why oh why oh why

Blow

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
485
We took berk back, then we made 28 rams to try to take all towers in midland without taking a keep. But a few mids was keep taking the towers back, so we failed making 28 red towers. Then we took blendrake just because we had some time left before we had to log, and to give us more time so mids would take longer to retake blendrake and berkstead. But as it seems we still hold blendrake.
 

vavires

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
2,384
Its not about IRVR , its about doingit all during the night, get a clue when u read. U took or at least tried to took every tower with 0 to a few defenders. Thats what is lame, and u have done it 3 times in the last couple of days. Just because ure skilledless asses cant take berk back during a defence of mids
 

Labbe

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
304
Blow said:
We took berk back, then we made 28 rams to try to take all towers in midland without taking a keep. But a few mids was keep taking the towers back, so we failed making 28 red towers. Then we took blendrake just because we had some time left before we had to log, and to give us more time so mids would take longer to retake blendrake and berkstead. But as it seems we still hold blendrake.

Laugh!
 

Nate

FH is my second home
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Messages
7,454
Blow said:
We took berk back, then we made 28 rams to try to take all towers in midland without taking a keep. But a few mids was keep taking the towers back, so we failed making 28 red towers. Then we took blendrake just because we had some time left before we had to log, and to give us more time so mids would take longer to retake blendrake and berkstead. But as it seems we still hold blendrake.

oh, ok it all makes sense now....custlodia done it....never woulda guessed, and u say you had to take the keep? because "a few mids was keep taking the towers back"? i totally see your point ;)

Sorin said:
eat the truth you mids!!

tastes the same as custodia did this time last year ;o
 

auroria

Banned
Joined
Mar 3, 2006
Messages
892
gohan said:
albs WHY??

u cancel iRvR in HW that sux.....

but then u set it up in jamtland fair enought


so WHY take the tower for port to glen and CLAIM it??? whats the point...... no 1 is gonna run to you, grats u have a keep but its sitting thier doing FA,
fucking dodgy alb logic
cause gohan is a stupid biatch!
 

Blow

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
485
Nate said:
oh, ok it all makes sense now....custlodia done it....never woulda guessed, and u say you had to take the keep? because "a few mids was keep taking the towers back"? i totally see your point ;)



tastes the same as custodia did this time last year ;o


Read bit better, we took the keep cause we had time left. before that line i say we failed to take 28 towers, never said that we had to take it.


And vavires can you please give me a week by week schedule at what times we can take towers, keeps, kill mids, kill hibs, cause i really thought that a skilled person like you would not mind at what times that whould happen. But thats my skillless thoughts so who give a ....
 

Sorin

Banned
Joined
May 23, 2005
Messages
950
vavires said:
Its not about IRVR , its about doingit all during the night, get a clue when u read. U took or at least tried to took every tower with 0 to a few defenders. Thats what is lame, and u have done it 3 times in the last couple of days. Just because ure skilledless asses cant take berk back during a defence of mids


so?
you think the game will complete die out cuz we do this?
 

Nailez

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Messages
230
ummm whining about killing irvr ? the only reason we did what we did was because mids took berks while we had irvr in hib, did mid try take bolg in hib no they decided to takes berks and try irvr in alb and you call us stupid ?

irvr in 1 realm with all 3 realms present is better than trying to open a new irvr in another realm is it not? i see no point in opening your trap tbh gohan go back to the battlegrounds where you can extend you e-peen more cuz tbh here you talk aload of bollox.

/Member of Custodia and proud of it
 

gohan

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jul 24, 2004
Messages
6,338
Nailez said:
i see no point in opening your trap tbh gohan go back to the battlegrounds where you can extend you e-peen more cuz tbh here you talk aload of bollox.

/Member of Custodia and proud of it
go back the the battle grounds? HAHAHAHA i play thier like once every few weeks for a bit of fun....... ive palyed the game for 4 years an only recently even started playing thid atall so stfu an get a clue......
u may notice that unlike you, my "super leet thid toon that gets my E-peen going" isnt even in my signiture .... cos its thid... it means sweet FA but u be proud of ur bane of midgaurd/hibernia leachor tic go-on u deserve it give urslef a big clap ....
 

