your friday... wtf?!

[AngelHeal]

www.dumpert.nl - Uw Vrijdag WTF!!1?


haha this is great

 

[old.Tohtori]

Hi, haha, HIHAHAHAHA!!! :lol:

Gotta love Lazytown especialyl since veryone wants to tap that

 

[Urgluf]

dumpert.. what a surprise

 

[adoNix]

lil john is awsome! haha

 

[kirennia]

Great

Metallica/Britney Spears - So Fucking Crazy is better though

 

[old.Tohtori]

By the way, while browsing for lazy town songs:

I know that ain't legal, but damn...children show?!

 

[Huntingtons]

looks fake to me. I thought you would be able to spot it?

 

[old.Tohtori]

looks fake to me. I thought you would be able to spot it?

Would if it was.

Seems legit with comparing etc, ohwell, if it's not real...who cares

 

[Huntingtons]

oh but it is.

Also shes Lesbian.

 

[old.Tohtori]

oh but it is.

Also shes Lesbian.

"Oh but it is" isn't really convincing.

Where do you base this?

 

[Huntingtons]

her face, looks to me like it was cut out of a picture. abit too big to be 1/8th of the body (which a head normally is). No light on her nose which there would be considering the light on the shirt.

And why on earth would a 16 year old pose like that? (she was 14-16 around the shows run-time)

 

[old.Tohtori]

her face, looks to me like it was cut out of a picture. abit too big to be 1/8th of the body (which a head normally is). No light on her nose which there would be considering the light on the shirt.

And why on earth would a 16 year old pose like that? (she was 14-16 around the shows run-time)

Look around. The freckle on arm, the size of head, all matches i believe. If ou take the wig off, it's quite normal.

The image is shopped, but the basic lighting and shadows match.

If it's a switch-head, it's a damned good one and as such, i doubt anyone would stick a "too big" head on a body and then match up lights, shadows and other details to that extent.

Why she's posing is why i posted :lol:

 

[Imgormiel]

slightly funny

 

[Urgluf]

 

[Huntingtons]

Pedobear approves. so its all ok. I still stand by my comment that its a shop

and her tits arent that big.

 

[Edmond]

So wrong, on so many levels, first pic has got to be PS, there is no way they would let a publicity shot like that for a kids show be published

 

[old.Tohtori]

So wrong, on so many levels, first pic has got to be PS, there is no way they would let a publicity shot like that for a kids show be published

I'm thinking more of an out of context thing.

I simply can't find any shopping proof there, which, is usually there.

If it really is a shop, it's a damn good shop.

 

[Huntingtons]

i dont know why you think that. when i saw it i instantly thought it was a shop. It looks like the head is plastered on.

 

[old.Tohtori]

i dont know why you think that. when i saw it i instantly thought it was a shop. It looks like the head is plastered on.

Might be 'cause i look at things differently. Also because i do a fair share of very good shops myself.

For the quality, the lack of quality is inconsistent.

It's like..hmm...well...mona lisa having a penis in her skirt.

 

[Huntingtons]

but the internet also claims it to be a shop.

Internetz 1 - Tohtori 0

haha!

 

[old.Tohtori]

but the internet also claims it to be a shop.

Internetz 1 - Tohtori 0

haha!

Another post with lack of content.

"Huntingtons is a fake because internet says so!", doesn't make it true.

Where's the proof? Even links would do. And some links that show some proof.

 

[Huntingtons]

want proof? go find it. My eyes is my proof.

 

[old.Tohtori]

want proof? go find it. My eyes is my proof.

I'm fine in you believing whatever you wish, some other forum guy going "fakez!" or some such basic schoolyard tomfoolery. But if you insist on "challenging" me, present proof or leave me be.

 

[Huntingtons]

i like to have the last word.

 

[megadave]

Pedobear approves. so its all ok. I still stand by my comment that its a shop

and her tits arent that big.

that is brilliant.

 

[Aoami]

it's a shoop.

I can tell by the pixels and having seen a lot of shoops in my time.

 

[Dukat]

How to tell its fake for those of you who're really interested (yes I am bored)

A: The light here clearly shows that on the head there is a light pointed directly at her from above, where as the body clearly has a light pointed at it from an angle.

How do I know there arent just two lights? well:

B: this part of the hair doesnt show the sort of light that is being reflected from the body, also the shadows between the hair and the face should be deeper if there was strong lighting from the side as shown on the body, also, the left cheek should be brighter than the right cheek because it would be catching the stronger light from the side.

C: shadows on the chin are consistant with a strong light from the front and above, no evidence at all of the stronger light from the side, infact there are shadows where the side of her chin should be catching the light.


Aside from all of that, her head is too big, the colour temperature is wrong and its pixelated far too much to be a part of the original photo


EDIT: Oh and I forgot to say OMG so wrong, SO VERY WRONG

 

[old.Tohtori]

Dukat, the head isn't too big, remove the wig and you'll see. Or, compare other pictures of her body structure etc.

The light on the chin and upper body also match. Also do the shadows cast to the right arm/shoulder from the wig.

Wig is probably plastic, so explains rather much of the way it reflects light.

Two light sources? There's actually three; forward(balance light)/up(another balance light) and side(main lightsource)

The grain is consistent.

The shot is weird, and there's some light balance etc shopping, and the picture is bad quality, but the head seems legit.

 

[Amanita]

Well, she's 17 now so it might be her body but I can't see any TV studio getting a picture like that taken of a kids' show character.

 

[old.Tohtori]

Well, she's 17 now so it might be her body but I can't see any TV studio getting a picture like that taken of a kids' show character.

Icelandic show if i remember correctly, not to mention, the show ain't that "child friendly" anyway :lol: