C
Ch3tan
Guest
- Thread starter
- #31
Define hypocrasy......
- Status
Define hypocrasy......
S
Sir Frizz
Guest
- Thread starter
- #32
to be something that you arent, whats your point?
2on1, i like them odds
would you like meh to explain what i meant with these posts, you obviously seem to be getting the wrong idea...
2on1, i like them odds
would you like meh to explain what i meant with these posts, you obviously seem to be getting the wrong idea...
P
Perplex
Guest
- Thread starter
- #33
Aye chetan. The problem is arguing with intellectually stunted inferiors is so pointless and infuriating. In the face of overwhelming evidence, fact, and logic, they maintain their stance as "man U a big l00000ser!!11111111". The best things to do with such mentally incapacitated individuals is to simply ignore them.
On another note, his almost amusing hipocracy may be an attempt to 'appeal' to existing group members in the hope of conformity and cohesion (Belbin, 1968)
As someone once said: "Never argue with idiots, they drag you down to their low level, then beat you with experience"
On another note, his almost amusing hipocracy may be an attempt to 'appeal' to existing group members in the hope of conformity and cohesion (Belbin, 1968)
As someone once said: "Never argue with idiots, they drag you down to their low level, then beat you with experience"
P
Perplex
Guest
- Thread starter
- #34
He probably didn't understand most of that. Let me place in terms you may understand:
"U Big Gay!111 THICK L00SER!!111111111 0MG U SU(K1NG UP!1111"
(Thanks to nath for the translation)
"U Big Gay!111 THICK L00SER!!111111111 0MG U SU(K1NG UP!1111"
(Thanks to nath for the translation)
S
Sir Frizz
Guest
- Thread starter
- #35
you must be the idiot cos' you started the argument in the first place, and i dont recall calling ANYONE a loser, enlighten me
S
Sir Frizz
Guest
- Thread starter
- #36
ok then, i dont want to end up like glynners so you can prove me as being a rascist, i dont want another huge quoting thing like you did to him.
C
Ch3tan
Guest
- Thread starter
- #37
Im not going to do a big quoting thing, but if you cant see yourself thats a racsist attitude their really is no helping u.
I dont belive in putting anyone on a ignore list in forums, if I did after that comment in the refugees thread you would be on it.
Instead I am just not going to talk to u, so bye.
YOu'd probably not see that as a big loss, especially seeing as i'm Indian.
parting shot? me? never.
I dont belive in putting anyone on a ignore list in forums, if I did after that comment in the refugees thread you would be on it.
Instead I am just not going to talk to u, so bye.
YOu'd probably not see that as a big loss, especially seeing as i'm Indian.
parting shot? me? never.
S
Sir Frizz
Guest
- Thread starter
- #38
would it make you happier if i deleted the post and kept my "rascist" remarks to myself then?
O
old.D R E ad
Guest
- Thread starter
- #39
I want to share with you a few of the tentative conclusions I've reached regarding The-frizz's allegations. And I stress the word "tentative," because the subject of what motivates The-frizz is tricky and complex. I assume you already know that The-frizz is our worst nightmare, but I have something more important to tell you.
Might I suggest that he search for a hobby? It seems The-frizz has entirely too much time on his hands, given how often he tries to guarantee the destruction of anything that looks like a vital community. What we have been imparting to him -- or what he has been eliciting from us -- is a half-submerged, barely intended logic, contaminated by wishes and tendencies we prefer not to acknowledge. An ancient Greek once wrote something to the effect of, "It must be stated quite categorically that it is not too far-fetched to claim that his ignorant attempts to debunk myths often lead to the perpetuation of them." Today, the same dictum applies, just as clearly as when it was first written over two thousand years ago. When you get right down to it, if we let The-frizz procure explosive devices, gasoline, and detonators for use in an upcoming campaign of terror, civilization itself will fall. So let him call me dodgy. I call him uncivilized. I predict that one of these days, people will generally agree that he exhibits bad sportsmanship. This is a prediction that will not be true in all cases, but it is expected to become more common as time passes.
I have long been under the impression that permitting antisocial twerps to eliminate those law-enforcement officers who constitute the vital protective bulwark in the fragile balance between anarchy and tyranny is tantamount to suicide. I mean, think about it. Just don't expect consistency from a man who is totally and indeed crafty. Sure, some of The-frizz's reports are valid, but that's not the point. Although The-frizz wants to suck up to morally questionable nymphomaniacs, if we fail to question authority, then we have no one to blame but ourselves. He doesn't use words for communication or for exchanging information. He uses them to disarm, to hypnotize, to mislead, and to deceive.