Kagato

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
3,777
gohan said:
albs WHY??

u cancel iRvR in HW that sux.....

but then u set it up in jamtland fair enought


so WHY take the tower for port to glen and CLAIM it??? whats the point...... no 1 is gonna run to you, grats u have a keep but its sitting thier doing FA,
fucking dodgy alb logic

This is rich coming from the same realm that attacked berkstead when hibs and albs had already set up Irvr in emain and left bolg wide open for you.

Maybe try using some logic yourselves first before you criticise albion who have already made it clear they don't want irvr in hw.
 

gohan

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Jul 24, 2004
Messages
6,338
Kagato said:
This is rich coming from the same realm that attacked berkstead when hibs and albs had already set up Irvr in emain and left bolg wide open for you.

Maybe try using some logic yourselves first before you criticise albion who have already made it clear they don't want irvr in hw.
im not speaking for midgard ... im speaking for me..... i agree mids do the same as do hib cos thier so many spastics tht play this game ..... but when i got on today it was alb that set up iRvR an then cut port to said iRvR, im hardly gonna have a go at mids for that am i??
 

Nate

FH is my second home
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Messages
7,454
Nailez said:
ummm whining about killing irvr ? the only reason we did what we did was because mids took berks while we had irvr in hib, did mid try take bolg in hib no they decided to takes berks and try irvr in alb and you call us stupid ?

irvr in 1 realm with all 3 realms present is better than trying to open a new irvr in another realm is it not? i see no point in opening your trap tbh gohan go back to the battlegrounds where you can extend you e-peen more cuz tbh here you talk aload of bollox.

/Member of Custodia and proud of it


so why then did you take crim at 5am or whatever? did the hibs sneeze in ur general direction? i guess taking berkstead keep primetime must be really lame because you early morning'd for your irvr...as usual.
 

Tesla Monkor

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 1, 2004
Messages
1,452
Nailez said:
ummm whining about killing irvr ? the only reason we did what we did was because mids took berks while we had irvr in hib, did mid try take bolg in hib no they decided to takes berks and try irvr in alb and you call us stupid ?

irvr in 1 realm with all 3 realms present is better than trying to open a new irvr in another realm is it not? i see no point in opening your trap tbh gohan go back to the battlegrounds where you can extend you e-peen more cuz tbh here you talk aload of bollox.

/Member of Custodia and proud of it

The answer is easy.

Bolg is a shit keep to have. Same reason Erasleigh is a shit keep to have, as are the remote coastal Mid keeps. Three keeps in one frontier do not equal iRVR - not when one is so far away that it's undoable for anyone anyone but FGs to range from it and survive.

Berkstead is infinitely more preferrable over Bolg, for anyone who isn't running in a FG. Besides, it would have been just as easy for the hibs to take Erasleight and have the three-way in Albion, but you don't see them rushing to take the coastal/swamp keep.

It's all a matter of perspective.
 

Kagato

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
3,777
Tesla Monkor said:
The answer is easy.

Bolg is a shit keep to have. Same reason Erasleigh is a shit keep to have, as are the remote coastal Mid keeps. Three keeps in one frontier do not equal iRVR - not when one is so far away that it's undoable for anyone anyone but FGs to range from it and survive.

Berkstead is infinitely more preferrable over Bolg, for anyone who isn't running in a FG. Besides, it would have been just as easy for the hibs to take Erasleight and have the three-way in Albion, but you don't see them rushing to take the coastal/swamp keep.

It's all a matter of perspective.

The differance is we already had Irvr set up in emain, we only needed mids to do 1 siege and we had a 3 way rather then 2 sieges to set up in hw again.

And bolg is not near as bad as eras, at eras you have to cross the entire widest part of the swamp to reach mainland.
At bolg you only have the tiny little stream of swamp which is actually small enough to hop over without even breaking stride and your on mainland and a stones throw from DC.
 

elbeek

Part of the furniture
Joined
Jan 9, 2004
Messages
2,144
vavires said:
Its not about IRVR , its about doingit all during the night, get a clue when u read. U took or at least tried to took every tower with 0 to a few defenders. Thats what is lame, and u have done it 3 times in the last couple of days. Just because ure skilledless asses cant take berk back during a defence of mids

Your butchery of English is fucking sad tbtfh.
 

kivik

Part of the furniture
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
2,623
elbeek said:
Your butchery of English is fucking sad tbtfh.

