Dard
Part of the furniture
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2005
- Messages
- 381
http://www.camelotherald.com/more/2895.shtml
or did i read it wrong coz its late .. or early or whatever
or did i read it wrong coz its late .. or early or whatever
Aiteal said:I don't think it means any more BD love
That is very big news for ments tbh, it's the first ever offical acknowledgement I ever remember seeing in 4yrs that anything needs fixing about the class. Looks good for 1.88 imo.Our goal was to change the class to have at least two, and hopefully three wholly viable spec lines, instead of one overly dominant spec line. This thought process will eventually be applied to every class with a severely lacking spell line (I’m looking at YOU Mentalism Mentalists)
Maeloch said:That is very big news for ments tbh, it's the first ever offical acknowledgement I ever remember seeing in 4yrs that anything needs fixing about the class. Looks good for 1.88 imo.
Commandment said:sorc doesnt need love.. but id sell my granny for some minstrel love.. or better yet statueds virginity to the highest bidder :O
Boni said:Imo mentalism is the poorest specline ever in any class in any realm (certainly in hib), deficiencies in other classes really arent in the same league. Bring on the menta menta love.
Maeloch said:That is very big news for ments tbh, it's the first ever offical acknowledgement I ever remember seeing in 4yrs that anything needs fixing about the class. Looks good for 1.88 imo.
Kami said:I noticed last night that BD pets have the same LOS issues as Shrooms, was being shot for 100 by a few BD archers near a keep even though they were inside it and I was standing by the way well and truely out of LOS
Nice to see when Mythic cock something up they do it with some sense of reliability!
RS|Phil said:SM summon line is the most poinltess tbh, when you take it from the point of view that you're not meant to solo farm every toa mob that is