I am certain that if I asked the next person I meet if he would want The-frizz to let unpatriotic, bloody-minded dorks run rampant through the streets, he would say no. Yet we all stand idly by while The-frizz claims that the best way to reduce cognitive dissonance and restore homeostasis to one's psyche is to extirpate the things I, for one, cherish. I wouldn't want to open new avenues for the expression of hate. I would, on the other hand, love to help you reflect and reexamine your views on The-frizz. But, hey, I'm already doing that with this letter. My general thesis is that his obstinate smear tactics can be quite educational. By studying them, students can observe firsthand the consequences of having a mind consumed with paranoia, fear, hatred, and ignorance. I'll talk a lot more about that later, but first let me finish my general thesis: His bons mots are rife with contradictions and difficulties; they're entirely nit-picky, meet no objective criteria, and are unsuited for a supposedly educated population. And as if that weren't enough, he is not as noisome or slimy as you might think. He's more so. Think of The-frizz's schemes as being the sum of two components: an impetuous component that consists of The-frizz's desire to make bribery legal and part of business as usual and a depraved component that consists of everything else. We are concerned primarily with the former.
It seems to me that, as others have stated long before me, "the underlying reasons and causes for The-frizz's capricious insinuations must be defined, examined, and resolved, or they'll never cease." The-frizz truly believes that he is omnipotent. I hope you realize that that's just a nettlesome pipe dream from a homophobic pipe, and that in the real world, if The-frizz can't be reasoned out of his prejudices, he must be laughed out of them. If The-frizz can't be argued out of his selfishness, he must be shamed out of it. After I make this world a better place in which to live, I know that everyone will come to the dismayed conclusion that I stated at the beginning of this discussion: I wonder if he really believes the things he says. He knows they're not true, doesn't he? I'll tell you what I think the answer is. I can't prove it, but if I'm correct, events soon will prove me right. I think that his incorrigible stances are in full flower, and their poisonous petals of hedonism are blooming all around us. In a broad-brush sense, a central fault line runs through each of The-frizz's expedients. Specifically, The-frizz should be in better control of his hormones. End of story. Actually, I should add that it is more than a purely historical question to ask, "How did his reign of terror start?" or even the more urgent question, "How might it end?". No, we must ask, "How can he impugn the patriotism of his opponents and then turn around and shed tears for those who got hurt as a result?" The most appealing theory has to do with the way that there is still hope for our society, real hope -- not the false sense of hope that comes from the mouths of tendentious spongers, but the hope that makes you eager to remove the misunderstanding that he has created in the minds of myriad people throughout the world. Given that the older The-frizz gets, the more ungrateful he becomes, isn't it fairly obvious that The-frizz should reserve his stereotypes and labels and remember to treat others with a bit more respect and equality? Let me end by appealing to our collective sense of humanity: It is singularly apt that there is no honor in The-frizz's perorations.
Might I suggest that he search for a hobby? It seems The-frizz has entirely too much time on his hands, given how often he tries to guarantee the destruction of anything that looks like a vital community. What we have been imparting to him -- or what he has been eliciting from us -- is a half-submerged, barely intended logic, contaminated by wishes and tendencies we prefer not to acknowledge. An ancient Greek once wrote something to the effect of, "It must be stated quite categorically that it is not too far-fetched to claim that his ignorant attempts to debunk myths often lead to the perpetuation of them." Today, the same dictum applies, just as clearly as when it was first written over two thousand years ago. When you get right down to it, if we let The-frizz procure explosive devices, gasoline, and detonators for use in an upcoming campaign of terror, civilization itself will fall. So let him call me dodgy. I call him uncivilized. I predict that one of these days, people will generally agree that he exhibits bad sportsmanship. This is a prediction that will not be true in all cases, but it is expected to become more common as time passes.
I have long been under the impression that permitting antisocial twerps to eliminate those law-enforcement officers who constitute the vital protective bulwark in the fragile balance between anarchy and tyranny is tantamount to suicide. I mean, think about it. Just don't expect consistency from a man who is totally and indeed crafty. Sure, some of The-frizz's reports are valid, but that's not the point. Although The-frizz wants to suck up to morally questionable nymphomaniacs, if we fail to question authority, then we have no one to blame but ourselves. He doesn't use words for communication or for exchanging information. He uses them to disarm, to hypnotize, to mislead, and to deceive.
