I think you both missed the point, our carrier groups lack the firepower to properly protect the carriers. That isn't fit for purpose, it is understrength.
Inadequate to protect carriers from what though?
I agree, if we were in anything approaching a conventional war with a country like China then we could be considered understength. However, we're not and probably never will be called on to engage a Navy of that size, especially not alone.
At the moment I would argue that they're fit for purpose because there is very little in the way of a conventional threat to protect our carriers from.
I guess I can see what you're saying though, and while I may not agree completely, I can understand your point![]()
Air attack, sub attack mostly but a direct attack with destoyers/cruisers as well. 3 carriers and 6 destroyers does not add up and that is all we are going to be left with. From a little bit of reading this evening it is one of the lowest if not the lowest carrier to destroyer ratio for any navy in the world. Also it seems our carriers don't have adequate air protection either, can't find the reference at the moment but it seems we will have to shoot incoming missles down because our aircraft don't have the range to go after the enemy aircraft who launch long range missiles.
Our armed forces are fit for the purpose of tagging along with the Americans so that it looks like they arent acting unilaterally and we can pretend to ourselves (nobody else is falling for it) that we are a world power still.
If we were trying to go it alone my money would be on the wet paper bag (they can be dangerous)...
And yet we handled Sierra Leone very neatly, unsupported, with such ease that hardly anyone actually knows what actually happened there - primarily because we didn't make a hash of it.
Yep we managed to rescue our own troops, who had been kidnapped by a drugged up gang after failing to tell the UN troops (who were also operating in Sierra Leone) that they were going on a little trip and give the gang a bit of a kicking. Which was a bit embarassing, though at least we didnt forget our men were there.
Puts a slightly different picture on the might of the British armed forces compared to being able to handle ourselves unless we come up against an enemy like China though
China....................................................................................................................................................................................... Dopped up gang of child soldiers
Page not wide enough to show how far apart those two enemies are.....
We ended a civil war that had been ongoing for 10 years in a country with a population over half the size of Somalia.
Somalia - Remember the state the US, with its shiny carriers and wonderfully big numbers that you seem to enjoy left that civil war? I'd like to think we did rather well, when you look at the picture in that light.
Having a bigger army than China isn't actually a prerequisite for being a 'world power'.
Being able to have an influcence in far parts of the world and being able to protect our interests in an effective, professional manner wherever they happen to be on the globe is far more important, imo.
Even in the Falklands War we would have been screwed if the US hadnt backed us and the Argentinians airforce hadnt hamstrung themselves and that was a long time ago.
You what? Are you on crack? Jesus titty fucking christ! Have you seen the state of the Argie airforce and navy?