SPAM This thread is for random spam!!

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,493
The vast majority of londoners are far removed from the excesses of the city.
How the hell would you know? You didn't recognise it and you've never been there.

Making statements you just can't back up again.

I've stopped while cycling to admire the Shard from Richmond Park.
That's a bit too vague for @Job to understand.

Here you go Job - a visual representation. Nobody in London is too far away not to be reminded of the centre. Like City 17.
 
Last edited:

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
One minute you are ranting about the income gap and the rise of the hyper rich, then you are denying the obscenity of the skyscraper infestation in the city..the very description of capitalisms worst excess.
Empty multi million pound flats and office space designed to show off excessive wealth.
Most of the people who can see those buildings couldnt afford to buy 5 sqft of them.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Newham in east London is ranked as England’s number one homelessness hotspot, with at least one in every 24 people in housing insecurity. More than 14,500 people were in temporary accommodation in the borough, and 76 were sleeping rough.

In the capital as a whole, 170,000 people – equivalent to one in 52 – have no home. Westminster had the most rough sleepers, 217, followed by Camden, with 127. In Kensington and Chelsea, the UK’s richest borough, there were over 5,000 homeless people – equivalent to one in every 29 residents.



The figures indicate how homelessness and housing insecurity is spreading beyond its traditional heartland of London
 

dysfunction

FH is my second home
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,709
Newham in east London is ranked as England’s number one homelessness hotspot, with at least one in every 24 people in housing insecurity. More than 14,500 people were in temporary accommodation in the borough, and 76 were sleeping rough.

In the capital as a whole, 170,000 people – equivalent to one in 52 – have no home. Westminster had the most rough sleepers, 217, followed by Camden, with 127. In Kensington and Chelsea, the UK’s richest borough, there were over 5,000 homeless people – equivalent to one in every 29 residents.



The figures indicate how homelessness and housing insecurity is spreading beyond its traditional heartland of London

No it doesn't. You just stated a few figures which doesn't tell you anything apart from numbers of homeless etc that you have plucked from somewhere.

No date no increase or decrease no comparison to anywhere else in the UK no data source or anything.

Just more of your bullshit and jumping to conclusions.
Just shows you have no idea about anything.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
No it doesn't. You just stated a few figures which doesn't tell you anything apart from numbers of homeless etc that you have plucked from somewhere.

No date no increase or decrease no comparison to anywhere else in the UK no data source or anything.

Just more of your bullshit and jumping to conclusions.
Just shows you have no idea about anything.
Its Shelters latest figures.

At least 320,000 homeless people in Britain, says Shelter
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Its a bit hilarious that I stated most people in London have no connection to the skyscrapers of the city and you say.
'Yes they do..they can see them in the distance.'

With that in mind I'm going for tea with the Moon tonight.
 

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,381
The super rich concrete dicks of the city are hardly London.
You should know that comrade.

Um, what the juddering fuck are you talking about? Those concrete dicks ARE the City of London - the name's even on the Borough you insufferable cretin.

Fuck sake. It also shows how little you know of London - the wife works in a building next to the Gherkin 2 -3 days a week. Those "penises" you refer to, are office blocks full of ordinary people doing fairly ordinary jobs, and whilst there is money there it's nothing compared to down the road in Canary Wharf, where all the stockbrokers and investment bankers work.

I'll assume you are aware that the City and Canary Wharf are two completely separate parts of London, yeah?
 

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,381

And Shelter would never overestimate something to ensure the money keeps coming in would they? If you bothered to read all of the article, you'd see that most of those 320,000 are already in homeless shelters, so the welfare state has already kicked in an they are being helped. A bigger concern is the number of rough sleepers in the UK, around 5,000 in England alone at last count, and the number is slowly going up. I think pointing the finger at any one government would be a bit silly, as it is a result of many things - house and rent prices, immigration, poor life decisions etc etc.

Rough sleeping - explore the data
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Um, what the juddering fuck are you talking about? Those concrete dicks ARE the City of London - the name's even on the Borough you insufferable cretin.

Fuck sake. It also shows how little you know of London - the wife works in a building next to the Gherkin 2 -3 days a week. Those "penises" you refer to, are office blocks full of ordinary people doing fairly ordinary jobs, and whilst there is money there it's nothing compared to down the road in Canary Wharf, where all the stockbrokers and investment bankers work.

I'll assume you are aware that the City and Canary Wharf are two completely separate parts of London, yeah?
I wrote that they are the skyscrapers of the city and you called me a cretin for not knowing they were the skyscrapers of the city.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Tommy is far too toxic for Farage to be historically associated with through Ukip.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,127
Farage owes Tommy for the win though.

He got plenty of anti-Muslim votes.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Isnt it great when right wing attitudes get things done.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
Anyway Kazakistan.

As you can imagine its not actually like the Borat movie..its a beautiful and thriving place with a secular constitution after getting Kazaxit from the EU..sorry USSR.


View: https://youtu.be/BElOyEjTujk
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
"The most puzzling development in politics during the last decade is the apparent determination of Western European leaders to re-create the Soviet Union in Western Europe."

Mikhail Gorbachev
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,127
Said by a Soviet Union leader.

I don't recall the EU sending tanks into a country to pacify it.

Russia are scared of a united Europe, they -always- have been.
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
He brought down the wall and pretty well started the end of the empire.

He changed to social democracy and that quote is after the fall of the the Russian Empire, it was reply to the endless attack against the USSR.

He is merely pointing out...if it was so bad...why are you building one?

And now we have an army...with tanks I presume.
 

Gwadien

Uneducated Northern Cretin
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
20,127
He brought down the wall and pretty well started the end of the empire.

He changed to social democracy and that quote is after the fall of the the Russian Empire, it was reply to the endless attack against the USSR.

He is merely pointing out...if it was so bad...why are you building one?

And now we have an army...with tanks I presume.

I still don't understand why you believe that the EU poses such a threat, especially since our very own war mongering approach is evident.
 

DaGaffer

Down With That Sorta Thing
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
18,635
He brought down the wall and pretty well started the end of the empire.

He changed to social democracy and that quote is after the fall of the the Russian Empire, it was reply to the endless attack against the USSR.

He is merely pointing out...if it was so bad...why are you building one?

And now we have an army...with tanks I presume.

Did he fuck "bring down the wall". Peristroika got away from him and he could no longer control events. Gorbachev was a passenger in the last days of the Soviet Union.

Then there's the other problem with your quote; there's no evidence he ever said it. Its completely unsourced.
 

CorNokZ

Currently a stay at home dad
Joined
Jan 24, 2004
Messages
19,779
"The most puzzling development in politics during the last decade is the apparent determination of Western European leaders to re-create the Soviet Union in Western Europe."

Mikhail Gorbachev
Please source that. People having been throwing this around for years and no one has been able to source it.

Don’t believe all you read on the interwebz, noobs
- Abraham Lolcoln
 

Job

The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
21,652
I'm a pensioner now.

Taken my pension, I'll be shouting at kids on scooters and voting ukip.

Oh hang on
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom