C
.cage
Guest
- Thread starter
- #31
Originally posted by Durzel
doh_boy and prime1 hit the nail on the head imo.
yeah
Originally posted by Durzel
doh_boy and prime1 hit the nail on the head imo.
Originally posted by prime1
John Leslie was a womaniser, but theres a huge difference between that and a rapist.
Originally posted by bigbb
The press have known who it is for ages. They were waiting and provoking other associates of Leslie to make the first move, otherwise they'd be in libel up to their necks.
Originally posted by Gumb0
You're only guilty of Libel if what you say is untrue.
Originally posted by Testin da Cable
You're only innocent of libel if other people believe the person who says he can prove what you say is true
Originally posted by Testin da Cable
who? what?
Originally posted by Super_Gray[SG]
Where why when?!
Originally posted by Stazbumpa
And does it involve livestock?
I guess you thought right then :|Originally posted by dysfunction
I didnt think this would end up being an amusing thread...
Originally posted by Wij
<STU>
You're only innocent of Libel if you can prove what you say is true.
</STU>
or summat like that![]()
Originally posted by Wij
I kinda think he did it tbh.
Originally posted by Mellow-
I think a lot of you are missing the point that Ulrika is actually a complete slapper.
Originally posted by legendario
so?
It doesn't make it ok for someone to rape her if he actually did.
You wouldn't turn her down, though