I am certain that if I asked the next person I meet if he would want The-frizz to let unpatriotic, bloody-minded dorks run rampant through the streets, he would say no. Yet we all stand idly by while The-frizz claims that the best way to reduce cognitive dissonance and restore homeostasis to one's psyche is to extirpate the things I, for one, cherish. I wouldn't want to open new avenues for the expression of hate. I would, on the other hand, love to help you reflect and reexamine your views on The-frizz. But, hey, I'm already doing that with this letter. My general thesis is that his obstinate smear tactics can be quite educational. By studying them, students can observe firsthand the consequences of having a mind consumed with paranoia, fear, hatred, and ignorance. I'll talk a lot more about that later, but first let me finish my general thesis: His bons mots are rife with contradictions and difficulties; they're entirely nit-picky, meet no objective criteria, and are unsuited for a supposedly educated population. And as if that weren't enough, he is not as noisome or slimy as you might think. He's more so. Think of The-frizz's schemes as being the sum of two components: an impetuous component that consists of The-frizz's desire to make bribery legal and part of business as usual and a depraved component that consists of everything else. We are concerned primarily with the former.
It seems to me that, as others have stated long before me, "the underlying reasons and causes for The-frizz's capricious insinuations must be defined, examined, and resolved, or they'll never cease." The-frizz truly believes that he is omnipotent. I hope you realize that that's just a nettlesome pipe dream from a homophobic pipe, and that in the real world, if The-frizz can't be reasoned out of his prejudices, he must be laughed out of them. If The-frizz can't be argued out of his selfishness, he must be shamed out of it. After I make this world a better place in which to live, I know that everyone will come to the dismayed conclusion that I stated at the beginning of this discussion: I wonder if he really believes the things he says. He knows they're not true, doesn't he? I'll tell you what I think the answer is. I can't prove it, but if I'm correct, events soon will prove me right. I think that his incorrigible stances are in full flower, and their poisonous petals of hedonism are blooming all around us. In a broad-brush sense, a central fault line runs through each of The-frizz's expedients. Specifically, The-frizz should be in better control of his hormones. End of story. Actually, I should add that it is more than a purely historical question to ask, "How did his reign of terror start?" or even the more urgent question, "How might it end?". No, we must ask, "How can he impugn the patriotism of his opponents and then turn around and shed tears for those who got hurt as a result?" The most appealing theory has to do with the way that there is still hope for our society, real hope -- not the false sense of hope that comes from the mouths of tendentious spongers, but the hope that makes you eager to remove the misunderstanding that he has created in the minds of myriad people throughout the world. Given that the older The-frizz gets, the more ungrateful he becomes, isn't it fairly obvious that The-frizz should reserve his stereotypes and labels and remember to treat others with a bit more respect and equality? Let me end by appealing to our collective sense of humanity: It is singularly apt that there is no honor in The-frizz's perorations.
O
old.Jas
Guest
- Thread starter
- #40
Bloody hell
S
Sir Frizz
Guest
- Thread starter
- #41
is this supposed to make me look insane? or are you trying to make me take a look at myself and say"sort it out"?
C
Ch3tan
Guest
- Thread starter
- #42
Yes dread adn whose name was original their instead of the-firzzes?
Also your forgot to change the refrences to "in this letter" to "inthis forum post", but nice attempt.
Also your forgot to change the refrences to "in this letter" to "inthis forum post", but nice attempt.
O
old.D R E ad
Guest
- Thread starter
- #43
It has recently come to my attention that sometimes, what you don't know can hurt you. Wait! Before you dismiss me as lecherous, hear me out. As will be discussed in more detail later in this letter, I'm sticking out my neck a bit in talking about Ch3tan's outbursts. It's quite likely he will try to retaliate against me for my telling you that his crusades will have consequences -- very serious consequences. And we ought to begin doing something about that.
I want my life to count. I want to be part of something significant and lasting. I want to compare, contrast, and identify the connections among different sorts of morbid neopaganism.
I feel that writing this letter is like celestial navigation. Before directional instruments were invented, sailors navigated the seas by fixing their compass on the North Star. But after hearing about Ch3tan's sordid attempts to make widespread accusations and insinuations without having the facts to back them up, I was saddened. I was saddened that he has lowered himself to this level. No matter how bad you think Ch3tan's editorials are, I assure you that they are far, far worse than you think. I might be able to forgive Ch3tan, but only if he promises never again to create a crapulous, blasphemous world of guilt and shame. Still, we shouldn't jump to conclusions, even though it is a known fact that he wants to replace love and understanding with pharisaism and McCarthyism. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is Ch3tan's gossamer grasp of reality.
