You know this.....right ?

[[e]]

You get more Realm Points if your enemys target dies before you "help"!

Im starting to think that this is not common knowledge as so many of you patriots choose to get 100-200 rps instead of 6xx-9xx. (600-900)

With more RPS you can buy better MoC, faster Purge and maybe even some aug.dex, nice % dmg or % crit chance on your Lifetaps. Imagine the WTF-DMG you can do to them lame stealthers, coming to your island, every 10 min outside Bled keep!

 

[Phule_Gubben]

Really?

 

[Aussie]

interesting theory you got there m8

 

[Dorin]

Shocking news these things are :eek2:

 

[Kagato]

I'd rather get less rps and save the life of a realm mate thankyou very much, especially if it stops one more stealther getting high realm rank killing easy targets.

 

[Raven]

surprised to hear that from you tbh kagato. personaly i let any true 1v1 stay like it is whoever the victor is.

 

[Jaem-]

Hmm if I read it correctly, [e] your saying you get more rp if you don't zerg or something?

If thats so then your prob wrong, as you don't die so often with the zerg allowing you to just roll in many small amount of rp.

Leave 1v1's alone, even if the alb dies, they lost, their problem, embarasing when I get albs "helping" me, cause it harms the solo reputation I try so hard for. Add freely on stealthzergers or to even numbers in small battles such as 2v1, 3v2 etc.

Keeping vaules means don't rank so high on lwrp as ya miss alot of kills that "helping" would have got. :<

 

[Gasoline]

One quick question:
[e] - who are you?
The fact that nobody knows your identity doesn't help any - for all I know, you could be a zergling Alb (just as an example, don't hold that against me! )

 

[Kalba]

this guy is class, gotta say it

 

[Bracken]

Keeping vaules means don't rank so high on lwrp as ya miss alot of kills that "helping" would have got. :<

Depends on your values. I'd rather see an enemy player die than let them beat a realm mate. Though if I do step in it will only be when it's absolutely necessary and will always be with the minimum amount needed (e.g. a single slam). Letting a realm mate die when you could prevent it is never an option in my book, and that's nothing to do with rps.

 

[Jaapi]

Depends on your values. I'd rather see an enemy player die than let them beat a realm mate. Though if I do step in it will only be when it's absolutely necessary and will always be with the minimum amount needed (e.g. a single slam). Letting a realm mate die when you could prevent it is never an option in my book, and that's nothing to do with rps.

So in other words, you are giving people realm points they haven't really done anything for?

 

[Powerslave]

and all the fish bite........

was a nice prank though

 

[Alithiel]

Letting a realm mate die when you could prevent it is never an option in my book

That depends who the realm mate is...

 

[Jaem-]

Depends on your values. I'd rather see an enemy player die than let them beat a realm mate. Though if I do step in it will only be when it's absolutely necessary and will always be with the minimum amount needed (e.g. a single slam). Letting a realm mate die when you could prevent it is never an option in my book, and that's nothing to do with rps.

Most would class that as adding, which isn't nice on a 1v1 fight, even if yuur realm member is losing.

 

[Mithradir]

When i find 1vs1 i dont add especially now that nf fucked up rvr. The only thing i do is to root if he tries to flee. I h8 it

 

[Matmardigan]

show them no mercy, for u shall receive none

 

[Asq]

So in other words, you are giving people realm points they haven't really done anything for?

More like keeping enemies from gaining rps and keeping realmmate from dying (if he/she's losing or seems to be). That would be a better interpretation of what you quoted.

 

[Bracken]

Most would class that as adding, which isn't nice on a 1v1 fight, even if yuur realm member is losing.

Most would class letting your realm mate die as not being nice either. So it depends which you value more.

 

[Bracken]

That depends who the realm mate is...

Oh I'm sure many would let me die

 

[Knolan]

Oh I'm sure many would let me die

i let you die.

so i can get the rp's from rezzing you again

 

[[e]]

Hmm if I read it correctly, [e] your saying you get more rp if you don't zerg or something?

If thats so then your prob wrong, as you don't die so often with the zerg allowing you to just roll in many small amount of rp.

Leave 1v1's alone, even if the alb dies, they lost, their problem, embarasing when I get albs "helping" me, cause it harms the solo reputation I try so hard for. Add freely on stealthzergers or to even numbers in small battles such as 2v1, 3v2 etc.

Keeping vaules means don't rank so high on lwrp as ya miss alot of kills that "helping" would have got. :<

I'm trying to be sarcastic and saying a few things with that post actually...

 

[Matmardigan]

bann [e] 4 1 week again

 

[WullieTheRed]

to coin a phrase, War is Hell. And thats how I see it, Im not out there after rps or nuthing, If I see a realm mate getting his ass kicked, there is no way Im gonna stand back and watch, of course I will help. But I suppose its what you look for in the game. Im a bit of a roleplayer, so in my mind, Im out there to nail albies and, if I have to , mids. You may say, ahh, but you're destroying a 1vs1 duel.... so ferking what? I think I can count in one hand the amount of 1vs1 duels I've been in where his mates didnt add on me. To coin another phrase, the first casualty of war; is innocence.

 

[Alithiel]

i let you die.

so i can get the rp's from rezzing you again

But that's when you're in his group, not when he's soloing, so it's different!

Subedai got most of his rp's by letting group members die so he could rez them...

 

[Knolan]

But that's when you're in his group, not when he's soloing, so it's different!

Subedai got most of his rp's by letting group members die so he could rez them...

i duo with brack when im bored. at least 1 of us must get rp's dont we

 

[Kagato]

surprised to hear that from you tbh kagato. personaly i let any true 1v1 stay like it is whoever the victor is.

especially if it stops one more stealther getting high realm rank killing easy targets.

Note the easy targets.

If the fight looks fair, i.e 2 tanks or 2 assassins, fair do's.

But im not going to sit around and watch a BD kill a helpless cleric trying to get to the docks to use a real example I got whined at for before.

 

[Jaapi]

More like keeping enemies from gaining rps and keeping realmmate from dying (if he/she's losing or seems to be). That would be a better interpretation of what you quoted.

Actually it's not. It's taking away the rp's the other guy worked for and earned, and giving it all to someone that would've lost the original fight.

Not surprised why the game is in such sad state, honor.

 

[Bracken]

So in other words, you are giving people realm points they haven't really done anything for?

Aye, that might happen from time to time.

Not surprised why the game is in such sad state, honor.

I know it might not be k00l but my order of priorities are 1. Realm mates 2. Fair fights 3. Rps.

Might not go down well on irc but that's how I play it, and in my book that has more honour than worrying about rps first

Besides, been added on too many times to have it any other way

 

[Lothandar]

Good evening.