It should not be possible to suicide by cop unless you present a danger to the cop's life.The rest was suicide by cop.
Even Bame 'leaders' are calling it bullshit.
Censoring old films and TV shows misses the point, say BAME leaders
Critics warn that ‘panic-erasing’ distracts from what really matters: employing more ethnic minorities on and off screenwww.theguardian.com
hearing that some rapper has now taken charge and has an armed militia, threatening businesses in the area to pay up for protection. You literally could not make this shit up!
Found any evidence of a criminal record yet? We all know you're scouring the internet as we speak.The Mail has got the bodycam footage.
He failed the breathalyser and was talking and joking, though drunk till they tried to arrest him.
PICTURED: Atlanta cop who fatally shot Rayshard Brooks at Wendy's
The Atlanta police officers involved in the fatal shooting of Rayshard Brooks after a confrontation in a Wendy's parking lot have been identified, after the incident rocked the city.www.dailymail.co.uk
Yet again you fail to grasp the situation. A cop should NOT be firing a weapon unless faced with life threatening imminent danger. Even if the situation did warrant use of firearms, surely a shot to the leg to disable a fleeing suspect would be better? Still not right, but not AS bad.List of things I wouldnt do.
Fight with US armed police, steal a disabling weapon point it them..fire..miss then run.
I would be right up with ....
Arrested for intoxicated driving by armed police.
Oh well just shut up and accept punishment, you have no argument, you are not being unfairly treated or interrogated...its not about your race.
They have the full legal and moral authority to arrest you.
The rest was suicide by cop.
And don't let him take the taser off you in the first place. Or don't go from friendly chat to HANDS BEHIND YOUR BACK in a split second with a guy who is obviously tipsy. The whole thing was dealt with so badly.Yet again you fail to grasp the situation. A cop should NOT be firing a weapon unless faced with life threatening imminent danger. Even if the situation did warrant use of firearms, surely a shot to the leg to disable a fleeing suspect would be better? Still not right, but not AS bad.
And remember, it's not about what the person did, or what they're like, or how they're profiled. It's about the fact the police are trying to act as executioners for what would be considered petty crime. If they're trained in firearms (which they should be, if they carry them) they should also be trained in how to aim them, and the difference between vital and disabling target areas. The truth is that American cops are just trigger happy. They're allowed guns, and they just go to them as their first response to anything sudden or unexpected. If you think what the cops did was fine considering the circumstances, you really need to get your head checked out.
Donald Trump says he will not watch NFL and US Soccer if players kneel
United States president Donald Trump says he will not watch the NFL or the US Soccer sides if players do not stand for the national anthem.www.bbc.co.uk
Wow...what a loss
Police in the US are trained to shoot to kill.Watch him ignore you @Syri - and maybe post something from the daily fail to continue on.
I've made that very point to him and he, predictably, didn't address it.
Come on @Job. They sacked the cop and the head of police resigned. You'll probably say it was 'public messaging' and ignore the actual point - but should cops be shooting to kill when they're not in danger?
Yes or no.
Answer the fucking question you faux-scouse cunt.Police in the US are trained to shoot to kill.
So outraging public decency.
Come on. Yes or no.Are police trained to shoot to kill when not in danger?
Ahem...When in danger is an entirely subjective statement.
Are you suggesting they pull out a flow chart, ask the guy to pause while they break down the scenario.
Shoot to kill if you feel either you or the public are in danger.
Obviously the cop thought in that split second there was, your obviously inferring he shot him because he was angry he had stolen his taser.
I guess its up to the investigation to decide, but strangely ground zero for all things anti police reactive..Reddit.. are leaning on the police's side.
Yes well..Im actually giving redditors an ounce of credibility above street mobs.Ahem...
Atlanta police shooting: Rayshard Brooks death declared homicide
Protests continue after the 27-year-old became the latest African American to be killed by police.www.bbc.co.uk
Did you even fucking read it? A medical examiner said it was homicide due to two bullet wounds in his back.Yes well..Im actually giving redditors an ounce of credibility above street mobs.
@Job knows this. He doesn't care - which is why I'm asking about the principle - and he's such an intellectual coward he won't even simply concede the legal position:Did you even fucking read it? A medical examiner said it was homicide due to two bullet wounds in his back.