He hurts people wherever they may be, penthouse or poorhouse. Am I saying that the shameless credentialism in his expositions is not always explicit? Yes. That we have a life-or-death situation on our hands? Maybe. That words cannot convey the hurt and despair that I and so many others feel for those who were personally attacked by Ch3tan? Definitely.
As I remove the veil of ignorance I have lived behind, I find that he would have us believe that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. Yeah, right. That's a very important point; if he succeeds in his attempt to present a false image to the world by hiding unpleasant but vitally important realities about his shell games, it'll have to be over my dead body.
Ch3tan says he's not nutty, but he's unequivocally rude, and that's essentially the same thing. While I, not being one of the many surly scum of this world, am not attempting to argue openly in favor of any particular position, he constantly insists that obscurity, evasiveness, incomprehensibility, indirectness, and ambiguity are marks of depth and brilliance. But he contradicts himself when he says that feudalism is a noble goal. There is absolutely nothing these bad-tempered anthropophagi will not do to destroy their enemies. They will poke into the most secret family affairs and not rest until their truffle-searching instinct digs up some logorrheic incident that is calculated to finish off their unfortunate victim.
Ch3tan has spent untold hours trying to paralyze any serious or firm decision and thereby become responsible for the weak and half-hearted execution of even the most necessary measures. During that time, did it ever once occur to him that I have found, to my considerable surprise, that I'm oversimplifying things a little here? To rephrase that question, how can he be so hypocritical? To ask that question another way, does he realize he's more repugnant than most corrupt, inconsiderate pothouse drunks? I mean, he may add insult to injury right after he reads this letter. Let him. In a matter of days, I, not being one of the many patronizing, impudent turncoats of this world, will put to rest spineless and jealous solutions such as Ch3tan's. He will probably respond to this letter just like he responds to all criticism. He will put me down as "offensive" or "parasitic". That's his standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about him except the most fawning praise. While these incidents may seem minor, most people want to be nice; they want to be polite; they don't want to give offense. And because of this inherent politeness, they step aside and let Ch3tan burn our fair cities to the ground. His ruses are so exact in their scheme, so comprehensive in their scope, that deluded, lethargic fomenters of revolution have adopted and embraced them verbatim ac litteratim. I always catch hell whenever I say something like that, so let me assure you that if one could get a Ph.D. in Plagiarism, he would be the first in line to have one.
The fact that I must definitely add my voice to the chorus of those who begin a course of careful, planned, and coordinated action is particularly striking, since in order to solve the big problems with Ch3tan, we must first understand these problems, and to understand them, we must warn the public against those abominable spongers whose positive accomplishments are always practically nil, but whose conceit can scarcely be excelled. Though I am indubitably not a proponent of conflict, he says he's going to blend together nepotism and nativism in a train wreck of monumental proportions in the coming days. Good old Ch3tan. He just loves to open his mouth and let all kinds of things come out without listening to how vexatious they sound. Where are the solid statistics that prove that cultural tradition has never contributed a single thing to the advancement of knowledge or understanding? I've never seen any. Yet, if we let Ch3tan invade every private corner and force every thought into a disgusting mold, then greed, corruption, and jingoism will characterize the government. Oppressive measures will be directed against citizens. And lies and deceit will be the stock and trade of the media and educational institutions.
His true goal is to gag the innocent accused from protesting sectarianism-motivated prosecutions. All the statements that his lieutenants make to justify or downplay that goal are only apologetics; they do nothing to lift our nation from the quicksand of injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood. On the surface, it would seem merely that I am offended by the way Ch3tan talks down to me. But the truth is that Ch3tan's doctrines use a philosophical device of asking one question, answering a totally different question, and then applying that answer to the original question. For proof of this fact, I must point out that if Ch3tan wants to complain, he should have an argument. He shouldn't just throw out the word "piezocrystallization", for example, and expect us to be scared.
The homicidal smart alecks who collaborate with him should be spat upon -- or worse -- for their lack of integrity. I don't think anyone questions that. But did you know that he doesn't care one whit about how others might feel? Anyway, I hope I've made my point, which is that Ch3tan is crazier than a really crazy crazy thing.
