I'm all for ID cards but no way for video survilliance.

The scene your all describing is a view of what it may be like.
Those most in power are most likely to become power-hungry.
If they can use survillance to catch terrorists - what's next? Criminals? Fine. Going onto private property? Hmm. Shagging your best friend's wife?
Things evolve more quickly than you expect - and whos to tell if this ends up the same.
My mum knows where I am, and could kill me. In fact, lots of people know where I am and could kill me if they wanted.
Thing is, nobody cares about me enough to want me dead - just like 99% of the population![]()
Location: Leeds
WATCH OUT NATH! THEY AER COMING FOR YOOOOOOOO![]()
Noo they're on to me! Only I completely foxed the government, cos I don't live in Leeds any more!!!
Mwahahahahahahh!!!
rofl, I can see it now - snipers on various rooftops in leeds scratching thier heads wondering how nath is managing to stay hidden.
Its funny how the Government has suggested that the Identity Cards Act 2006 will tackle a number of problems, such as terrorism, identity theft, illegal immigration, and benefit fraud. It has never explained how.
The identity register and ID cards are mostly irrelevant to these problems, but they will restrict freedom, privacy, and civil rights for everyone...
Don't allow fear to influence your common sence. Fear is not only a weapon, it is perhaps the most powerful weapon that can be used in politics. And Bush f.eks is brandishing this weapon like no other, using it without concern of the consequences.
1:Think about how 9/11 has affected you. Excample; 2:If you are on an airplane and you see a group of Arab-looking men, would you be at least nervous? 3:After getting off the plane hours later, would you not be even a little more willing to support racial profiling in screening passengers for security threats?
and im probably going to regret this but...
Joor, go talk to the families of people who died in the london bombings, ask THEM what THEY think.
Ignorance alert.
lol, cos you can really comment on something you have never experienced.
/clap
Ohh a dose of irony too. Aren't you a clever one.
Here's the thing - just because something bad happened to someone, doesn't mean they'll instantly be for ID Cards/surveillance.
Countless times have I read that someone has been murdered, & the family don't want revenge or a way to stop them but just peace and so on.
Again - your working on fear/vengance - the idea that by damaging people, you can get them to instantly oppose others. It doesn't work for everyone.
i didnt say that they would oppose it, but the view is different from the firing line, than from your living room chair
its just rather... sad, that some people are using words like "fear" and "police state" insinuating that somehow this is the first step to the armageddon. get a grip on your perspective.
It's sad that you can't argue your perspective without insulting/trying to put down others. I have no use argueing with people like that - its just a waste of time :/
It's sad that you can't argue your perspective without insulting/trying to put down others. I have no use argueing with people like that - its just a waste of time :/
Already did.. if you read it all.
Where is your citation for this? Why would your ID file contain information such as your sexual preference? This is something in your head, not in reality.Joor said:The card itself is not the real problem. The National Identity Register IS.
When we become a number on a government computer - Initially the file would contain very little (date of birth, current address…). But gradually (in the name of ‘preventing terrorism’ ‘stopping crime’ or ‘protecting children’) the file would contain or link to more and more personal information such as: your spending habits, your ethnicity, religion, sexual preferences, your political leanings, your health records, your criminal records..etc etc .
Joor said:So you are saying that if you are not a criminal then the government may use any surveillance and monitoring against you no matter how draconian and intrusive? All mail should be routinely opened, all telephone calls routinely recorded, cameras monitoring every movement you make?
Joor said:So you dont care about privacy and freedom?
Maybe you wont object to a government spy camera in every room of your house, including your bedroom, linked back to a police monitoring station?
How about some of you stop being ignorant retards? Are you putting it past the government to have a hidden agenda or something? It's ALL about control.