ur dissapointement is awaiting u

[seeph]

YUP check the Herald, TL reports are back


cant say im surprised ...

other words but same reply... working as intended,

thx for feedback....., (we w.ll do Sh.t w.th .t)

 

[Zoia]

All they did was say "tabled - need specifics" in a nicer way.

It's not as bad as last time though. There's a couple of nice things in there, but like always, they end up at the discussion-list(some have already been fixed though).
I just hope they start working on that list soon before it gets too long.

I liked this though(from the skald feedback):

Issue Description:
Six separate resist chants, which cannot be twisted, is a bit too much. Having this actually changed would be a great boon for the Skald class. In the previous TL reports this was mentioned, and each time I received a different response as to the status of this request.
Mythic Response:
This is a good point and is slated to be changed in an upcoming patch.

It's not even on the discussion list, it's maybe coming soon! \o/


They talked about giving zerkers some more potiosionals as well.
Taken from the zerker feedback thread on VN:

The 3 options I was giving for a side positional chain in LA are:
1) Change Doubler to a Side Positional
2) Change Scathing Blade to a Side Positional w/ ~0.65 GR with Decaying Rage as a Detaunt Followup. Increase the GR on Ravager to ~0.6 to compensate for the loss of damage in that chain.
3) Change Icy Brilliance to a Side Positional w/ 0.9 GR

Id prefer 2 or 3... and I personally like (2) best as it addresses both the RvR and PvE aspects of the class (i.e. aggro management while putting out heavy damage).

W

Not sure how much i like those 3 options, but it's something.

 

[orbin]

Not giving Berserkers a positional stun or snare is plain ignorant!



/Gashemi

 

[kivik]

Issue Description:
Weapon styles do not show style trails when thrusting hand to hand weapons are equipped. Would like to request these be added.

Mythic Response:
This is a bug and has been added to the list.

.

 

[Coldbeard]

As if Berserkers need love ? :s

 

[orbin]

Not dmg wise no but utility wise yes. We lack a good snare. As it is now we have to spec hammer to get that. Its a shame LA doesnt provide a positional one.



/Gashemi

 

[Imgormiel]

Frosty Gaze gimpeh on La evade chain, snares for 5 secs if you bother to use it, and it's quite nice too ^^ =)

 

[Dorin]

lower zerk dmg if they want utility styles tbh....

Or dont let em use banespike/vendo together oO

 

[Surprising Death]

lower zerk dmg if they want utility styles tbh....

Or dont let em use banespike/vendo together oO

fu

 

[Chronictank]

Issue Description:
Players would like to see a +to-hit bonus on the level 29 Hammer Style, Conquer. Style Left Axe Aurora Borealis Players feel the Cold DD Proc on Aurora Borealis isn’t appropriate for the Berserker class. -- Suggestions * Change to Absorb Debuff * Change to Heavy Bleed

Mythic Response:
There are no plans to make changes to Conquer at this time. We wanted to add some more flavor to Aurora Borealis and feel that the proc is doing just that. There are no plans to revisit the decision at this time.

:/

 

[Chronictank]

lower zerk dmg if they want utility styles tbh....

Or dont let em use banespike/vendo together oO

Zerker is designed for high dmg, as a result suffers from completely shite defence.
we have no positional stun, and we have to spec hammer just to get a positional snare.

Frosty Gaze gimpeh on La evade chain, snares for 5 secs if you bother to use it, and it's quite nice too ^^ =)

its a stun, play a zerker before you make silly comments like this,
you are almost never gona hit on a followup in toa

If anything frosty should be changed to have a high to-hit bonus

Funniest thing about thsi thread will be no merc/bm will complain about the current balance