N
nath
Guest
Avoid at all costs.
That is all.
That is all.
W
Will
Guest
- Thread starter
- #2
The review in The Scotsman started with "Dying faster than an Ebola-infected monkey on its US release..." and finished with "...saying this film is better than its prequel is correct, but that is like saying a broken arm is better than a broken leg."
I think I'll give it a miss.
I think I'll give it a miss.
N
nath
Guest
- Thread starter
- #3
I don't think it was better than the previous one. At least in that you saw a bit of flesh in the shower scene.
E
Embattle
Guest
- Thread starter
- #4
Well least it followed the games....crap.
J
Jonaldo
Guest
- Thread starter
- #5
Was there any doubt it'd be utter wazz? 
S
Sar
Guest
- Thread starter
- #6
I liked the first one.
<--Big AJ fan though.
<--Big AJ fan though.
E
ECA
Guest
- Thread starter
- #7
Originally posted by Omniscieous
Was there any doubt it'd be utter wazz?
No, and people who say *it might be good* just will never learn about hollywood.
J
Jonaldo
Guest
- Thread starter
- #8
Just buy the poster thenOriginally posted by Sar
<--Big AJ fan though.
cheaper and she's in it all the time
P
pg_exoshear
Guest
- Thread starter
- #9
Saw it in Holland 2 weeks before it came out here.
I thought it was a rather nice film. Nothing to get all crazy over, but it was watchable.
I thought it was a rather nice film. Nothing to get all crazy over, but it was watchable.
X
xane
Guest
- Thread starter
- #10
I liked the first film too.
D
Durzel
Guest
- Thread starter
- #11
Slightly OT but I read in a review about "text messenging and why its the bane of Hollywood" that Charlies Angels: Full Throttle bombed as well?
Anyone have any confirmation of this? I can't find any article about it whatsoever...
Anyone have any confirmation of this? I can't find any article about it whatsoever...
1
1tchy trigger
Guest
- Thread starter
- #12
I heard it bombed in the States because the latest Lara Croft game sucked so bad that people thought the film would be as bad.
W
Will
Guest
- Thread starter
- #13
I read that too...it went along hte lines of "if we spend money marketing a film, it used to sell no matter how bad it was. Nowadays, people text each other after seing it and warn their friends it is shite."
T
Testin da Cable
Guest
- Thread starter
- #14
I saw it and it was reasonably shite. as in go out and have a few pints after. not go out and bang pavingstones against your skull till your eyes explode out through your ears a la dracula2000esque films. the only thing I was quite unhappy about was the bit where she punches the shark.
X
Xtro
Guest
- Thread starter
- #15
The film could be 90 minutes of Angelina crapping into a bucket and I'd still watch it. Hell I'd PREFER that!
J
Jonaldo
Guest
- Thread starter
- #16
Could think of better things she could be doing that I'd rather watch
Has she made a good film yet? I didn't rate the first Tomb Raider film much. Think I only ever saw her in that Hackers film before now and that was so laughably bad it was er... laughably bad!
W
Wij
Guest
- Thread starter
- #17
She played a lezza in some crap film.
J
Jonaldo
Guest
- Thread starter
- #18
B
bids
Guest
- Thread starter
- #19
She was ok in Bone Collector with Denzil.
T
Testin da Cable
Guest
- Thread starter
- #20
I spunked on her lips after TBC. very nice indeed.
G
Garaen
Guest
- Thread starter
- #21
Was good in Gone in 60 second's imo 
W
Will
Guest
- Thread starter
- #22
Girl Interrupted.
Just in case you are tempted, it is indeed teh suck. And not the good kind of suck either.
A
andyr00barb
Guest
- Thread starter
- #23
R
ReActor
Guest
- Thread starter
- #24
Actually I can't think of a good film she's been in. Which is a shame because she's quite attractive and certainly not the worst Hollywood actress out there.
M
~Mobius~
Guest
- Thread starter
- #25
Any boobies?
W
Wij
Guest
- Thread starter
- #26
Yeh.
J
Jonaldo
Guest
- Thread starter
- #27
Her hair is a mess tho