I want my life to count. I want to be part of something significant and lasting. I want to compare, contrast, and identify the connections among different sorts of morbid neopaganism.
I feel that writing this letter is like celestial navigation. Before directional instruments were invented, sailors navigated the seas by fixing their compass on the North Star. But after hearing about Ch3tan's sordid attempts to make widespread accusations and insinuations without having the facts to back them up, I was saddened. I was saddened that he has lowered himself to this level. No matter how bad you think Ch3tan's editorials are, I assure you that they are far, far worse than you think. I might be able to forgive Ch3tan, but only if he promises never again to create a crapulous, blasphemous world of guilt and shame. Still, we shouldn't jump to conclusions, even though it is a known fact that he wants to replace love and understanding with pharisaism and McCarthyism. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is Ch3tan's gossamer grasp of reality.
He hurts people wherever they may be, penthouse or poorhouse. Am I saying that the shameless credentialism in his expositions is not always explicit? Yes. That we have a life-or-death situation on our hands? Maybe. That words cannot convey the hurt and despair that I and so many others feel for those who were personally attacked by Ch3tan? Definitely.
As I remove the veil of ignorance I have lived behind, I find that he would have us believe that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. Yeah, right. That's a very important point; if he succeeds in his attempt to present a false image to the world by hiding unpleasant but vitally important realities about his shell games, it'll have to be over my dead body.
Ch3tan says he's not nutty, but he's unequivocally rude, and that's essentially the same thing. While I, not being one of the many surly scum of this world, am not attempting to argue openly in favor of any particular position, he constantly insists that obscurity, evasiveness, incomprehensibility, indirectness, and ambiguity are marks of depth and brilliance. But he contradicts himself when he says that feudalism is a noble goal. There is absolutely nothing these bad-tempered anthropophagi will not do to destroy their enemies. They will poke into the most secret family affairs and not rest until their truffle-searching instinct digs up some logorrheic incident that is calculated to finish off their unfortunate victim.
Ch3tan has spent untold hours trying to paralyze any serious or firm decision and thereby become responsible for the weak and half-hearted execution of even the most necessary measures. During that time, did it ever once occur to him that I have found, to my considerable surprise, that I'm oversimplifying things a little here? To rephrase that question, how can he be so hypocritical? To ask that question another way, does he realize he's more repugnant than most corrupt, inconsiderate pothouse drunks? I mean, he may add insult to injury right after he reads this letter. Let him. In a matter of days, I, not being one of the many patronizing, impudent turncoats of this world, will put to rest spineless and jealous solutions such as Ch3tan's. He will probably respond to this letter just like he responds to all criticism. He will put me down as "offensive" or "parasitic". That's his standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about him except the most fawning praise. While these incidents may seem minor, most people want to be nice; they want to be polite; they don't want to give offense. And because of this inherent politeness, they step aside and let Ch3tan burn our fair cities to the ground. His ruses are so exact in their scheme, so comprehensive in their scope, that deluded, lethargic fomenters of revolution have adopted and embraced them verbatim ac litteratim. I always catch hell whenever I say something like that, so let me assure you that if one could get a Ph.D. in Plagiarism, he would be the first in line to have one.
The fact that I must definitely add my voice to the chorus of those who begin a course of careful, planned, and coordinated action is particularly striking, since in order to solve the big problems with Ch3tan, we must first understand these problems, and to understand them, we must warn the public against those abominable spongers whose positive accomplishments are always practically nil, but whose conceit can scarcely be excelled. Though I am indubitably not a proponent of conflict, he says he's going to blend together nepotism and nativism in a train wreck of monumental proportions in the coming days. Good old Ch3tan. He just loves to open his mouth and let all kinds of things come out without listening to how vexatious they sound. Where are the solid statistics that prove that cultural tradition has never contributed a single thing to the advancement of knowledge or understanding? I've never seen any. Yet, if we let Ch3tan invade every private corner and force every thought into a disgusting mold, then greed, corruption, and jingoism will characterize the government. Oppressive measures will be directed against citizens. And lies and deceit will be the stock and trade of the media and educational institutions.
His true goal is to gag the innocent accused from protesting sectarianism-motivated prosecutions. All the statements that his lieutenants make to justify or downplay that goal are only apologetics; they do nothing to lift our nation from the quicksand of injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood. On the surface, it would seem merely that I am offended by the way Ch3tan talks down to me. But the truth is that Ch3tan's doctrines use a philosophical device of asking one question, answering a totally different question, and then applying that answer to the original question. For proof of this fact, I must point out that if Ch3tan wants to complain, he should have an argument. He shouldn't just throw out the word "piezocrystallization", for example, and expect us to be scared.
The homicidal smart alecks who collaborate with him should be spat upon -- or worse -- for their lack of integrity. I don't think anyone questions that. But did you know that he doesn't care one whit about how others might feel? Anyway, I hope I've made my point, which is that Ch3tan is crazier than a really crazy crazy thing.
P
Perplex
Guest
- Thread starter
- #44
DREad, my already waivering opinion of you took a further nosedive. Shareholders have been informed and stock values looks set to plummet
B
bodhi
Guest
- Thread starter
- #45
You ain't fooling anyone fuckwit.
O
old.D R E ad
Guest
- Thread starter
- #46
I've tried to keep quiet, but I just can't hold it in any longer. I have to tell everyone that you can chalk up incidents such as the ones I've described to the ridiculous nature of Bodhi's prognoses. Let me preface my discussion by quickly reasserting a familiar theme of my previous letters: If it were up to Bodhi, schoolchildren would be taught reading, 'riting, and racism. He is swinging pretty hard on some slender evidence. Why do I tell you this? Because these days, no one else has the guts to. No amount of opinion or innuendo nor any string of unrelated words can change the fact that ruffianism is dangerous. Bodhi's ornery version of it is doubly so.
I repeat: Bodhi asserts that his orations are Right with a capital R. Most reasonable people, however, recognize such assertions as nothing more than baseless, if wishful, claims unsupported by concrete evidence. I won't mince my words: A central fault line runs through each of his rantings. Specifically, his victims have been speaking out for years. Unfortunately, their voices have long been silenced by the roar and thunder of Bodhi's allies, who loudly proclaim that the Eleventh Commandment is, "Thou shalt destroy our youths' ability to relax, reflect, study, and meditate". Regardless of those nasty proclamations, the truth is that it's quite easy for him to bombastically declaim my proposals. But when is Bodhi going to provide an alternative proposal of his own? Well, if I knew that, I'd be in Stockholm picking up my prize and a sizable check. When all is said and done, a person who wants to get ahead should try to understand the long-range consequences of his/her undertakings. Bodhi has never had that faculty. He always does what he wants to do at the moment and figures he'll be able to lie himself out of any problems that arise.
While there is inevitable overlap at the edges of political movements, it's warped for him to judge people based solely on hearsay. Or perhaps I should say, it's unsavory. Bodhi's allegations are based on two fundamental errors. They assume that there is something intellectually provocative in the tired rehashing of bloodthirsty stereotypes. And they promote the mistaken idea that we should avoid personal responsibility. Only the impartial and unimpassioned mind will even consider that Bodhi has a natural talent for complaining. He can find any aspect of life and whine about it for hours upon hours. He is too vindictive to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that I want to thank him for his canards. They give me an excellent opportunity to illustrate just how worthless Bodhi can be. If you want to clear up these muddied waters with some reality, then tell everyone you know the truth, that I'll tell you what we need to do about all the craziness he is mongering. We need to stop the Huns at the gate. Lastly, for those who read this letter, I hope you take it to heart and pass this message on to others.
I repeat: Bodhi asserts that his orations are Right with a capital R. Most reasonable people, however, recognize such assertions as nothing more than baseless, if wishful, claims unsupported by concrete evidence. I won't mince my words: A central fault line runs through each of his rantings. Specifically, his victims have been speaking out for years. Unfortunately, their voices have long been silenced by the roar and thunder of Bodhi's allies, who loudly proclaim that the Eleventh Commandment is, "Thou shalt destroy our youths' ability to relax, reflect, study, and meditate". Regardless of those nasty proclamations, the truth is that it's quite easy for him to bombastically declaim my proposals. But when is Bodhi going to provide an alternative proposal of his own? Well, if I knew that, I'd be in Stockholm picking up my prize and a sizable check. When all is said and done, a person who wants to get ahead should try to understand the long-range consequences of his/her undertakings. Bodhi has never had that faculty. He always does what he wants to do at the moment and figures he'll be able to lie himself out of any problems that arise.
While there is inevitable overlap at the edges of political movements, it's warped for him to judge people based solely on hearsay. Or perhaps I should say, it's unsavory. Bodhi's allegations are based on two fundamental errors. They assume that there is something intellectually provocative in the tired rehashing of bloodthirsty stereotypes. And they promote the mistaken idea that we should avoid personal responsibility. Only the impartial and unimpassioned mind will even consider that Bodhi has a natural talent for complaining. He can find any aspect of life and whine about it for hours upon hours. He is too vindictive to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that I want to thank him for his canards. They give me an excellent opportunity to illustrate just how worthless Bodhi can be. If you want to clear up these muddied waters with some reality, then tell everyone you know the truth, that I'll tell you what we need to do about all the craziness he is mongering. We need to stop the Huns at the gate. Lastly, for those who read this letter, I hope you take it to heart and pass this message on to others.
P
Perplex
Guest
- Thread starter
- #47
Moderator, delete this retards inane blatherings please. Half of it doesn't actually make any sense, but he's obviosuly too stupid to figure it out.
B
bodhi
Guest
- Thread starter
- #48
*sigh*
O
old.D R E ad
Guest
- Thread starter
- #49
While no statement I'm about to make should be construed as suggesting or recommending that any person commit an illegal act of any kind, you should realize that Perplex's opinions are part and parcel of a larger game plan to promote the sort of behavior that would have made the folks in Sodom and Gomorrah blush. But first, let me pose you a question: Is Perplex actually concerned about any of us, or does he just want to clear forests, strip the topsoil, and turn a natural paradise into a dust bowl through a self-induced drought? After reading this letter, you'll honestly find it's the latter. He is guilty of a shocking display of dishonesty and sophistry. But there's the rub; each rung on the ladder of authoritarianism is a crisis of some kind. Each crisis supplies an excuse for him to guarantee the destruction of anything that looks like a vital community. That is the standard process by which obtrusive flimflammers prevent me from sleeping soundly at night. Here's a specific example of the way in which Perplex has never been able to assimilate and accept the humane ideals, civilized aims, and social aspirations of his peers: He wants to feed blind hatred. If you're not part of the solution, then you're part of the problem. He is obviously trying to disparage and ridicule our traditional heroes and role models, and unless we act now, he'll doubtlessly succeed. Perplex's comrades are more determined than most insidious, vainglorious misers. Am I aware of how Perplex will react when he reads that last sentence? Yes. Do I care? No, because his tirades are destructive. They're morally destructive, socially destructive -- even intellectually destructive. And, as if that weren't enough, he is terrified that there might be an absolute reality outside himself, a reality that is what it is, regardless of his wishes, theories, hopes, daydreams, or decrees.
I'm sure Perplex wouldn't want me to eavesdrop on his secret conversations. So why does he want to detach individuals from traditional sources of strength and identity -- family, class, private associations? No, don't guess; this isn't audience participation day. I'll just tell you. But before I do, you should note that it's about time he stopped claiming his execrable threats were influenced by outside sources and just admitted he was wrong. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and, in many cases, it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it undeniably expresses how if he is going to exercise both subtlety and thoroughness in managing both the news and the entertainment that gets presented to us, then he should at least have the self-respect to remind himself of a few things: First, most acts of gangsterism are committed not by the worst kinds of stingy, quasi-dastardly carpetbaggers I've ever seen, but by Perplex's vassals in an attempt to combine, in a rare mixture, bestial cruelty and an inconceivable gift for lying. And second, Perplex is absolutely determined to believe that obscurity, evasiveness, incomprehensibility, indirectness, and ambiguity are marks of depth and brilliance, and he's not about to let facts or reason get in his way. Perplex is typical of brutish, disgraceful authoritarians in his wild invocations to the irrational, the magic, and the fantastic to dramatize his convictions. Even as I write those words, I can feel Perplex cringe. That's okay. Cringe. I don't care, because we must convince the government to clamp down hard on his memoirs. To do anything else, and I do mean anything else, is a complete waste of time.
If he feels ridiculed by all the attention my letters are bringing him, then that's just too darn bad. Perplex's arrogance has brought this upon himself. Perplex has recently been going around claiming that onanism is a noble goal. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to believe that junk. Might I suggest that he search for a hobby? It seems Perplex has entirely too much time on his hands, given how often he tries to advocate fatalistic acceptance of a laughable new world order. Some day, I want to build a true community of spirit and purpose based on mutual respect and caring. But you don't have to wait for that. What you can do now is talk to everyone you know about the things I've told you in this letter. Use every medium available to you. Use the Internet. Use your telephone. Use radio and newspapers. And whatever you do, never be afraid to speak out against the evil that is Perplex.
I'm sure Perplex wouldn't want me to eavesdrop on his secret conversations. So why does he want to detach individuals from traditional sources of strength and identity -- family, class, private associations? No, don't guess; this isn't audience participation day. I'll just tell you. But before I do, you should note that it's about time he stopped claiming his execrable threats were influenced by outside sources and just admitted he was wrong. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and, in many cases, it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it undeniably expresses how if he is going to exercise both subtlety and thoroughness in managing both the news and the entertainment that gets presented to us, then he should at least have the self-respect to remind himself of a few things: First, most acts of gangsterism are committed not by the worst kinds of stingy, quasi-dastardly carpetbaggers I've ever seen, but by Perplex's vassals in an attempt to combine, in a rare mixture, bestial cruelty and an inconceivable gift for lying. And second, Perplex is absolutely determined to believe that obscurity, evasiveness, incomprehensibility, indirectness, and ambiguity are marks of depth and brilliance, and he's not about to let facts or reason get in his way. Perplex is typical of brutish, disgraceful authoritarians in his wild invocations to the irrational, the magic, and the fantastic to dramatize his convictions. Even as I write those words, I can feel Perplex cringe. That's okay. Cringe. I don't care, because we must convince the government to clamp down hard on his memoirs. To do anything else, and I do mean anything else, is a complete waste of time.
If he feels ridiculed by all the attention my letters are bringing him, then that's just too darn bad. Perplex's arrogance has brought this upon himself. Perplex has recently been going around claiming that onanism is a noble goal. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to believe that junk. Might I suggest that he search for a hobby? It seems Perplex has entirely too much time on his hands, given how often he tries to advocate fatalistic acceptance of a laughable new world order. Some day, I want to build a true community of spirit and purpose based on mutual respect and caring. But you don't have to wait for that. What you can do now is talk to everyone you know about the things I've told you in this letter. Use every medium available to you. Use the Internet. Use your telephone. Use radio and newspapers. And whatever you do, never be afraid to speak out against the evil that is Perplex.
P
Perplex
Guest
- Thread starter
- #50
Typical NGUK retard. Jesus, why did you decide to come to us and not go somewhere else
N
nath
Guest
- Thread starter
- #51
anyone remember http://<name>.isgay.com ....
C
Ch3tan
Guest
- Thread starter
- #52
Dread is offensive and parasitic.
O
old.D R E ad
Guest
- Thread starter
- #53
Ahhh, you got me. How did you guess I did not write that? You are very clever.
Well done
Have a look at this;
http://www-csag.ucsd.edu/individual/pakin/complaint
Well done
Have a look at this;
http://www-csag.ucsd.edu/individual/pakin/complaint
P
Perplex
Guest
- Thread starter
- #54
Cos every half-wit has tried to palm those off as their own at some point or another? They are ancient
O
old.D R E ad
Guest
- Thread starter
- #55
The old ones are the best
M
Moving Target
Guest
- Thread starter
- #56
aah
Flame War!!
O
old.Kez
Guest
- Thread starter
- #57
Did mummy tell you that? It does explain why you're so thoroughly incapable of grasping anything.Originally posted by D R E ad
The old ones are the best
O
old.D R E ad
Guest
- Thread starter
- #58
My mother and father are dead thanks. Me and my brother were the only ones that survived it. But even if she was alive I have been living with my girlfriend for 4 years. So it could have been her that told me I guess
O
old.Kez
Guest
- Thread starter
- #59
Forgive me, but what does that have to do with anything? I never quoted a timeframe for her to have taught you it, and to be honest, I'd expect her to have told you when you were younger and 'under the wing' ... so the fact they are dead is an entirely moot point.
O
old.D R E ad
Guest
- Thread starter
- #60
Fuck you. Might be "moot" (gimp ) to you but its not to me. At the end of the day it was just a bit of sunday afternoon messing about and I doubt anyone really took it that seriously (I was'nt till you involved my family) and was just having a bit of a laff. I see you want to take this flame war to another level (and carrying it on in other unrelated threads). Well I don't. This thread was winding down anyway, your a bit late. Piss off.
) to you but its not to me. At the end of the day it was just a bit of sunday afternoon messing about and I doubt anyone really took it that seriously (I was'nt till you involved my family) and was just having a bit of a laff. I see you want to take this flame war to another level (and carrying it on in other unrelated threads). Well I don't. This thread was winding down anyway, your a bit late. Piss off.- Status