Your obsession to always take on spelling insults is just as sad.

Oh and what's tbtfh?
 

elbeek

Part of the furniture
Joined
Jan 9, 2004
Messages
2,144
kivik said:
Your obsession to always take on spelling insults is just as sad.

Oh and what's tbtfh?

To Be Totally Fucking Honest.

Didn't think it would be long before you came and infested this post btw. (By The Way).:puke:
 

Puppet

Part of the furniture
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
3,231
Kagato said:
The differance is we already had Irvr set up in emain, we only needed mids to do 1 siege and we had a 3 way rather then 2 sieges to set up in hw again.

And bolg is not near as bad as eras, at eras you have to cross the entire widest part of the swamp to reach mainland.
At bolg you only have the tiny little stream of swamp which is actually small enough to hop over without even breaking stride and your on mainland and a stones throw from DC.

Very true. Also, Bolg - DC is great for solo'ers aswell, you can have fights from basically the bloodletters 3K units away from Bolg, to the goborchends (halfway) and the valley near the East bridge of DC. Its nicely spread-out, much better then the Crim - DC, Beno - Berk areas which is just 1 big zergfest.

Spread out iRvR >>>>>>> tower-bridge-camping in my eyes, for both FG's and soloers. If there's anything which is shite its the constand Mid_Berk, Alb_Beno crap which does nothing but turn into a caster-zergfest.

Personally Eras - Beno would be great if the Alb 'soloers' would leave their bridge for once. Unfortunaly 90% doesnt.
 

Gungo

One of Freddy's beloved
Joined
Jun 30, 2004
Messages
590
Puppet said:
Personally Eras - Beno would be great if the Alb 'soloers' would leave their bridge for once. Unfortunaly 90% doesnt.

Slight contradiction there, surely they would leave the bridge hardly soloers if they all gathered on one bridge.
 

Nailez

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Messages
230
Nate said:
so why then did you take crim at 5am or whatever? did the hibs sneeze in ur general direction? i guess taking berkstead keep primetime must be really lame because you early morning'd for your irvr...as usual.


umm since when did custodia take crim @ 5am we been loving dem middiz more atm tbh
 

Notirt

One of Freddy's beloved
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
279
vavires said:
Its not about IRVR , its about doingit all during the night, get a clue when u read. U took or at least tried to took every tower with 0 to a few defenders. Thats what is lame, and u have done it 3 times in the last couple of days. Just because ure skilledless asses cant take berk back during a defence of mids

And how many times hasnt Mid taken Alb keep at mornings with 3-4 defenders the last couple of weeks ?
I cant understand why Mids whine all the time when u doing the same thing against Albs ?

I mean 5am or 8am whats the difference ? there´s hardly any defenders online at any of thoose times.

But i guess u Mids deserve some credit for the few times u taken Berk at a decent time tough
 

Puppet

Part of the furniture
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
3,231
Gungo said:
Slight contradiction there, surely they would leave the bridge hardly soloers if they all gathered on one bridge.

What you mean? Did you miss the 'soloers' part between brackets ?
 

islef

Loyal Freddie
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
373
Just gonna say what i think here. This is for the albs involved in the stuff this morning not the total albion population.

By all means setup irvr i mid for all i care, the thing that piss me off and made me start a bg with the sole purpose of scrweing up you r port this morning is the fact, that after a very short time of insta port mid frontier starts to turn red.
I could not care less if you wanna irvr in mid but it piss me of when i cant port anywhere, and even the slightest risk of the usual lamer twats starting to go for the relics at 9 in the morning annoy me.

So my tip would be: If this was about setting up irvr in mid, LEAVE the other ports alone. Fine if someone wanna take 1 twr or something, but when you take 6 more twrs expect to get kicked back to alb.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom