Wyleia

[maxgirth]

Originally posted by Trippy
I shall have to think twice before bothering to respond to any further posts.

Please keep posting Tripp,I look forward to your posts with relish.....I bet you understand all the small print on an insurance document don`t ya??.

Damn he`s good aint he?.

 

[Generic Poster]

That's a fine way to say you cannot face the real issues being discussed here, so, you will recycle comments from earlier posts and run away. And you have the nerve to call me predictable.

It's also amusing how you and others claim my facts, and perception of the events to be at fault, yet you consistently fail to show me otherwise. Just by saying something is wrong, does not make it so.

Naturally, you have completely avoided the subject of my post, preffering to drown yourself in a myriad of words. Do pay attention and at least attempt to excuse yourself from your dreadful comments.

Originally posted by Trippy
You quote me as saying that "nowhere did I laugh at the attempts.... to make a CG" and then highlight three gobbets where you suggest I was "patronising" as some kind of coup de grace? Of all the thousands of words I have posted in this thread, this was the greatest inconsistency you could find? These are the killer sentences that will make my entire argument flounder and subvert everything I have stated before? Pathetic.

This is exactly what I mean. You contradict yourself, in the same thread no less, and when brought to your attention, you dismiss it as a mere inconsistency. It takes a brave man to admit his error, but I would prefer to hear some answers from you.

The facts show you to be incompetent with a pen, and one who fails to take responsibility. Why should anyone believe you to be better on the battlefield?

Originally posted by Trippy
I note that you don't deny that the so-called organisers failed to "co-ordinate with the majority of people at Renaris". How on earth do you assess this to mean that my group were the ones who lacked "teamplay", rather than the other way round?

You really are the clueless one, aren't you. Ok, let's take a guess here.

~ You have two groups, one is in the process of setting up a cg and gathering their forces. The other is mindlessly 'zerging' the enemy and repeatedly failing.

The zergers think the former group are wasting their time, with this outrageous concept of communication. ~

Take a guess, who would you label as the co-operative teamplayers, and which one are you... I mean, which group would you fit in?

Originally posted by Trippy
You quote me as saying: "I don't think you can argue that the only alternative to joining a useless CG and flapping about outside the keep is to run to the Mids and suicide one by one."

You then claim this to be "idiotic". Shall we break the quotation down into chunks of a size manageable by you?
"I don't think you can argue that the only alternative to" suggests that I will following this phrase with two alternatives. I am contending that these two are not the only two possible alternatives, that there may be a spectrum of alternatives ranging between and around them.
"Joining a useless CG and flapping about outside the keep" is alternative one.
Deciding to "run to the Mids and suicide one by one" is alternative two.
Do you suggest that there is no other alternative in this situation? If you can conceive of any other alternative to alternative one (for argument's sake not joining the Cg and charging in and defeating the Mids) you must retract your claim that this comment is idiotic. I hope your next post will include this retraction.

Like most of your mindless tripe, this does not deserve a reply. But as you asked for a response, I will honour with that. Notice how I will not write 300 words to dodge the subject.

There are many alternatives, but by experience, one uses the most efficient methods. Do you eat bananas without removing the skin?

Do you take a keep without an organised force?

Get out of Emain, and do some real RvR.

Originally posted by Trippy
This siege *DID* display the effectiveness that this Cg had to move all of the potential mezz-breakers out of the way in advance of the successful charge. Unfortunately, there are no other visible benefits to this Cg, unless of course its members were able to have a nice chat.

So lost are you in your own glory, you feel the need to insult the backbone of the raid, once again. You truly are a pathetic child, when mummy stops feeding you and daddy sends you out to work, you will learn the importance of teamwork.


I would also like to hear T30's response on your views. Is this attitude acceptable within your guild?




The comment about Beno was directed at Wyleia, who claimed T30 were there. Not everything I post is for you.

Neither am I stalking you. At one point yesterday the number of Midgardian invaders could have been considered a threat. At such times, I will check on RvR capable guilds and take estimates of how many people can be gathered for a relic defence. Not that I expect a common-zerger like yourself, to understand the importance of organisation.

 

[old.ondor]

im the emperor of france!

http://www.lucidcafe.com/library/95aug/95auggifs/nap4.gif
http://www.ddg.com/LIS/InfoDesignF97/aim/nap1.gif

 

[Turamber]

I think everyone has had their say, and aired their feelings. We have now got to the point where people are recycling their posts.

So, at my guildmasters request, I will lock this thread ... well, as soon as I can find the right button. Tsk, tsk, dumb tanks...