enough for me games.
D
danger
Guest
- Thread starter
- #77
Originally posted by Wilier
Guess Im just better than you
You asked for it dude! :kissit:
W
Wilier
Guest
- Thread starter
- #78
Im better than you and Ive not got a yellow arse.
D
danger
Guest
- Thread starter
- #79
Gently rubs his DSL router as he max's his bandwidth downloading backups of his DVD collection Sorry what connection are YOU on again?
hehehe have you OC'd any of your hardware... just wondering
Sorry what connection are YOU on again? hehehe have you OC'd any of your hardware... just wondering
B
Big G
Guest
- Thread starter
- #80
I've updated my spec and get the following:
Athlon 2400+ (2 GHz) at 2700+ (2.15 GHz).
Geforce4 Ti4400 at Ti4600 speeds (300 MHz core clock, 650 MHz mem clock)
ASus A7V-266 with 512 meg PC2100 RAM
Detonators 41.09
10708 - 3DMark2001 SE (default, 1024*768*32, no FSAA)
I thought i'd get more than that - i was looking at getting 12000 odd? Is my result correct for the spec?
Gaz
Athlon 2400+ (2 GHz) at 2700+ (2.15 GHz).
Geforce4 Ti4400 at Ti4600 speeds (300 MHz core clock, 650 MHz mem clock)
ASus A7V-266 with 512 meg PC2100 RAM
Detonators 41.09
10708 - 3DMark2001 SE (default, 1024*768*32, no FSAA)
I thought i'd get more than that - i was looking at getting 12000 odd? Is my result correct for the spec?
Gaz
W
Wilier
Guest
- Thread starter
- #81
I should have thought you would get more than that BG, I get 10050 with XP2000 ti4200, but 512 2700 ddr.
Danger, my cpu is oc'd to 1.79mhz. Thats putting the fsb upto 143 and the vcore at 1.8.
Danger, my cpu is oc'd to 1.79mhz. Thats putting the fsb upto 143 and the vcore at 1.8.
B
Big G
Guest
- Thread starter
- #82
hmm,
My thoughts exactly Willier - i suspected that even though i'm at 2700+ speeds, it's only a 266 FSB (268 to be precise) and the mobo isn't exactly new.
Gaz
My thoughts exactly Willier - i suspected that even though i'm at 2700+ speeds, it's only a 266 FSB (268 to be precise) and the mobo isn't exactly new.
Gaz
W
WPKenny
Guest
- Thread starter
- #83
I had a look into this whole FSB/memory issue and it seems that the spped of the memory makes no difference when you get passed 266 fsb if you're using an Athlon XP at 266.
the Athlon can only give about 2 gigs of memory bandwidth so you can have memory running at 400mhz and it will make little or no difference to your 266 mhz system.
That's why there's the hype over the 333 fsb athlon XP's coming out cos they can use PC2700 memory. Any more is overkill TBH.
If you're over clocking the FSB on your chip then the faster memory may help but it's really not worth going any faster with an Athlon.
The p4's rule in that respect cos they've got mem bandwidth to burn.
I bought a stick of 512 mb PC2700 memory for two reasons....
When I get a 333fsb chip it will be running optimally and when I upgrade the memory it will then be able to do dual DDR at the optimal speed. Simple really.
I hope that made sense!!
the Athlon can only give about 2 gigs of memory bandwidth so you can have memory running at 400mhz and it will make little or no difference to your 266 mhz system.
That's why there's the hype over the 333 fsb athlon XP's coming out cos they can use PC2700 memory. Any more is overkill TBH.
If you're over clocking the FSB on your chip then the faster memory may help but it's really not worth going any faster with an Athlon.
The p4's rule in that respect cos they've got mem bandwidth to burn.
I bought a stick of 512 mb PC2700 memory for two reasons....
When I get a 333fsb chip it will be running optimally and when I upgrade the memory it will then be able to do dual DDR at the optimal speed. Simple really.
I hope that made sense!!
B
Big G
Guest
- Thread starter
- #84
so what if what you say is true, why are my 3dmarks lower than i expect?
anyone have any suggestions? drivers? mobo?
Gaz
anyone have any suggestions? drivers? mobo?
Gaz
W
Wilier
Guest
- Thread starter
- #85
nope.
S
Sawtooth
Guest
- Thread starter
- #86
Might explain my score on 3D MArks then as I have a 333 FSB, 2700 memory and an athlon XP thoroughbred cpu. Ta
W
WPKenny
Guest
- Thread starter
- #87
Big G,
I noticed that my 3dmark scores had dropped a little over time with installing crap going on in the back ground etc. I installed the latest dets and tweaked things a little and my scores are now in excess of 12000 on an Athlon 2400+ XP and a Ti4600 with PC2700 memory (running at 166 but of course the CPU can't facilitate this bandwidth cos it's only running at 133/266)
I noticed that my 3dmark scores had dropped a little over time with installing crap going on in the back ground etc. I installed the latest dets and tweaked things a little and my scores are now in excess of 12000 on an Athlon 2400+ XP and a Ti4600 with PC2700 memory (running at 166 but of course the CPU can't facilitate this bandwidth cos it's only running at 133/266)